At one time, not all that long ago, homosexuality was not tolerated
in our society. They were considered mentally ill, and the act of Sodomy was illegal in all 50 states. At that time, homosexuals usually 'stayed in the closet'. In other words, they concealed their perversions out of fear of arrest or institutionalisation. However, little by little, creeping through the body of our society like a cancer, this began to change. First, the act of Sodomy began to be decriminilised state, by state. Then, homosexuality itself was removed from the APA DSM's list of mental illnesses. Then, Gays gained more and more rights and protections under the law. They even have gotten intimidation and violent crimes against them to be classified as 'hate crimes'.
Since homosexuals have now achieved a 'protected status' from both state and the federal governments, more Gays than ever before, are now 'out of the closet'. Many parents fear their children could be molested, encouraged to become sexually active, or even recruited into this disgusting lifestyle by homosexual predators, also known as 'Chicken Hawks'. Indeed, crimes against children are on the rise, hence the passing of new laws, such as 'Megan's Law.'
MALES COMMIT MORE SEX CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN THAN FEMALES
The Gay Community dismisses these fears as being completely homophobic in nature. They insist there is absolutely no connection between homosexuality and child-molestation. If this is so, why do a disproportionately large number of Gay men seek teenage boys as sexual partners? Add to this the fact that less than one percent of convicted child molesters are women. The majority are men, although some of their victims are little girls, the majority are boys. Since Gay men are attracted to other males, it is logical to conclude that there are more Gay men convicted of child molestation than Straight men. Arrest records bear this out.
An essay on sex crimes against children entitled, "Sexual Offending Against Children" reported, It is widely believed that the vast majority of sexual abuse is perpetrated by males and that the female sex offenders only account for a tiny proportion of offenses. With 3000 adult male sex offenders in prison in England and Wales at any one time, the corresponding figure for female sex offenders is 12!"
A report by the American Professional Society On The Abuse Of Children states, "In both clinical and non-clinical samples, the vast majority of offenders are male."
A study in the Journal Of Sex Research states, "Pedophilia is extremely rare in women."
The Gay Community denies a connection, but the arrest records bear it out, and psychologists, who are usually allies of homosexuals also confirm this. They also confirm that the majority of the victims are
male.
A study of 457 male sex offenders against children in the Journal Of Sex And Marital Therapy found that "Approximately one third of these sexual offenders directed their sexual activity against males."
The Journal Of Child Psychiatry stated, "It was commonly believed fifteen years ago that girls were abused in excess of boys in a ratio of about nine to one, but but contemporary studies now indicate that the ratio of girls to boys abused has narrowed remarkably. The majority of community studies suggest a ratio of two to four." Boys are abused twice as much as girls.
WHY ARE WE JUST LEARNING THIS NOW?
Scientist now believe that it has always been this way. The problem for them was in times past, fewer cases of homosexual abuse was reported. Homosexuality had always been considered indecent by society. Gays were labelled as 'fruits', 'faggots', and 'sissies'. Even today amongst children, about the worst name one boy can call another is 'fag'. How many times have we, as adults heard our children say to other children in a derogatory tone something like, "Man, that is so Gay!"
Because of this, when a boy was abused, he was often too ashamed and humiliated to tell anyone. Fear of being labelled a 'fag' kept him silent. However, as homosexuality has moved into the mainstream of society, more and more boys are finding the courage to come forward.
The Department Of Justice's report on child sexual exploitation states, "Adolescent boy victims are highly likely to deny certain types of sexual activity. They are embarrassed and ashamed of their behaviour and rightfully believe that society will not understand their victimization."
The Journal Of Child Psychology adds, "Boys are usually encultured into an ethos where self-reliance, independence and sexual prowess are valued, while showing hurt or homosexuality are denigrated. This may lead to powerful repression or deletion of the experience, with failure to report."
This is very understandable. The last thing any teenage boy wants to be thought of is queer. Even homosexual teenagers fear this due to harassment, intimidation, and violence. Most Gays don't admit their perversions until adulthood.
FACT: HOMOSEXUALS REPRESENT THE VAST MAJORITY OF CONVICTED PEDOPHILES
The Psychiatric Journal Of The University Of Ottowa [Canada] noted that nearly half of convicted pedophiles preferred boys.
The Archives Of Sexual Behaviour also states homosexual pedophiles are vastly overrepresented in child sex offenses cases.
Homosexuals only make up about three percent of the population (contrary to the more popular, but inaccurate ten percent). However, a study conducted by the journal of Child Abuse And Neglect found that fourteen percent targeted only males, and a further twenty eight percent target both sexes, bringing the total of Gay and Bisexual offenders to forty two percent.
Gays and Bisexuals account for only a small percentage of the population, but account for nearly half of the cases. It should also be noted that, although this is no excuse, at least half of the heterosexuals convicted of molesting little girls did it, not for sexual gratification, but in the production of child pornography, which is technically a separate crime. Indeed many Straights convicted of such offenses stated they preferred women, but did what they did to make money. Unfortunately, there is a lot of money to be made in that filthy business. On the other hand, while some homosexuals molested little boys for the purposes of pornography, the majority did it simply for sexual gratification.
GAY ACTIVISTS DEMAND THE LEGALISATION OF PEDOPHILIA
David Thorstad, former president of the New York Gay Activist's Alliance, officially opposes age of consent laws which prohibit adults from having sex with children. This vile, disgusting piece of filth is an admitted pedophile, and founding member of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA). It's incredible that vermin like this are allowed to run around free, but considering the times we live in, it shouldn't be much of a surprise.
Thorstad argues that there is a natural attraction between homosexual men and young boys. He has expressed bitterness that the homosexual rights movement has abandoned pedophiles. But there has always been reluctance on the part of the mainstream Gay Rights movement to accept pedophiles, especially Lesbian groups.
The Lesbian Feminist Liberation movement has officially accused NAMBLA of, "attempting to legitimize sex between children and adults. Feminists easily recognise this as the latest attempt to make palatable the sexual exploitation of children." They also officially condemn heterosexual pedophilia. It seems that even Lesbians have a little motherly instinct in them.
MOST HOMOSEXUALS AT LEAST TOLERATE PEDOPHILES
Despite some opposition, Thorstad claimed that by 1985, pedophiles had won acceptance within the Gay community. Jim Kepner, the then curator of the International Gay and Lesbian Archives in Los Angeles remarked, "A point I've been trying to make is
that if we reject the boylovers in our midst today we'd better stop waving the banner of the Ancient Greeks [Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and Alexander The Great were all admitted homosexuals – author's note], Michelangelo, Leonardo Da Vinci, Oscar Wilde, Walt Whitman, Horatio Alger, and Shakespeare. We'd better stop claiming them as part of our heritage unless we are broadening our concept of what it means to be Gay today."
I would like to point out to the reader, that contrary to what Mr. Kepner said, it has NEVER been proven that Shakespeare or Da Vinci were Gay. Simply because they never married, and had no known "lady friends" is supposition, not proof. There are some individuals who seem to care very little about having sex. The other names mentioned were all known or admitted homosexuals.
Eventually, NAMBLA was officially recognised by Gay Right's groups. However in 1990, this cost the Gay And Lesbian Association its status. The United Nations refused to recognise them as a Non-Governmental Political Organisation because they were protecting admitted criminals (pedophiles) and admitting them as members.
The Gay and Lesbian Association eventually divorced themselves from NAMBLA, and regained partial acceptance from the U.N. However, many countries, Islamic States in particular are still wary of them and have outlawed them in their countries. The GLA still refuses to allow foreign governments access to their membership lists, so it is suspected that they have not severed all ties to pedophile groups, and indeed still have members who are known to them to be pedophiles.
FACT: MOST CHILDREN WHO ARE VICTIMS OF BOTH SEXUAL AND NON-SEXUAL ABUSE GROW UP TO BE ABUSERS THEMSELVES
There is a great deal of evidence that most homosexuals were themselves abused as children. This abuse may have the result of leading them toward homosexuality and/or pedophilia. This is what is often referred to as a vicious cycle.
The Journal Of The American Medical Association did a study of 279 homosexual and bisexual men and reported, "More than half of the subjects reported a sexual act with a male by the age of 16 years, approximately 20 percent by the age of ten years."
