For those of you who may have missed my twenty or thirty notices, the URL of "Sense And Sensibility", an American Nazi Party affiliated blog was changed to www.anp14california.blogspot.com

on September 1, 2012.

Dan  88!

Occupy Wall Street Is Still Here!

CNN) -- Occupy protesters succeeded in shutting down overnight operations at California's port of Oakland on Monday night after a day of similar protests in several other U.S. cities.

The protests in Oakland have "disrupted workers trying to get to work and impaired the port's ability to operate," port spokesman Issac Kos-Read told CNN. Craig Merrilees, a spokesman for the International Longshore and Warehouse Union, said the port has told its members not to report for work for the overnight shift because of the mass of protesters at the port.

Earlier Monday, the port authority said in a statement there were "some delays of truck traffic" but said the port remained operational.

"Today's disruptions have been costly to port workers and their families in terms of lost wages and shifts," said Port of Oakland Executive Director Omar Benjamin, who suggested the movement should focus on "real solutions to the problems plaguing our economy."

On a normal night, several hundred people would be working the graveyard shift, Kos-Read said. Day shifts involve several thousand, he said. He said the protests have cost workers their wages, cost the city and region some revenue and could cause shipping firms to divert vessels to other ports.

"What has this accomplished?" he asked. "This is disrupting the 99%"

Oakland Mayor Jean Quan concurred, saying the Occupy movement isn't thinking of the consequences of its actions and who it is actually hurting.

"They are saying ... they have to get the attention of the ruling class. I think the ruling class is probably laughing and people in this city will be crying this Christmas," Quan said. "It's really got to stop."

Oakland has been a flashpoint of the Occupy movement since October, when police used tear gas to break up demonstrators who refused to leave downtown. One demonstrator, a Marine veteran of the war in Iraq, suffered a skull fracture after being hit with a police projectile, according to a veteran's group; police said they acted after the crowd threw paint and other objects at officers.

The ILWU -- which represents 15,000 dockworkers -- has distanced itself from the protest movement. The union "shares the Occupy movement's concerns about the future of the middle class and corporate abuses," ILWU President Robert McEllrath wrote to locals last week -- but he urged the movement to stay out of its dispute with the port of Longview, Washington, and warned against "outside groups attempting to co-opt our struggle in order to advance a broader agenda."

Monday's demonstrations also took place in Los Angeles, Seattle, Houston and Portland, Oregon. Organizers said the goal was to shut down ports in an effort to "disrupt the economic machine that benefits the wealthiest individuals and corporations."

In Houston, police arrested 20 protesters after dozens of police on foot and on horseback confronted a somewhat larger group of Occupy protesters who blocked an interstate on-ramp, authorities said.

Groups of up to six protesters got down on the pavement and interlocked arms and legs, while a larger group stood near them yelling protest slogans. Officers set up barricades to cordon off protesters in an attempt to free the ramp for traffic. The majority of the protesters could be seen moving behind the barricades, with a few exceptions, including those who had lain down.

Police handcuffed some protesters and led them to a police vehicle. Six face felony charges of using criminal instruments to block a public roadway, said Houston Police Department spokesman Victor Senties.

In Long Beach, California, protests caused isolated traffic delays but did not hinder port operations, according to Police Chief Jim McDonnell.

"Two arrests were made -- one for resisting and one for failure to disperse, as well as a number of traffic citations issued to pedestrians," he said.

About 80 protesters demonstrated outside the gate of San Diego's port, but caused no disruption, port spokesman Ron Powell said.

"They were there at a time when we really didn't have a lot of truck traffic coming in and out," he said.

Four people who sat down in the road were arrested, he said. San Diego police did not immediately return a telephone call seeking information on the arrests.

A spokesman for the port in Portland said the protests had partially shut down the port there. In addition to the West Coast port blockades, demonstrators in Salt Lake City and Denver said they were planning to disrupt operations of Walmart distribution facilities. About 40 to 50 people protested at the Denver facility, CNN affiliate KCNC reported.

The demonstrations were part of a nationwide day of protest called in the aftermath of efforts by cities across the country -- including New York, Boston and Oakland -- to clear demonstrators from encampments they had set up in public parks and other locations.

"We are occupying the ports as part of a day of action, boycott and march for full legalization and good jobs for all to draw attention to and protest the criminal system of concentrated wealth that depends on local and global exploitation of working people, and the denial of workers' rights to organize for decent pay, working conditions and benefits, in disregard for the environment and the health and safety of surrounding communities," organizers said on their website.