A study conducted by the International Journal Of Offender Therapy And Comparative Criminology reported, "In the case of childhood sexual experiences prior to the age of fourteen, 40 percent reported that they had engaged very often in sexual activity with an adult, with 28 percent stating that this type of activity had occurred 'sometimes.' "
The National Institute Of Justice reported, "The odds that a childhood sexual abuse victim will be arrested as an adult for any sex crime is 4.7 times higher than people who experienced no victimization as children."
HOMOSEXUAL AND HETEROSEXUAL PEDOPHILE EMPLOYMENT CHOICES
Pedophiles often seek employment as teachers, counsellors, or clergymen. These are what are known as "positions of special trust."
This way, they put themselves into close contact with children, and are often alone with them for extended periods of time.
THE CLERGY
Most of us are aware of the child molestation scandals that have rocked the Catholic Church in recent years. Victims are coming forward, sometimes as much as 20 years later. However, it should be pointed out, they many of these 'victims' came forward AFTER the first few victims sued the Church and won large sums of money. Many of the later so-called victims have been proven liars with the goal of extorting large judgements from the Church, ruining the reputations of innocent clergymen in the process. But most are sincere and are telling the truth. Many Gay pedophiles entered the priesthood so they would be in a position to victimize young boys (usually alter boys or members of the choir) with impunity. Fortunately, more and more of these vermin are being exposed. We must however be careful and determine which 'victims' are seeking justice, and which are liars seeking money.
It is sad to learn that priests who are accused, and even convicted of child molestation are NOT removed from the priesthood. Many are transferred out of the country, and are still allowed to work closely with children. The Church, unfortunately usually tries to do whatever it can to keep things as quiet as possible, so as not to tarnish the Church's image, not to mention saving them the cost of a lawsuit.
EDUCATORS
School is an excellent venue for a Chicken Hawk to hunt for prey. Teachers are alone with their students for hours. When a teacher asks a student to see him after class, he may have more than the discussion of schoolwork in mind.
I am a former high school English teacher. I never allowed myself to be alone with any student. Not that I was trying to avoid temptation, but I was concerned over a possible misunderstanding, so I always spoke to a student 'alone' in front of a wide-open door with plenty of passers-by who could see us. Since the school board always errs on the side of caution in these matters, so better safe than sorry!
However, I was very distressed to learn that only 40 percent of teachers and other school personnel accused of sexual misconduct were terminated (most were non-tenured teachers or substitutes). Sixty percent were transferred to desk jobs where they would not be coming into contact with children.
COUNSELLORS
What better place to molest a child than when they're at summer camp. Becoming a Boy Scout Camp Counsellor or Troop Leader is a homosexual pedophiles dream come true. In the beginning, known or admitted homosexuals were disqualified from becoming Scout leaders. The first time Gay Rights Activists took this to the United States Supreme Court, they lost. The High Court said that since the Scouts were a private organisation, they were within their rights. When this issue was brought again to the Court in the 1990's, the decision was reversed. The Court said that to bar homosexuals from any non-religious organisation for no other reason than the fact that the person in question is Gay is clearly a violation of his Constitutional rights under the amended 1964 Civil Rights Act which guarantees that no person shall be discriminated against, "because of race, colour, creed, or sexual orientation."
MEDICAL PROFESSION
If you're a pedophile, and a doctor, nurse or medical assistant, and you're alone in an examining room with a child, and you can say, "Take off your clothes." You're in pervert paradise.
Fortunately, the American Medical Association takes sexual improprieties with children or adults extremely seriously. If you get caught with 'your hand in the cookie jar', so to speak, not only could you face criminal charges, plus you could lose your licence. Especially for doctors, this is no small matter. Most homo doctors behave themselves, but every now and again you hear about a case. The Law and the AMA usually move quickly on these scum.
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES
It has only been about twenty years since the courts started to fully appreciate the seriousness of this problem. Until about 1990, in most states in this country, child molestation was a misdemeanor. There was one case in San Diego, California in 1975 of a pedophile who was convicted five times for molesting boys. His first sentence was probation for a year. Second was 30 days. Third was 90 days. Fourth was six months. His fifth was one year in county jail, of which he served seven months. Can you believe that comrades? Seven months for utterly destroying a child's life forever. In my opinion, hanging would have been too good for that piece of filth!
Now the courts are beginning to realise what these animals are. Now they are meting out much more serious punishment. If they want some kind of psychiatric help, they get it, but they still have to sit out their sentences. Thanks to Megan's Law, when they do get out, they have to register themselves as a sex offender for life.
Before Megan's Law, they only had to register as long as they were on parole or probation. Before the computer age, they could easily drop out of sight, use a false name and start again somewhere else. Thankfully, it's more difficult these days to adopt a false identity, which is one reason we must protect ourselves from identity theft. Credit card fraud accounts for only 40 percent of identity thefts. Many of these cases are child molesters trying to drop out of sight so they can more easily victimize children again. How would you feel if you found out someone stole your identity and molested a child and the police came to your door? You should be able to prove your innocence easily, but you'd still be mad as hell that you'd even have to, all because of some pervert.
Prison can be frightening. That's good. Let those lowlifes create their own hell. I worked for two years in the California Penal System. I taught the GED program to convicts. It was actually easier than teaching high school. When I have the authority to give the cons three days in the hole, on my say so alone, believe me, most of them are going to follow my classroom rules and do their work.
When I first started working there, I noticed some cons were wearing special coveralls with the letters PC on the back. This doesn't stand for 'politically correct'. It stands for 'protective custody'. This means you are under surveillance much more than ordinary cons, and they don't mix with the general prison population. Most of these PCs are convicted pedophiles. The reason for them being in protective custody is that if the regular cons find out what these creatures are, they'll be killed. That tells you something right there. If a whole prison full of scumbags considers pedophiles to be lowlifes, that's pretty low!
Monday, July 19, 2010
MOST HOMOSEXUALS ARE CHILD PREDATORS
At one time, not all that long ago, homosexuality was not tolerated
in our society. They were considered mentally ill, and the act of Sodomy was illegal in all 50 states. At that time, homosexuals usually 'stayed in the closet'. In other words, they concealed their perversions out of fear of arrest or institutionalisation. However, little by little, creeping through the body of our society like a cancer, this began to change. First, the act of Sodomy began to be decriminilised state, by state. Then, homosexuality itself was removed from the APA DSM's list of mental illnesses. Then, Gays gained more and more rights and protections under the law. They even have gotten intimidation and violent crimes against them to be classified as 'hate crimes'.
Since homosexuals have now achieved a 'protected status' from both state and the federal governments, more Gays than ever before, are now 'out of the closet'. Many parents fear their children could be molested, encouraged to become sexually active, or even recruited into this disgusting lifestyle by homosexual predators, also known as 'Chicken Hawks'. Indeed, crimes against children are on the rise, hence the passing of new laws, such as 'Megan's Law.'
MALES COMMIT MORE SEX CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN THAN FEMALES
The Gay Community dismisses these fears as being completely homophobic in nature. They insist there is absolutely no connection between homosexuality and child-molestation. If this is so, why do a disproportionately large number of Gay men seek teenage boys as sexual partners? Add to this the fact that less than one percent of convicted child molesters are women. The majority are men, although some of their victims are little girls, the majority are boys. Since Gay men are attracted to other males, it is logical to conclude that there are more Gay men convicted of child molestation than Straight men. Arrest records bear this out.
An essay on sex crimes against children entitled, "Sexual Offending Against Children" reported, It is widely believed that the vast majority of sexual abuse is perpetrated by males and that the female sex offenders only account for a tiny proportion of offenses. With 3000 adult male sex offenders in prison in England and Wales at any one time, the corresponding figure for female sex offenders is 12!"
A report by the American Professional Society On The Abuse Of Children states, "In both clinical and non-clinical samples, the vast majority of offenders are male."
A study in the Journal Of Sex Research states, "Pedophilia is extremely rare in women."
The Gay Community denies a connection, but the arrest records bear it out, and psychologists, who are usually allies of homosexuals also confirm this. They also confirm that the majority of the victims are
male.
A study of 457 male sex offenders against children in the Journal Of Sex And Marital Therapy found that "Approximately one third of these sexual offenders directed their sexual activity against males."
The Journal Of Child Psychiatry stated, "It was commonly believed fifteen years ago that girls were abused in excess of boys in a ratio of about nine to one, but but contemporary studies now indicate that the ratio of girls to boys abused has narrowed remarkably. The majority of community studies suggest a ratio of two to four." Boys are abused twice as much as girls.
WHY ARE WE JUST LEARNING THIS NOW?