The port protesters are focusing on terminals owned by SSA Marine, saying it is owed by the Goldman Sachs investment firm, which they argue exemplifies corporate greed and is anti-union.

SSA Senior Vice President Bob Watters disputed the protesters' claims, saying Goldman Sachs owns less than 3% of an investment fund that has a minority stake in the company. He also said the company is the largest employer of International Longshore and Warehouse Union members on the West Coast.

In a letter to members sent last month, International Longshore and Warehouse Union president Robert McEllrath said the organization shares Occupy protesters concerns about what they consider corporate abuses, but he said the union was not sanctioning any shutdown.

Protest organizers said on their website that they were acting independently of organized labor only because the unions are "constrained under reactionary, anti-union federal legislation."

Some port workers are also against the planned blockade.

"I'm just barely getting on my feet again after two years, and now I gotta go a day without pay while somebody else has something to say that I'm not really sure is relevant to the cause," trucker Chuck Baca told CNN affiliate KGO.

Port officials say shutting down their facilities will only cost workers and their communities wages and tax revenue.

"Protesters wanted to send a message to the 1% but they are impacting the 99%," said Portland port spokesman Josh Thomas. The stoppage is resulting in "lost shifts, lost wages and delays," he said.

Port of San Diego board chairman Scott Peters issued an open letter to the community on Sunday asking that protesters not disrupt work.

"The Port of San Diego is made up of working people with families who serve the public each day by helping to bring in goods that are important to the people of the San Diego region," Peters wrote.

"They are the 99%, the gardeners, the maintenance workers, the dock workers, the Harbor Police officers, the office workers, the environmental workers -- all working to improve the quality of life in San Diego Bay and on its surrounding lands," he said. "It is these people who would be hurt by a blockade of our Port."

CNN's Greg Morrison, Amanda Watts, Shawn Nottingham and Sara Weisfeldt contributed to this report.

Comment:

Mr. Thomas has a point when he said the protester's actions had a negative effect on the dockworkers who are part of the 99%. On the other hand, I say the dockworkers should have JOINED the protesters, rather than just try and do their jobs.

I'm well aware that they would have been putting their jobs in jeopardy if they did, but if we want real change, then people have to be willing to sacrifice. You can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs.

The people of America have, for the most part become soft, spineless weaklings, cowering for their jobs in the shadow of their Lord High Master (their boss). "I can't come to Laurens. I'd have to miss a day of work and my boss might fire me." "I can't protest. If my boss finds out he might fire me." "I have to go to work sick as a dog because my boss might be pissed off if I call in sick because we're short handed." Maybe if they hired more help they wouldn't be short handed in the first place. But noooo, that would cut into the company's profits too much.

The people of America have had their spirits broken from years of abuse and exploitation. Fortunately, that kind of thing takes time, and our young people haven't been broken yet. They are the backbone of "Occupy Wall Street". There are some older people, but mostly it seems to be younger workers.

On the brighter side, most people are followers, not leaders. The more that stand up to the system, the more that will join in, and it will continue to spread like a virus. But this time, it's the elite that will feel the effects, not the working and middle class.

Keep up the good work OWS. We mustn't stop until we achieve victory!

Dan 88!

Occupy Wall Street Is Still Here!

CNN) -- Occupy protesters succeeded in shutting down overnight operations at California's port of Oakland on Monday night after a day of similar protests in several other U.S. cities.

The protests in Oakland have "disrupted workers trying to get to work and impaired the port's ability to operate," port spokesman Issac Kos-Read told CNN. Craig Merrilees, a spokesman for the International Longshore and Warehouse Union, said the port has told its members not to report for work for the overnight shift because of the mass of protesters at the port.

Earlier Monday, the port authority said in a statement there were "some delays of truck traffic" but said the port remained operational.

"Today's disruptions have been costly to port workers and their families in terms of lost wages and shifts," said Port of Oakland Executive Director Omar Benjamin, who suggested the movement should focus on "real solutions to the problems plaguing our economy."

On a normal night, several hundred people would be working the graveyard shift, Kos-Read said. Day shifts involve several thousand, he said. He said the protests have cost workers their wages, cost the city and region some revenue and could cause shipping firms to divert vessels to other ports.

"What has this accomplished?" he asked. "This is disrupting the 99%"

Oakland Mayor Jean Quan concurred, saying the Occupy movement isn't thinking of the consequences of its actions and who it is actually hurting.