Scientist now believe that it has always been this way. The problem for them was in times past, fewer cases of homosexual abuse was reported. Homosexuality had always been considered indecent by society. Gays were labelled as 'fruits', 'faggots', and 'sissies'. Even today amongst children, about the worst name one boy can call another is 'fag'. How many times have we, as adults heard our children say to other children in a derogatory tone something like, "Man, that is so Gay!"
Because of this, when a boy was abused, he was often too ashamed and humiliated to tell anyone. Fear of being labelled a 'fag' kept him silent. However, as homosexuality has moved into the mainstream of society, more and more boys are finding the courage to come forward.
The Department Of Justice's report on child sexual exploitation states, "Adolescent boy victims are highly likely to deny certain types of sexual activity. They are embarrassed and ashamed of their behaviour and rightfully believe that society will not understand their victimization."
The Journal Of Child Psychology adds, "Boys are usually encultured into an ethos where self-reliance, independence and sexual prowess are valued, while showing hurt or homosexuality are denigrated. This may lead to powerful repression or deletion of the experience, with failure to report."
This is very understandable. The last thing any teenage boy wants to be thought of is queer. Even homosexual teenagers fear this due to harassment, intimidation, and violence. Most Gays don't admit their perversions until adulthood.
FACT: HOMOSEXUALS REPRESENT THE VAST MAJORITY OF CONVICTED PEDOPHILES
The Psychiatric Journal Of The University Of Ottowa [Canada] noted that nearly half of convicted pedophiles preferred boys.
The Archives Of Sexual Behaviour also states homosexual pedophiles are vastly overrepresented in child sex offenses cases.
Homosexuals only make up about three percent of the population (contrary to the more popular, but inaccurate ten percent). However, a study conducted by the journal of Child Abuse And Neglect found that fourteen percent targeted only males, and a further twenty eight percent target both sexes, bringing the total of Gay and Bisexual offenders to forty two percent.
Gays and Bisexuals account for only a small percentage of the population, but account for nearly half of the cases. It should also be noted that, although this is no excuse, at least half of the heterosexuals convicted of molesting little girls did it, not for sexual gratification, but in the production of child pornography, which is technically a separate crime. Indeed many Straights convicted of such offenses stated they preferred women, but did what they did to make money. Unfortunately, there is a lot of money to be made in that filthy business. On the other hand, while some homosexuals molested little boys for the purposes of pornography, the majority did it simply for sexual gratification.
GAY ACTIVISTS DEMAND THE LEGALISATION OF PEDOPHILIA
David Thorstad, former president of the New York Gay Activist's Alliance, officially opposes age of consent laws which prohibit adults from having sex with children. This vile, disgusting piece of filth is an admitted pedophile, and founding member of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA). It's incredible that vermin like this are allowed to run around free, but considering the times we live in, it shouldn't be much of a surprise.
Thorstad argues that there is a natural attraction between homosexual men and young boys. He has expressed bitterness that the homosexual rights movement has abandoned pedophiles. But there has always been reluctance on the part of the mainstream Gay Rights movement to accept pedophiles, especially Lesbian groups.
The Lesbian Feminist Liberation movement has officially accused NAMBLA of, "attempting to legitimize sex between children and adults. Feminists easily recognise this as the latest attempt to make palatable the sexual exploitation of children." They also officially condemn heterosexual pedophilia. It seems that even Lesbians have a little motherly instinct in them.
MOST HOMOSEXUALS AT LEAST TOLERATE PEDOPHILES
Despite some opposition, Thorstad claimed that by 1985, pedophiles had won acceptance within the Gay community. Jim Kepner, the then curator of the International Gay and Lesbian Archives in Los Angeles remarked, "A point I've been trying to make is
that if we reject the boylovers in our midst today we'd better stop waving the banner of the Ancient Greeks [Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and Alexander The Great were all admitted homosexuals – author's note], Michelangelo, Leonardo Da Vinci, Oscar Wilde, Walt Whitman, Horatio Alger, and Shakespeare. We'd better stop claiming them as part of our heritage unless we are broadening our concept of what it means to be Gay today."
I would like to point out to the reader, that contrary to what Mr. Kepner said, it has NEVER been proven that Shakespeare or Da Vinci were Gay. Simply because they never married, and had no known "lady friends" is supposition, not proof. There are some individuals who seem to care very little about having sex. The other names mentioned were all known or admitted homosexuals.
Eventually, NAMBLA was officially recognised by Gay Right's groups. However in 1990, this cost the Gay And Lesbian Association its status. The United Nations refused to recognise them as a Non-Governmental Political Organisation because they were protecting admitted criminals (pedophiles) and admitting them as members.
The Gay and Lesbian Association eventually divorced themselves from NAMBLA, and regained partial acceptance from the U.N. However, many countries, Islamic States in particular are still wary of them and have outlawed them in their countries. The GLA still refuses to allow foreign governments access to their membership lists, so it is suspected that they have not severed all ties to pedophile groups, and indeed still have members who are known to them to be pedophiles.
FACT: MOST CHILDREN WHO ARE VICTIMS OF BOTH SEXUAL AND NON-SEXUAL ABUSE GROW UP TO BE ABUSERS THEMSELVES
There is a great deal of evidence that most homosexuals were themselves abused as children. This abuse may have the result of leading them toward homosexuality and/or pedophilia. This is what is often referred to as a vicious cycle.
The Journal Of The American Medical Association did a study of 279 homosexual and bisexual men and reported, "More than half of the subjects reported a sexual act with a male by the age of 16 years, approximately 20 percent by the age of ten years."
A study conducted by the International Journal Of Offender Therapy And Comparative Criminology reported, "In the case of childhood sexual experiences prior to the age of fourteen, 40 percent reported that they had engaged very often in sexual activity with an adult, with 28 percent stating that this type of activity had occurred 'sometimes.' "
The National Institute Of Justice reported, "The odds that a childhood sexual abuse victim will be arrested as an adult for any sex crime is 4.7 times higher than people who experienced no victimization as children."
HOMOSEXUAL AND HETEROSEXUAL PEDOPHILE EMPLOYMENT CHOICES
Pedophiles often seek employment as teachers, counsellors, or clergymen. These are what are known as "positions of special trust."
This way, they put themselves into close contact with children, and are often alone with them for extended periods of time.
THE CLERGY
Most of us are aware of the child molestation scandals that have rocked the Catholic Church in recent years. Victims are coming forward, sometimes as much as 20 years later. However, it should be pointed out, they many of these 'victims' came forward AFTER the first few victims sued the Church and won large sums of money. Many of the later so-called victims have been proven liars with the goal of extorting large judgements from the Church, ruining the reputations of innocent clergymen in the process. But most are sincere and are telling the truth. Many Gay pedophiles entered the priesthood so they would be in a position to victimize young boys (usually alter boys or members of the choir) with impunity. Fortunately, more and more of these vermin are being exposed. We must however be careful and determine which 'victims' are seeking justice, and which are liars seeking money.
It is sad to learn that priests who are accused, and even convicted of child molestation are NOT removed from the priesthood. Many are transferred out of the country, and are still allowed to work closely with children. The Church, unfortunately usually tries to do whatever it can to keep things as quiet as possible, so as not to tarnish the Church's image, not to mention saving them the cost of a lawsuit.
EDUCATORS
School is an excellent venue for a Chicken Hawk to hunt for prey. Teachers are alone with their students for hours. When a teacher asks a student to see him after class, he may have more than the discussion of schoolwork in mind.
I am a former high school English teacher. I never allowed myself to be alone with any student. Not that I was trying to avoid temptation, but I was concerned over a possible misunderstanding, so I always spoke to a student 'alone' in front of a wide-open door with plenty of passers-by who could see us. Since the school board always errs on the side of caution in these matters, so better safe than sorry!
However, I was very distressed to learn that only 40 percent of teachers and other school personnel accused of sexual misconduct were terminated (most were non-tenured teachers or substitutes). Sixty percent were transferred to desk jobs where they would not be coming into contact with children.
COUNSELLORS
What better place to molest a child than when they're at summer camp. Becoming a Boy Scout Camp Counsellor or Troop Leader is a homosexual pedophiles dream come true. In the beginning, known or admitted homosexuals were disqualified from becoming Scout leaders. The first time Gay Rights Activists took this to the United States Supreme Court, they lost. The High Court said that since the Scouts were a private organisation, they were within their rights. When this issue was brought again to the Court in the 1990's, the decision was reversed. The Court said that to bar homosexuals from any non-religious organisation for no other reason than the fact that the person in question is Gay is clearly a violation of his Constitutional rights under the amended 1964 Civil Rights Act which guarantees that no person shall be discriminated against, "because of race, colour, creed, or sexual orientation."