"They are saying ... they have to get the attention of the ruling class. I think the ruling class is probably laughing and people in this city will be crying this Christmas," Quan said. "It's really got to stop."

Oakland has been a flashpoint of the Occupy movement since October, when police used tear gas to break up demonstrators who refused to leave downtown. One demonstrator, a Marine veteran of the war in Iraq, suffered a skull fracture after being hit with a police projectile, according to a veteran's group; police said they acted after the crowd threw paint and other objects at officers.

The ILWU -- which represents 15,000 dockworkers -- has distanced itself from the protest movement. The union "shares the Occupy movement's concerns about the future of the middle class and corporate abuses," ILWU President Robert McEllrath wrote to locals last week -- but he urged the movement to stay out of its dispute with the port of Longview, Washington, and warned against "outside groups attempting to co-opt our struggle in order to advance a broader agenda."

Monday's demonstrations also took place in Los Angeles, Seattle, Houston and Portland, Oregon. Organizers said the goal was to shut down ports in an effort to "disrupt the economic machine that benefits the wealthiest individuals and corporations."

In Houston, police arrested 20 protesters after dozens of police on foot and on horseback confronted a somewhat larger group of Occupy protesters who blocked an interstate on-ramp, authorities said.

Groups of up to six protesters got down on the pavement and interlocked arms and legs, while a larger group stood near them yelling protest slogans. Officers set up barricades to cordon off protesters in an attempt to free the ramp for traffic. The majority of the protesters could be seen moving behind the barricades, with a few exceptions, including those who had lain down.

Police handcuffed some protesters and led them to a police vehicle. Six face felony charges of using criminal instruments to block a public roadway, said Houston Police Department spokesman Victor Senties.

In Long Beach, California, protests caused isolated traffic delays but did not hinder port operations, according to Police Chief Jim McDonnell.

"Two arrests were made -- one for resisting and one for failure to disperse, as well as a number of traffic citations issued to pedestrians," he said.

About 80 protesters demonstrated outside the gate of San Diego's port, but caused no disruption, port spokesman Ron Powell said.

"They were there at a time when we really didn't have a lot of truck traffic coming in and out," he said.

Four people who sat down in the road were arrested, he said. San Diego police did not immediately return a telephone call seeking information on the arrests.

A spokesman for the port in Portland said the protests had partially shut down the port there. In addition to the West Coast port blockades, demonstrators in Salt Lake City and Denver said they were planning to disrupt operations of Walmart distribution facilities. About 40 to 50 people protested at the Denver facility, CNN affiliate KCNC reported.

The demonstrations were part of a nationwide day of protest called in the aftermath of efforts by cities across the country -- including New York, Boston and Oakland -- to clear demonstrators from encampments they had set up in public parks and other locations.

"We are occupying the ports as part of a day of action, boycott and march for full legalization and good jobs for all to draw attention to and protest the criminal system of concentrated wealth that depends on local and global exploitation of working people, and the denial of workers' rights to organize for decent pay, working conditions and benefits, in disregard for the environment and the health and safety of surrounding communities," organizers said on their website.

The port protesters are focusing on terminals owned by SSA Marine, saying it is owed by the Goldman Sachs investment firm, which they argue exemplifies corporate greed and is anti-union.

SSA Senior Vice President Bob Watters disputed the protesters' claims, saying Goldman Sachs owns less than 3% of an investment fund that has a minority stake in the company. He also said the company is the largest employer of International Longshore and Warehouse Union members on the West Coast.

In a letter to members sent last month, International Longshore and Warehouse Union president Robert McEllrath said the organization shares Occupy protesters concerns about what they consider corporate abuses, but he said the union was not sanctioning any shutdown.

Protest organizers said on their website that they were acting independently of organized labor only because the unions are "constrained under reactionary, anti-union federal legislation."

Some port workers are also against the planned blockade.

"I'm just barely getting on my feet again after two years, and now I gotta go a day without pay while somebody else has something to say that I'm not really sure is relevant to the cause," trucker Chuck Baca told CNN affiliate KGO.

Port officials say shutting down their facilities will only cost workers and their communities wages and tax revenue.

"Protesters wanted to send a message to the 1% but they are impacting the 99%," said Portland port spokesman Josh Thomas. The stoppage is resulting in "lost shifts, lost wages and delays," he said.

Port of San Diego board chairman Scott Peters issued an open letter to the community on Sunday asking that protesters not disrupt work.