MEDICAL PROFESSION
If you're a pedophile, and a doctor, nurse or medical assistant, and you're alone in an examining room with a child, and you can say, "Take off your clothes." You're in pervert paradise.
Fortunately, the American Medical Association takes sexual improprieties with children or adults extremely seriously. If you get caught with 'your hand in the cookie jar', so to speak, not only could you face criminal charges, plus you could lose your licence. Especially for doctors, this is no small matter. Most homo doctors behave themselves, but every now and again you hear about a case. The Law and the AMA usually move quickly on these scum.
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES
It has only been about twenty years since the courts started to fully appreciate the seriousness of this problem. Until about 1990, in most states in this country, child molestation was a misdemeanor. There was one case in San Diego, California in 1975 of a pedophile who was convicted five times for molesting boys. His first sentence was probation for a year. Second was 30 days. Third was 90 days. Fourth was six months. His fifth was one year in county jail, of which he served seven months. Can you believe that comrades? Seven months for utterly destroying a child's life forever. In my opinion, hanging would have been too good for that piece of filth!
Now the courts are beginning to realise what these animals are. Now they are meting out much more serious punishment. If they want some kind of psychiatric help, they get it, but they still have to sit out their sentences. Thanks to Megan's Law, when they do get out, they have to register themselves as a sex offender for life.
Before Megan's Law, they only had to register as long as they were on parole or probation. Before the computer age, they could easily drop out of sight, use a false name and start again somewhere else. Thankfully, it's more difficult these days to adopt a false identity, which is one reason we must protect ourselves from identity theft. Credit card fraud accounts for only 40 percent of identity thefts. Many of these cases are child molesters trying to drop out of sight so they can more easily victimize children again. How would you feel if you found out someone stole your identity and molested a child and the police came to your door? You should be able to prove your innocence easily, but you'd still be mad as hell that you'd even have to, all because of some pervert.
Prison can be frightening. That's good. Let those lowlifes create their own hell. I worked for two years in the California Penal System. I taught the GED program to convicts. It was actually easier than teaching high school. When I have the authority to give the cons three days in the hole, on my say so alone, believe me, most of them are going to follow my classroom rules and do their work.
When I first started working there, I noticed some cons were wearing special coveralls with the letters PC on the back. This doesn't stand for 'politically correct'. It stands for 'protective custody'. This means you are under surveillance much more than ordinary cons, and they don't mix with the general prison population. Most of these PCs are convicted pedophiles. The reason for them being in protective custody is that if the regular cons find out what these creatures are, they'll be killed. That tells you something right there. If a whole prison full of scumbags considers pedophiles to be lowlifes, that's pretty low!
in our society. They were considered mentally ill, and the act of Sodomy was illegal in all 50 states. At that time, homosexuals usually 'stayed in the closet'. In other words, they concealed their perversions out of fear of arrest or institutionalisation. However, little by little, creeping through the body of our society like a cancer, this began to change. First, the act of Sodomy began to be decriminilised state, by state. Then, homosexuality itself was removed from the APA DSM's list of mental illnesses. Then, Gays gained more and more rights and protections under the law. They even have gotten intimidation and violent crimes against them to be classified as 'hate crimes'.
Since homosexuals have now achieved a 'protected status' from both state and the federal governments, more Gays than ever before, are now 'out of the closet'. Many parents fear their children could be molested, encouraged to become sexually active, or even recruited into this disgusting lifestyle by homosexual predators, also known as 'Chicken Hawks'. Indeed, crimes against children are on the rise, hence the passing of new laws, such as 'Megan's Law.'
MALES COMMIT MORE SEX CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN THAN FEMALES
The Gay Community dismisses these fears as being completely homophobic in nature. They insist there is absolutely no connection between homosexuality and child-molestation. If this is so, why do a disproportionately large number of Gay men seek teenage boys as sexual partners? Add to this the fact that less than one percent of convicted child molesters are women. The majority are men, although some of their victims are little girls, the majority are boys. Since Gay men are attracted to other males, it is logical to conclude that there are more Gay men convicted of child molestation than Straight men. Arrest records bear this out.
An essay on sex crimes against children entitled, "Sexual Offending Against Children" reported, It is widely believed that the vast majority of sexual abuse is perpetrated by males and that the female sex offenders only account for a tiny proportion of offenses. With 3000 adult male sex offenders in prison in England and Wales at any one time, the corresponding figure for female sex offenders is 12!"
A report by the American Professional Society On The Abuse Of Children states, "In both clinical and non-clinical samples, the vast majority of offenders are male."
A study in the Journal Of Sex Research states, "Pedophilia is extremely rare in women."
The Gay Community denies a connection, but the arrest records bear it out, and psychologists, who are usually allies of homosexuals also confirm this. They also confirm that the majority of the victims are
male.
A study of 457 male sex offenders against children in the Journal Of Sex And Marital Therapy found that "Approximately one third of these sexual offenders directed their sexual activity against males."
The Journal Of Child Psychiatry stated, "It was commonly believed fifteen years ago that girls were abused in excess of boys in a ratio of about nine to one, but but contemporary studies now indicate that the ratio of girls to boys abused has narrowed remarkably. The majority of community studies suggest a ratio of two to four." Boys are abused twice as much as girls.
WHY ARE WE JUST LEARNING THIS NOW?
Scientist now believe that it has always been this way. The problem for them was in times past, fewer cases of homosexual abuse was reported. Homosexuality had always been considered indecent by society. Gays were labelled as 'fruits', 'faggots', and 'sissies'. Even today amongst children, about the worst name one boy can call another is 'fag'. How many times have we, as adults heard our children say to other children in a derogatory tone something like, "Man, that is so Gay!"
Because of this, when a boy was abused, he was often too ashamed and humiliated to tell anyone. Fear of being labelled a 'fag' kept him silent. However, as homosexuality has moved into the mainstream of society, more and more boys are finding the courage to come forward.
The Department Of Justice's report on child sexual exploitation states, "Adolescent boy victims are highly likely to deny certain types of sexual activity. They are embarrassed and ashamed of their behaviour and rightfully believe that society will not understand their victimization."
The Journal Of Child Psychology adds, "Boys are usually encultured into an ethos where self-reliance, independence and sexual prowess are valued, while showing hurt or homosexuality are denigrated. This may lead to powerful repression or deletion of the experience, with failure to report."
This is very understandable. The last thing any teenage boy wants to be thought of is queer. Even homosexual teenagers fear this due to harassment, intimidation, and violence. Most Gays don't admit their perversions until adulthood.
FACT: HOMOSEXUALS REPRESENT THE VAST MAJORITY OF CONVICTED PEDOPHILES
The Psychiatric Journal Of The University Of Ottowa [Canada] noted that nearly half of convicted pedophiles preferred boys.
The Archives Of Sexual Behaviour also states homosexual pedophiles are vastly overrepresented in child sex offenses cases.
Homosexuals only make up about three percent of the population (contrary to the more popular, but inaccurate ten percent). However, a study conducted by the journal of Child Abuse And Neglect found that fourteen percent targeted only males, and a further twenty eight percent target both sexes, bringing the total of Gay and Bisexual offenders to forty two percent.
Gays and Bisexuals account for only a small percentage of the population, but account for nearly half of the cases. It should also be noted that, although this is no excuse, at least half of the heterosexuals convicted of molesting little girls did it, not for sexual gratification, but in the production of child pornography, which is technically a separate crime. Indeed many Straights convicted of such offenses stated they preferred women, but did what they did to make money. Unfortunately, there is a lot of money to be made in that filthy business. On the other hand, while some homosexuals molested little boys for the purposes of pornography, the majority did it simply for sexual gratification.
GAY ACTIVISTS DEMAND THE LEGALISATION OF PEDOPHILIA
David Thorstad, former president of the New York Gay Activist's Alliance, officially opposes age of consent laws which prohibit adults from having sex with children. This vile, disgusting piece of filth is an admitted pedophile, and founding member of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA). It's incredible that vermin like this are allowed to run around free, but considering the times we live in, it shouldn't be much of a surprise.