"The Port of San Diego is made up of working people with families who serve the public each day by helping to bring in goods that are important to the people of the San Diego region," Peters wrote.

"They are the 99%, the gardeners, the maintenance workers, the dock workers, the Harbor Police officers, the office workers, the environmental workers -- all working to improve the quality of life in San Diego Bay and on its surrounding lands," he said. "It is these people who would be hurt by a blockade of our Port."

CNN's Greg Morrison, Amanda Watts, Shawn Nottingham and Sara Weisfeldt contributed to this report.

Comment:

Mr. Thomas has a point when he said the protester's actions had a negative effect on the dockworkers who are part of the 99%. On the other hand, I say the dockworkers should have JOINED the protesters, rather than just try and do their jobs.

I'm well aware that they would have been putting their jobs in jeopardy if they did, but if we want real change, then people have to be willing to sacrifice. You can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs.

The people of America have, for the most part become soft, spineless weaklings, cowering for their jobs in the shadow of their Lord High Master (their boss). "I can't come to Laurens. I'd have to miss a day of work and my boss might fire me." "I can't protest. If my boss finds out he might fire me." "I have to go to work sick as a dog because my boss might be pissed off if I call in sick because we're short handed." Maybe if they hired more help they wouldn't be short handed in the first place. But noooo, that would cut into the company's profits too much.

The people of America have had their spirits broken from years of abuse and exploitation. Fortunately, that kind of thing takes time, and our young people haven't been broken yet. They are the backbone of "Occupy Wall Street". There are some older people, but mostly it seems to be younger workers.

On the brighter side, most people are followers, not leaders. The more that stand up to the system, the more that will join in, and it will continue to spread like a virus. But this time, it's the elite that will feel the effects, not the working and middle class.

Keep up the good work OWS. We mustn't stop until we achieve victory!

Dan 88!

Reconquistos To Stage Their Own "Protest"

By Miguel Perez

Members of Nuestros Reconquistos, Take Back Aztlán, and the Aztlánian Brotherhood met at the Phoenix Public Library this morning to discuss a future movement for Latinos called “Occupy Aztlán.” It will start in Phoenix and eventually involve protesting in states originally owned by Mexico.

“Occupy Wall Street” has been such as success,” says Nuestros Reconquistos President Manuel Longoria. Latinos will create a symbolic similar movement that will remind Americans who originally owned Mexican lands occupied by California, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, Texas and Oklahoma.”

Latinos plan non-violent protests in mostly upscale areas where rich White people live. Part of the demonstrations include door-to-door protests. “Occupy Aztlán” will start in January.

Comment:

Protest door-to-door? WTF does that mean? Are they planning on knocking on White people's doors and tell them to get out off the land they legally bought and paid for? Back in New Hampshire we had a word for that: TRESPASSING! Here in California I'm not so sure these days, but definitely in New England and the South.

The only way this insanity will end is if we end it. For one thing, I don't feel we stole anything from them. They lost it in the Mexican-American war, which they started in the first place. California wasn't even taken. It was sold to us by Mexico shortly after the war because they were broke, and the United States thought it best to keep them below the Rio Grande all the way. At least in the case of California, they are complaining to the wrong people. They should address their gripes to Mexico City.

I know this is true because a few years ago, former Mexican President Vicente Fox commented in an interview that technically Santa Catalina Island and the other channel islands still belong to Mexico. He said the deed of sale of California to the United States did not include the offshore islands, just the mainland. He also added that Mexico has no plans of pressing this claim. Gee, I'm so relieved to know that. lol

Comrades, just as they are stepping up their activism, so must we. As the Latino holiday Los Posados (don't ask me, but it is related to Christmas) begins on December 17, and Christmas is less than two weeks away, I doubt they'll be doing too much until after the holidays. Activism will take up too much valuable drinking time. I only said that because I've noticed a sharp in crease in beer and tequila sales in the markets recently. Mostly Corona, of course. So we can afford a little time off for the holidays as well, but after New Year's Day, we have to jump back into things with both feet, and renewed resolve.

So relax and enjoy the upcoming holidays, and be prepared to renew the fight with the New Year.

Dan 88!

Reconquistos To Stage Their Own "Protest"

By Miguel Perez

Members of Nuestros Reconquistos, Take Back Aztlán, and the Aztlánian Brotherhood met at the Phoenix Public Library this morning to discuss a future movement for Latinos called “Occupy Aztlán.” It will start in Phoenix and eventually involve protesting in states originally owned by Mexico.