Thorstad argues that there is a natural attraction between homosexual men and young boys. He has expressed bitterness that the homosexual rights movement has abandoned pedophiles. But there has always been reluctance on the part of the mainstream Gay Rights movement to accept pedophiles, especially Lesbian groups.
The Lesbian Feminist Liberation movement has officially accused NAMBLA of, "attempting to legitimize sex between children and adults. Feminists easily recognise this as the latest attempt to make palatable the sexual exploitation of children." They also officially condemn heterosexual pedophilia. It seems that even Lesbians have a little motherly instinct in them.
MOST HOMOSEXUALS AT LEAST TOLERATE PEDOPHILES
Despite some opposition, Thorstad claimed that by 1985, pedophiles had won acceptance within the Gay community. Jim Kepner, the then curator of the International Gay and Lesbian Archives in Los Angeles remarked, "A point I've been trying to make is
that if we reject the boylovers in our midst today we'd better stop waving the banner of the Ancient Greeks [Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and Alexander The Great were all admitted homosexuals – author's note], Michelangelo, Leonardo Da Vinci, Oscar Wilde, Walt Whitman, Horatio Alger, and Shakespeare. We'd better stop claiming them as part of our heritage unless we are broadening our concept of what it means to be Gay today."
I would like to point out to the reader, that contrary to what Mr. Kepner said, it has NEVER been proven that Shakespeare or Da Vinci were Gay. Simply because they never married, and had no known "lady friends" is supposition, not proof. There are some individuals who seem to care very little about having sex. The other names mentioned were all known or admitted homosexuals.
Eventually, NAMBLA was officially recognised by Gay Right's groups. However in 1990, this cost the Gay And Lesbian Association its status. The United Nations refused to recognise them as a Non-Governmental Political Organisation because they were protecting admitted criminals (pedophiles) and admitting them as members.
The Gay and Lesbian Association eventually divorced themselves from NAMBLA, and regained partial acceptance from the U.N. However, many countries, Islamic States in particular are still wary of them and have outlawed them in their countries. The GLA still refuses to allow foreign governments access to their membership lists, so it is suspected that they have not severed all ties to pedophile groups, and indeed still have members who are known to them to be pedophiles.
FACT: MOST CHILDREN WHO ARE VICTIMS OF BOTH SEXUAL AND NON-SEXUAL ABUSE GROW UP TO BE ABUSERS THEMSELVES
There is a great deal of evidence that most homosexuals were themselves abused as children. This abuse may have the result of leading them toward homosexuality and/or pedophilia. This is what is often referred to as a vicious cycle.
The Journal Of The American Medical Association did a study of 279 homosexual and bisexual men and reported, "More than half of the subjects reported a sexual act with a male by the age of 16 years, approximately 20 percent by the age of ten years."
A study conducted by the International Journal Of Offender Therapy And Comparative Criminology reported, "In the case of childhood sexual experiences prior to the age of fourteen, 40 percent reported that they had engaged very often in sexual activity with an adult, with 28 percent stating that this type of activity had occurred 'sometimes.' "
The National Institute Of Justice reported, "The odds that a childhood sexual abuse victim will be arrested as an adult for any sex crime is 4.7 times higher than people who experienced no victimization as children."
HOMOSEXUAL AND HETEROSEXUAL PEDOPHILE EMPLOYMENT CHOICES
Pedophiles often seek employment as teachers, counsellors, or clergymen. These are what are known as "positions of special trust."
This way, they put themselves into close contact with children, and are often alone with them for extended periods of time.
THE CLERGY
Most of us are aware of the child molestation scandals that have rocked the Catholic Church in recent years. Victims are coming forward, sometimes as much as 20 years later. However, it should be pointed out, they many of these 'victims' came forward AFTER the first few victims sued the Church and won large sums of money. Many of the later so-called victims have been proven liars with the goal of extorting large judgements from the Church, ruining the reputations of innocent clergymen in the process. But most are sincere and are telling the truth. Many Gay pedophiles entered the priesthood so they would be in a position to victimize young boys (usually alter boys or members of the choir) with impunity. Fortunately, more and more of these vermin are being exposed. We must however be careful and determine which 'victims' are seeking justice, and which are liars seeking money.
It is sad to learn that priests who are accused, and even convicted of child molestation are NOT removed from the priesthood. Many are transferred out of the country, and are still allowed to work closely with children. The Church, unfortunately usually tries to do whatever it can to keep things as quiet as possible, so as not to tarnish the Church's image, not to mention saving them the cost of a lawsuit.
EDUCATORS
School is an excellent venue for a Chicken Hawk to hunt for prey. Teachers are alone with their students for hours. When a teacher asks a student to see him after class, he may have more than the discussion of schoolwork in mind.
I am a former high school English teacher. I never allowed myself to be alone with any student. Not that I was trying to avoid temptation, but I was concerned over a possible misunderstanding, so I always spoke to a student 'alone' in front of a wide-open door with plenty of passers-by who could see us. Since the school board always errs on the side of caution in these matters, so better safe than sorry!
However, I was very distressed to learn that only 40 percent of teachers and other school personnel accused of sexual misconduct were terminated (most were non-tenured teachers or substitutes). Sixty percent were transferred to desk jobs where they would not be coming into contact with children.
COUNSELLORS
What better place to molest a child than when they're at summer camp. Becoming a Boy Scout Camp Counsellor or Troop Leader is a homosexual pedophiles dream come true. In the beginning, known or admitted homosexuals were disqualified from becoming Scout leaders. The first time Gay Rights Activists took this to the United States Supreme Court, they lost. The High Court said that since the Scouts were a private organisation, they were within their rights. When this issue was brought again to the Court in the 1990's, the decision was reversed. The Court said that to bar homosexuals from any non-religious organisation for no other reason than the fact that the person in question is Gay is clearly a violation of his Constitutional rights under the amended 1964 Civil Rights Act which guarantees that no person shall be discriminated against, "because of race, colour, creed, or sexual orientation."
MEDICAL PROFESSION
If you're a pedophile, and a doctor, nurse or medical assistant, and you're alone in an examining room with a child, and you can say, "Take off your clothes." You're in pervert paradise.
Fortunately, the American Medical Association takes sexual improprieties with children or adults extremely seriously. If you get caught with 'your hand in the cookie jar', so to speak, not only could you face criminal charges, plus you could lose your licence. Especially for doctors, this is no small matter. Most homo doctors behave themselves, but every now and again you hear about a case. The Law and the AMA usually move quickly on these scum.
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES
It has only been about twenty years since the courts started to fully appreciate the seriousness of this problem. Until about 1990, in most states in this country, child molestation was a misdemeanor. There was one case in San Diego, California in 1975 of a pedophile who was convicted five times for molesting boys. His first sentence was probation for a year. Second was 30 days. Third was 90 days. Fourth was six months. His fifth was one year in county jail, of which he served seven months. Can you believe that comrades? Seven months for utterly destroying a child's life forever. In my opinion, hanging would have been too good for that piece of filth!
Now the courts are beginning to realise what these animals are. Now they are meting out much more serious punishment. If they want some kind of psychiatric help, they get it, but they still have to sit out their sentences. Thanks to Megan's Law, when they do get out, they have to register themselves as a sex offender for life.
Before Megan's Law, they only had to register as long as they were on parole or probation. Before the computer age, they could easily drop out of sight, use a false name and start again somewhere else. Thankfully, it's more difficult these days to adopt a false identity, which is one reason we must protect ourselves from identity theft. Credit card fraud accounts for only 40 percent of identity thefts. Many of these cases are child molesters trying to drop out of sight so they can more easily victimize children again. How would you feel if you found out someone stole your identity and molested a child and the police came to your door? You should be able to prove your innocence easily, but you'd still be mad as hell that you'd even have to, all because of some pervert.
Prison can be frightening. That's good. Let those lowlifes create their own hell. I worked for two years in the California Penal System. I taught the GED program to convicts. It was actually easier than teaching high school. When I have the authority to give the cons three days in the hole, on my say so alone, believe me, most of them are going to follow my classroom rules and do their work.
When I first started working there, I noticed some cons were wearing special coveralls with the letters PC on the back. This doesn't stand for 'politically correct'. It stands for 'protective custody'. This means you are under surveillance much more than ordinary cons, and they don't mix with the general prison population. Most of these PCs are convicted pedophiles. The reason for them being in protective custody is that if the regular cons find out what these creatures are, they'll be killed. That tells you something right there. If a whole prison full of scumbags considers pedophiles to be lowlifes, that's pretty low!
Sunday, July 18, 2010
THE RIGHT TO MARRY
Our society is disintegrating rapidly, and the homosexual agenda, which is only a small part of the larger Jewish agenda is accelerating this. The Jews are attacking Aryan culture from many sides: Politics, economics, art, literature, the media, and through this perverted lifestyle our most important institution – the family. Now they are demanding the right to marry. Several states, such as Massachusetts have already legalised same-sex marriages. A few years ago, California, a state known for being liberal, surprisingly passed a law which said only a marriage between a man and a woman would be recognised.
Gay activists immediately challenged this law, which was passed, not by the legislature, but by a vote of the people of California. It was later struck down by the State Supreme Court as being unconstitutional. As a result, for a brief time, same-sex marriage was legal in California.
Since the law was ruled unconstitutional, that meant of course, that it went against the state constitution. Family rights advocates decided that the only answer would be to amend the constitution so the law would be able to stand. An amendment to the state constitution was drafted, and brought before the people for a vote.
On the ballot, it was referred to as "Proposition Eight". The Gay Rights activists immediately launched a campaign of intimidation. They tried their very best to make the voters feel that if they voted for Proposition Eight, they would be hateful, homophobic bigots. Despite their efforts, the majority of the voters did not cave in to the pressure. They kept their principles and voted for what they felt was right, irregardless of the campaign of hate launched against them.
Fifty eight percent of the people voted 'yes' on Proposition Eight, and the ban on same-sex marriages was restored. In the short time it was legal, hundreds of homosexual couples were married in the state of California. The courts ruled that since these marriages were performed at a time when they were legal, those who were married during this period would remain legally married.
Even though traditional values won out, activists are not giving up. They are preparing to challenge Proposition Eight in federal court as being improperly written, which therefore makes it invalid as a constitutional amendment. If they win, then the amendment would be ruled null and void, and Gay marriages would once again be legal in California.
If the amendment stands, then the issue of marriage for homosexuals is settled in California, until such time as activists can convince the voters to repeal it. If it does stand, the federal government can in no way act against it, as marriage is a state's rights issue, and the U.S. Constitution forbids federal interference (not that that has stopped the feds from violating the Constitution in the past).
If the amendment is invalidated in federal court, family values activists already have plans to redraft the amendment in a way which would conform to the federal ruling. As this ruling has not as yet been made, there is no way to do a redraft in advance, because they won't know how to reword it to conform to the federal court's ruling.
Only time will tell who will win. We can only hope that the drafters of Proposition Eight did their jobs properly. If they did, then all will be well. If they didn't, well, we'll just have to wait and see. But the eyes of the nation are on California on this issue. If we lose this one, then in less than five years same-sex marriage could be legal in all 50 states.
DO HOMOSEXUALS REALLY WANT TO MARRY SO THEY CAN LIVE LIKE 'NORMAL' PEOPLE?
Homosexuals and lesbians claim that they want the right to marry and live like any other couple, and in some cases, perhaps even in the majority of cases they may indeed be sincere. However, a hardcore group of Gay activists have an entirely different agenda in mind. If these fanatics get their way, it could mean the end of marriage as we know it, and a completely new institution, which is based not on traditional values, but the perverted lifestyles of the typical homosexual.
Many Gay activists are beginning to openly admit to this. Michelango Signorile, a homosexual journalist wrote, "homosexuals must fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, redefine the institution of marriage completely. The most subversive action lesbians and gays can undertake – and one that would perhaps benefit all of society – is to transform the notion of 'family' all together.
If they only want to be like other people, why should they want to do this? The family is a father and mother raising their children. How else could it be defined decently? True, you don't have to be related by blood to raise children. Many people adopt kids, and raise them as if they were their own flesh and blood, and that's fine, so long as the parents are moral, upstanding people. Homosexuals are neither moral nor upstanding. To allow them to raise children is child abuse at best, and an atrocity at worst.
Not all Gays want as close to a 'traditional' family as their kind can get. Some want to raise kids as two dads or two moms. That's bad enough, but some of these hardcore degenerates want to raise kids in households with multiple Gay partners, and each of the several partners would be considered as much a parent as any other. Some even feel that if one or two of the adults are indeed the biological parent of one or more of the children, they see no need to inform the child which is his real father, as each partner is considered just as much the father, or mother, for that matter, as every other adult. I should remind the reader that some homosexuals do indeed have children from say, a former marriage before they 'realised' they were Gay, or by a surrogate mother, using the father's own sperm. The same for Lesbians. They will often go to a sperm bank, or get a male friend to impregnate them.
Lesbian activist and professor of law Paul Ettelbrick said, "Being queer is more than setting up house, sleeping with a person of the same gender, and seeking state approval for doing so. Being queer means pushing the parameters of sex, sexuality, and family; and in the process, transforming the very fabric of society. We must keep our eyes on the goals of providing true alternatives to marriage and of radically reordering society's views on marriage."
There are many other examples of well-known activists who have made similar statements. These people are not just John and Jane average homosexuals. They are doctors, lawyers, journalists, authors, and other people of great influence. They are not advocates of marriage, but enemies bent on its destruction. If they succeed, they will replace traditional marriage with something more akin to their own degenerate lifestyles. Something that will totally destroy the morals and values that we, as National Socialists cherish. We cannot allow this to happen. If we give these deviants the same rights and privileges as normal people, then our land will literally become the new Sodam and Gommorah.
In 2008, two female law students in San Diego, Ca., drafted a legislative proposal that would have officially outlawed marriage in the state if it passed. Fortunately, no legislator was even remotely interested. It didn't stand a chance – at this time, at least.
These two women, both of whom claim to be Straight, said they did this because they believe the entire concept of marriage and family to be biased against Gays, and that it was time that this archaic concept was eliminated. So, because a tiny minority feels left out, the rest of us are expected to give up a time-honoured tradition, and live a life of immorality and indecency. Because present-day morals are becoming non-existent, our society is breeding more and more people like these two young girls. It will only get worse unless we restore our traditional values and morals.
One of the current Gay Rights platform demands is: "The repeal of
of all legislative provisions that restrict the sex or number of persons entering into a marriage unit." In other words, the complete legalisation of all perversions. Comrades, we must never allow this to happen.
Gay activists immediately challenged this law, which was passed, not by the legislature, but by a vote of the people of California. It was later struck down by the State Supreme Court as being unconstitutional. As a result, for a brief time, same-sex marriage was legal in California.
Since the law was ruled unconstitutional, that meant of course, that it went against the state constitution. Family rights advocates decided that the only answer would be to amend the constitution so the law would be able to stand. An amendment to the state constitution was drafted, and brought before the people for a vote.
On the ballot, it was referred to as "Proposition Eight". The Gay Rights activists immediately launched a campaign of intimidation. They tried their very best to make the voters feel that if they voted for Proposition Eight, they would be hateful, homophobic bigots. Despite their efforts, the majority of the voters did not cave in to the pressure. They kept their principles and voted for what they felt was right, irregardless of the campaign of hate launched against them.
Fifty eight percent of the people voted 'yes' on Proposition Eight, and the ban on same-sex marriages was restored. In the short time it was legal, hundreds of homosexual couples were married in the state of California. The courts ruled that since these marriages were performed at a time when they were legal, those who were married during this period would remain legally married.
Even though traditional values won out, activists are not giving up. They are preparing to challenge Proposition Eight in federal court as being improperly written, which therefore makes it invalid as a constitutional amendment. If they win, then the amendment would be ruled null and void, and Gay marriages would once again be legal in California.
If the amendment stands, then the issue of marriage for homosexuals is settled in California, until such time as activists can convince the voters to repeal it. If it does stand, the federal government can in no way act against it, as marriage is a state's rights issue, and the U.S. Constitution forbids federal interference (not that that has stopped the feds from violating the Constitution in the past).
If the amendment is invalidated in federal court, family values activists already have plans to redraft the amendment in a way which would conform to the federal ruling. As this ruling has not as yet been made, there is no way to do a redraft in advance, because they won't know how to reword it to conform to the federal court's ruling.
Only time will tell who will win. We can only hope that the drafters of Proposition Eight did their jobs properly. If they did, then all will be well. If they didn't, well, we'll just have to wait and see. But the eyes of the nation are on California on this issue. If we lose this one, then in less than five years same-sex marriage could be legal in all 50 states.
DO HOMOSEXUALS REALLY WANT TO MARRY SO THEY CAN LIVE LIKE 'NORMAL' PEOPLE?