“Occupy Wall Street” has been such as success,” says Nuestros Reconquistos President Manuel Longoria. Latinos will create a symbolic similar movement that will remind Americans who originally owned Mexican lands occupied by California, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, Texas and Oklahoma.”

Latinos plan non-violent protests in mostly upscale areas where rich White people live. Part of the demonstrations include door-to-door protests. “Occupy Aztlán” will start in January.

Comment:

Protest door-to-door? WTF does that mean? Are they planning on knocking on White people's doors and tell them to get out off the land they legally bought and paid for? Back in New Hampshire we had a word for that: TRESPASSING! Here in California I'm not so sure these days, but definitely in New England and the South.

The only way this insanity will end is if we end it. For one thing, I don't feel we stole anything from them. They lost it in the Mexican-American war, which they started in the first place. California wasn't even taken. It was sold to us by Mexico shortly after the war because they were broke, and the United States thought it best to keep them below the Rio Grande all the way. At least in the case of California, they are complaining to the wrong people. They should address their gripes to Mexico City.

I know this is true because a few years ago, former Mexican President Vicente Fox commented in an interview that technically Santa Catalina Island and the other channel islands still belong to Mexico. He said the deed of sale of California to the United States did not include the offshore islands, just the mainland. He also added that Mexico has no plans of pressing this claim. Gee, I'm so relieved to know that. lol

Comrades, just as they are stepping up their activism, so must we. As the Latino holiday Los Posados (don't ask me, but it is related to Christmas) begins on December 17, and Christmas is less than two weeks away, I doubt they'll be doing too much until after the holidays. Activism will take up too much valuable drinking time. I only said that because I've noticed a sharp in crease in beer and tequila sales in the markets recently. Mostly Corona, of course. So we can afford a little time off for the holidays as well, but after New Year's Day, we have to jump back into things with both feet, and renewed resolve.

So relax and enjoy the upcoming holidays, and be prepared to renew the fight with the New Year.

Dan 88!

Banksters Are Plotting To Take Your Home

For those not paying close attention to this issue already, it may be news to you that despite being outed a year ago for using the practice of robosigning to fabricate thousands of documents used to foreclose on homeowners, banks are still using this practice today.

American Banker:

Some of the largest mortgage servicers are still fabricating documents that should have been signed years ago and submitting them as evidence to foreclose on homeowners.

The practice continues nearly a year after the companies were caught cutting corners in the robo-signing scandal and about six months after the industry began negotiating a settlement with state attorneys general investigating loan-servicing abuses.

Several dozen documents reviewed by American Banker show that as recently as August some of the largest U.S. banks, including Bank of America Corp., Wells Fargo & Co., Ally Financial Inc., and OneWest Financial Inc., were essentially backdating paperwork necessary to support their right to foreclose.

Some of documents reviewed by American Banker included signatures by current bank employees claiming to represent lenders that no longer exist.

David Dayen explains what this means:

And you see, the banks HAVE to fabricate documents. Because they destroyed the private property system through improper and sloppy securitizations and lost or missing mortgage assignments during the bubble years, and as such they cannot prove standing to foreclose without lying. Robo-signing is a crime, but it’s also a cover-up for a much bigger crime, which involves MERS and improper mortgage transfer and securities fraud. The robo-signed, forged, fabricated documents are the smokescreen being used to foreclose and get the real problem off the books. Banks are trying to wriggle off the hook by saying they are merely “memorializing” past actions with the fake documents. Some courts aren’t buying it; the pooling and servicing agreements stipulate that all assignments showing transfers must take place within 60 days, not years later through “memorialized” actions.

What this really comes down to is that making a settlement with banks around robosigning now, while there has been no real investigation by the state law enforcement officials who are negotiating a settlement and while the practice is continuing as the negotiations go on, is dangerous and premature. The banks can't possibly be negotiating in good faith with Tom Miller and the other state AGs because they're still committing the crimes they want to be released from prosecution for!

There's a massive criminal scheme being revealed by the press and a handful of diligent public officials like Attorneys General Eric Schneiderman, Catherine Cortez Masto and Beau Biden, as well as county Registers of Deeds like Jeff Thigpen in North Carolina and John O'Brien in Massachusetts. These officials seem committed to pursuing investigation and accountability. It's time their peers get on board.