Homosexuals and lesbians claim that they want the right to marry and live like any other couple, and in some cases, perhaps even in the majority of cases they may indeed be sincere. However, a hardcore group of Gay activists have an entirely different agenda in mind. If these fanatics get their way, it could mean the end of marriage as we know it, and a completely new institution, which is based not on traditional values, but the perverted lifestyles of the typical homosexual.
Many Gay activists are beginning to openly admit to this. Michelango Signorile, a homosexual journalist wrote, "homosexuals must fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, redefine the institution of marriage completely. The most subversive action lesbians and gays can undertake – and one that would perhaps benefit all of society – is to transform the notion of 'family' all together.
If they only want to be like other people, why should they want to do this? The family is a father and mother raising their children. How else could it be defined decently? True, you don't have to be related by blood to raise children. Many people adopt kids, and raise them as if they were their own flesh and blood, and that's fine, so long as the parents are moral, upstanding people. Homosexuals are neither moral nor upstanding. To allow them to raise children is child abuse at best, and an atrocity at worst.
Not all Gays want as close to a 'traditional' family as their kind can get. Some want to raise kids as two dads or two moms. That's bad enough, but some of these hardcore degenerates want to raise kids in households with multiple Gay partners, and each of the several partners would be considered as much a parent as any other. Some even feel that if one or two of the adults are indeed the biological parent of one or more of the children, they see no need to inform the child which is his real father, as each partner is considered just as much the father, or mother, for that matter, as every other adult. I should remind the reader that some homosexuals do indeed have children from say, a former marriage before they 'realised' they were Gay, or by a surrogate mother, using the father's own sperm. The same for Lesbians. They will often go to a sperm bank, or get a male friend to impregnate them.
Lesbian activist and professor of law Paul Ettelbrick said, "Being queer is more than setting up house, sleeping with a person of the same gender, and seeking state approval for doing so. Being queer means pushing the parameters of sex, sexuality, and family; and in the process, transforming the very fabric of society. We must keep our eyes on the goals of providing true alternatives to marriage and of radically reordering society's views on marriage."
There are many other examples of well-known activists who have made similar statements. These people are not just John and Jane average homosexuals. They are doctors, lawyers, journalists, authors, and other people of great influence. They are not advocates of marriage, but enemies bent on its destruction. If they succeed, they will replace traditional marriage with something more akin to their own degenerate lifestyles. Something that will totally destroy the morals and values that we, as National Socialists cherish. We cannot allow this to happen. If we give these deviants the same rights and privileges as normal people, then our land will literally become the new Sodam and Gommorah.
In 2008, two female law students in San Diego, Ca., drafted a legislative proposal that would have officially outlawed marriage in the state if it passed. Fortunately, no legislator was even remotely interested. It didn't stand a chance – at this time, at least.
These two women, both of whom claim to be Straight, said they did this because they believe the entire concept of marriage and family to be biased against Gays, and that it was time that this archaic concept was eliminated. So, because a tiny minority feels left out, the rest of us are expected to give up a time-honoured tradition, and live a life of immorality and indecency. Because present-day morals are becoming non-existent, our society is breeding more and more people like these two young girls. It will only get worse unless we restore our traditional values and morals.
One of the current Gay Rights platform demands is: "The repeal of
of all legislative provisions that restrict the sex or number of persons entering into a marriage unit." In other words, the complete legalisation of all perversions. Comrades, we must never allow this to happen.
THE RIGHT TO MARRY
Our society is disintegrating rapidly, and the homosexual agenda, which is only a small part of the larger Jewish agenda is accelerating this. The Jews are attacking Aryan culture from many sides: Politics, economics, art, literature, the media, and through this perverted lifestyle our most important institution – the family. Now they are demanding the right to marry. Several states, such as Massachusetts have already legalised same-sex marriages. A few years ago, California, a state known for being liberal, surprisingly passed a law which said only a marriage between a man and a woman would be recognised.
Gay activists immediately challenged this law, which was passed, not by the legislature, but by a vote of the people of California. It was later struck down by the State Supreme Court as being unconstitutional. As a result, for a brief time, same-sex marriage was legal in California.
Since the law was ruled unconstitutional, that meant of course, that it went against the state constitution. Family rights advocates decided that the only answer would be to amend the constitution so the law would be able to stand. An amendment to the state constitution was drafted, and brought before the people for a vote.
On the ballot, it was referred to as "Proposition Eight". The Gay Rights activists immediately launched a campaign of intimidation. They tried their very best to make the voters feel that if they voted for Proposition Eight, they would be hateful, homophobic bigots. Despite their efforts, the majority of the voters did not cave in to the pressure. They kept their principles and voted for what they felt was right, irregardless of the campaign of hate launched against them.
Fifty eight percent of the people voted 'yes' on Proposition Eight, and the ban on same-sex marriages was restored. In the short time it was legal, hundreds of homosexual couples were married in the state of California. The courts ruled that since these marriages were performed at a time when they were legal, those who were married during this period would remain legally married.
Even though traditional values won out, activists are not giving up. They are preparing to challenge Proposition Eight in federal court as being improperly written, which therefore makes it invalid as a constitutional amendment. If they win, then the amendment would be ruled null and void, and Gay marriages would once again be legal in California.
If the amendment stands, then the issue of marriage for homosexuals is settled in California, until such time as activists can convince the voters to repeal it. If it does stand, the federal government can in no way act against it, as marriage is a state's rights issue, and the U.S. Constitution forbids federal interference (not that that has stopped the feds from violating the Constitution in the past).
If the amendment is invalidated in federal court, family values activists already have plans to redraft the amendment in a way which would conform to the federal ruling. As this ruling has not as yet been made, there is no way to do a redraft in advance, because they won't know how to reword it to conform to the federal court's ruling.
Only time will tell who will win. We can only hope that the drafters of Proposition Eight did their jobs properly. If they did, then all will be well. If they didn't, well, we'll just have to wait and see. But the eyes of the nation are on California on this issue. If we lose this one, then in less than five years same-sex marriage could be legal in all 50 states.
DO HOMOSEXUALS REALLY WANT TO MARRY SO THEY CAN LIVE LIKE 'NORMAL' PEOPLE?
Homosexuals and lesbians claim that they want the right to marry and live like any other couple, and in some cases, perhaps even in the majority of cases they may indeed be sincere. However, a hardcore group of Gay activists have an entirely different agenda in mind. If these fanatics get their way, it could mean the end of marriage as we know it, and a completely new institution, which is based not on traditional values, but the perverted lifestyles of the typical homosexual.
Many Gay activists are beginning to openly admit to this. Michelango Signorile, a homosexual journalist wrote, "homosexuals must fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, redefine the institution of marriage completely. The most subversive action lesbians and gays can undertake – and one that would perhaps benefit all of society – is to transform the notion of 'family' all together.
If they only want to be like other people, why should they want to do this? The family is a father and mother raising their children. How else could it be defined decently? True, you don't have to be related by blood to raise children. Many people adopt kids, and raise them as if they were their own flesh and blood, and that's fine, so long as the parents are moral, upstanding people. Homosexuals are neither moral nor upstanding. To allow them to raise children is child abuse at best, and an atrocity at worst.
Not all Gays want as close to a 'traditional' family as their kind can get. Some want to raise kids as two dads or two moms. That's bad enough, but some of these hardcore degenerates want to raise kids in households with multiple Gay partners, and each of the several partners would be considered as much a parent as any other. Some even feel that if one or two of the adults are indeed the biological parent of one or more of the children, they see no need to inform the child which is his real father, as each partner is considered just as much the father, or mother, for that matter, as every other adult. I should remind the reader that some homosexuals do indeed have children from say, a former marriage before they 'realised' they were Gay, or by a surrogate mother, using the father's own sperm. The same for Lesbians. They will often go to a sperm bank, or get a male friend to impregnate them.
Lesbian activist and professor of law Paul Ettelbrick said, "Being queer is more than setting up house, sleeping with a person of the same gender, and seeking state approval for doing so. Being queer means pushing the parameters of sex, sexuality, and family; and in the process, transforming the very fabric of society. We must keep our eyes on the goals of providing true alternatives to marriage and of radically reordering society's views on marriage."