Commentary:

Comrades, this whole situation is completely unacceptable. Even at this moment, the Banksters are trying to cover up their crimes, and at the same time attempting to wriggle their way off the hook. I'm sorry to say they will probably succeed.

Firstly, Wall Street has been in bed with Washington D.C. since at least 1913 (the founding of the Federal Reserve Bank), and any financial penalties will range in the hundreds of billions of dollars range, which ZOG feels will boost its sagging economy.

Think of it this way: If some billionaire killed a loved one of yours while drunk driving, and you were the only witness, and he offered you one hundred million dollars not to testify, how many average people would have the strength of character to turn down that much money and do what's right?

That alone is one of the best reasons why the Judeo-Capitalist system has to go. It is the closest thing to being the Devil there is. If they can't get what they want through power and influence, they buy it.

I'm sad to say that everyone has their price, which is why the temptation MUST be removed. Judeo-Capitalism must be destroyed once and for all.

National Socialism is the last best hope for White America. Support the ANP. If you already do, then do more than just pay your pledge. Get out there and spread our message. If you don't, who will?

Dan 88!

Banksters Are Plotting To Take Your Home

For those not paying close attention to this issue already, it may be news to you that despite being outed a year ago for using the practice of robosigning to fabricate thousands of documents used to foreclose on homeowners, banks are still using this practice today.

American Banker:

Some of the largest mortgage servicers are still fabricating documents that should have been signed years ago and submitting them as evidence to foreclose on homeowners.

The practice continues nearly a year after the companies were caught cutting corners in the robo-signing scandal and about six months after the industry began negotiating a settlement with state attorneys general investigating loan-servicing abuses.

Several dozen documents reviewed by American Banker show that as recently as August some of the largest U.S. banks, including Bank of America Corp., Wells Fargo & Co., Ally Financial Inc., and OneWest Financial Inc., were essentially backdating paperwork necessary to support their right to foreclose.

Some of documents reviewed by American Banker included signatures by current bank employees claiming to represent lenders that no longer exist.

David Dayen explains what this means:

And you see, the banks HAVE to fabricate documents. Because they destroyed the private property system through improper and sloppy securitizations and lost or missing mortgage assignments during the bubble years, and as such they cannot prove standing to foreclose without lying. Robo-signing is a crime, but it’s also a cover-up for a much bigger crime, which involves MERS and improper mortgage transfer and securities fraud. The robo-signed, forged, fabricated documents are the smokescreen being used to foreclose and get the real problem off the books. Banks are trying to wriggle off the hook by saying they are merely “memorializing” past actions with the fake documents. Some courts aren’t buying it; the pooling and servicing agreements stipulate that all assignments showing transfers must take place within 60 days, not years later through “memorialized” actions.

What this really comes down to is that making a settlement with banks around robosigning now, while there has been no real investigation by the state law enforcement officials who are negotiating a settlement and while the practice is continuing as the negotiations go on, is dangerous and premature. The banks can't possibly be negotiating in good faith with Tom Miller and the other state AGs because they're still committing the crimes they want to be released from prosecution for!

There's a massive criminal scheme being revealed by the press and a handful of diligent public officials like Attorneys General Eric Schneiderman, Catherine Cortez Masto and Beau Biden, as well as county Registers of Deeds like Jeff Thigpen in North Carolina and John O'Brien in Massachusetts. These officials seem committed to pursuing investigation and accountability. It's time their peers get on board.

Commentary:

Comrades, this whole situation is completely unacceptable. Even at this moment, the Banksters are trying to cover up their crimes, and at the same time attempting to wriggle their way off the hook. I'm sorry to say they will probably succeed.

Firstly, Wall Street has been in bed with Washington D.C. since at least 1913 (the founding of the Federal Reserve Bank), and any financial penalties will range in the hundreds of billions of dollars range, which ZOG feels will boost its sagging economy.

Think of it this way: If some billionaire killed a loved one of yours while drunk driving, and you were the only witness, and he offered you one hundred million dollars not to testify, how many average people would have the strength of character to turn down that much money and do what's right?

That alone is one of the best reasons why the Judeo-Capitalist system has to go. It is the closest thing to being the Devil there is. If they can't get what they want through power and influence, they buy it.

I'm sad to say that everyone has their price, which is why the temptation MUST be removed. Judeo-Capitalism must be destroyed once and for all.

National Socialism is the last best hope for White America. Support the ANP. If you already do, then do more than just pay your pledge. Get out there and spread our message. If you don't, who will?

Dan 88!