There are many other examples of well-known activists who have made similar statements. These people are not just John and Jane average homosexuals. They are doctors, lawyers, journalists, authors, and other people of great influence. They are not advocates of marriage, but enemies bent on its destruction. If they succeed, they will replace traditional marriage with something more akin to their own degenerate lifestyles. Something that will totally destroy the morals and values that we, as National Socialists cherish. We cannot allow this to happen. If we give these deviants the same rights and privileges as normal people, then our land will literally become the new Sodam and Gommorah.
In 2008, two female law students in San Diego, Ca., drafted a legislative proposal that would have officially outlawed marriage in the state if it passed. Fortunately, no legislator was even remotely interested. It didn't stand a chance – at this time, at least.
These two women, both of whom claim to be Straight, said they did this because they believe the entire concept of marriage and family to be biased against Gays, and that it was time that this archaic concept was eliminated. So, because a tiny minority feels left out, the rest of us are expected to give up a time-honoured tradition, and live a life of immorality and indecency. Because present-day morals are becoming non-existent, our society is breeding more and more people like these two young girls. It will only get worse unless we restore our traditional values and morals.
One of the current Gay Rights platform demands is: "The repeal of
of all legislative provisions that restrict the sex or number of persons entering into a marriage unit." In other words, the complete legalisation of all perversions. Comrades, we must never allow this to happen.
Gay activists immediately challenged this law, which was passed, not by the legislature, but by a vote of the people of California. It was later struck down by the State Supreme Court as being unconstitutional. As a result, for a brief time, same-sex marriage was legal in California.
Since the law was ruled unconstitutional, that meant of course, that it went against the state constitution. Family rights advocates decided that the only answer would be to amend the constitution so the law would be able to stand. An amendment to the state constitution was drafted, and brought before the people for a vote.
On the ballot, it was referred to as "Proposition Eight". The Gay Rights activists immediately launched a campaign of intimidation. They tried their very best to make the voters feel that if they voted for Proposition Eight, they would be hateful, homophobic bigots. Despite their efforts, the majority of the voters did not cave in to the pressure. They kept their principles and voted for what they felt was right, irregardless of the campaign of hate launched against them.
Fifty eight percent of the people voted 'yes' on Proposition Eight, and the ban on same-sex marriages was restored. In the short time it was legal, hundreds of homosexual couples were married in the state of California. The courts ruled that since these marriages were performed at a time when they were legal, those who were married during this period would remain legally married.
Even though traditional values won out, activists are not giving up. They are preparing to challenge Proposition Eight in federal court as being improperly written, which therefore makes it invalid as a constitutional amendment. If they win, then the amendment would be ruled null and void, and Gay marriages would once again be legal in California.
If the amendment stands, then the issue of marriage for homosexuals is settled in California, until such time as activists can convince the voters to repeal it. If it does stand, the federal government can in no way act against it, as marriage is a state's rights issue, and the U.S. Constitution forbids federal interference (not that that has stopped the feds from violating the Constitution in the past).
If the amendment is invalidated in federal court, family values activists already have plans to redraft the amendment in a way which would conform to the federal ruling. As this ruling has not as yet been made, there is no way to do a redraft in advance, because they won't know how to reword it to conform to the federal court's ruling.
Only time will tell who will win. We can only hope that the drafters of Proposition Eight did their jobs properly. If they did, then all will be well. If they didn't, well, we'll just have to wait and see. But the eyes of the nation are on California on this issue. If we lose this one, then in less than five years same-sex marriage could be legal in all 50 states.
DO HOMOSEXUALS REALLY WANT TO MARRY SO THEY CAN LIVE LIKE 'NORMAL' PEOPLE?
Homosexuals and lesbians claim that they want the right to marry and live like any other couple, and in some cases, perhaps even in the majority of cases they may indeed be sincere. However, a hardcore group of Gay activists have an entirely different agenda in mind. If these fanatics get their way, it could mean the end of marriage as we know it, and a completely new institution, which is based not on traditional values, but the perverted lifestyles of the typical homosexual.
Many Gay activists are beginning to openly admit to this. Michelango Signorile, a homosexual journalist wrote, "homosexuals must fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, redefine the institution of marriage completely. The most subversive action lesbians and gays can undertake – and one that would perhaps benefit all of society – is to transform the notion of 'family' all together.
If they only want to be like other people, why should they want to do this? The family is a father and mother raising their children. How else could it be defined decently? True, you don't have to be related by blood to raise children. Many people adopt kids, and raise them as if they were their own flesh and blood, and that's fine, so long as the parents are moral, upstanding people. Homosexuals are neither moral nor upstanding. To allow them to raise children is child abuse at best, and an atrocity at worst.
Not all Gays want as close to a 'traditional' family as their kind can get. Some want to raise kids as two dads or two moms. That's bad enough, but some of these hardcore degenerates want to raise kids in households with multiple Gay partners, and each of the several partners would be considered as much a parent as any other. Some even feel that if one or two of the adults are indeed the biological parent of one or more of the children, they see no need to inform the child which is his real father, as each partner is considered just as much the father, or mother, for that matter, as every other adult. I should remind the reader that some homosexuals do indeed have children from say, a former marriage before they 'realised' they were Gay, or by a surrogate mother, using the father's own sperm. The same for Lesbians. They will often go to a sperm bank, or get a male friend to impregnate them.
Lesbian activist and professor of law Paul Ettelbrick said, "Being queer is more than setting up house, sleeping with a person of the same gender, and seeking state approval for doing so. Being queer means pushing the parameters of sex, sexuality, and family; and in the process, transforming the very fabric of society. We must keep our eyes on the goals of providing true alternatives to marriage and of radically reordering society's views on marriage."
There are many other examples of well-known activists who have made similar statements. These people are not just John and Jane average homosexuals. They are doctors, lawyers, journalists, authors, and other people of great influence. They are not advocates of marriage, but enemies bent on its destruction. If they succeed, they will replace traditional marriage with something more akin to their own degenerate lifestyles. Something that will totally destroy the morals and values that we, as National Socialists cherish. We cannot allow this to happen. If we give these deviants the same rights and privileges as normal people, then our land will literally become the new Sodam and Gommorah.
In 2008, two female law students in San Diego, Ca., drafted a legislative proposal that would have officially outlawed marriage in the state if it passed. Fortunately, no legislator was even remotely interested. It didn't stand a chance – at this time, at least.
These two women, both of whom claim to be Straight, said they did this because they believe the entire concept of marriage and family to be biased against Gays, and that it was time that this archaic concept was eliminated. So, because a tiny minority feels left out, the rest of us are expected to give up a time-honoured tradition, and live a life of immorality and indecency. Because present-day morals are becoming non-existent, our society is breeding more and more people like these two young girls. It will only get worse unless we restore our traditional values and morals.
One of the current Gay Rights platform demands is: "The repeal of
of all legislative provisions that restrict the sex or number of persons entering into a marriage unit." In other words, the complete legalisation of all perversions. Comrades, we must never allow this to happen.
Saturday, July 17, 2010
BORN TO BE GAY?
Interestingly enough, at the beginning of the Gay Rights movement the term "sexual preference" was used frequently. For the past few decades however, this has been changed to "sexual orientation." This was done because the former implied a choice in the matter of sexual behaviours, while the latter implied that these urges are inborn or genetic and cannot be changed.
In 1979, homosexual rights groups lobbied for a congressional bill that stated, in part that in any legislation involving Gay rights, term sexual orientation was to be used, rather than sexual preference. This has given these groups enormous political power. We all have choices. If a criminal carjacks you at gun point and orders you to run down a helpless child or else he'll blow your brains out, you can choose to comply with his demands, or refuse and allow him to kill you. It's the same with sexual preference. You can choose to act on your deviant urges, or suppress them and behave as a heterosexual for the good of society. But claiming homosexuality is inborn or genetic, you can't help yourself, so you're off the hook, so to speak when it comes to choices. Barring illness or accident, we're all going to die of old age, and there is no choice. They claim it is the same with being Gay.
The Gay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender Commission states on its website: "Homosexuality is not a choice, any more than being left-handed or having blues or being heterosexual is a choice. It's an orientation, part of who you are. The choice is in deciding how to live your life."
GAY ALLIES
As was previously stated, the American Psychological Association has confirmed this "born Gay" nonsense. Joining them in the spread of this rubbish is the National Education Association. They sent out a pamphlet to every school superintendent in the country. It was entitled, "Just The Facts", despite that fact that it consisted of nothing but lies, half-truths ans speculations, such as "Sexual orientation is one component of a person's identity, which is made up of other components, such as culture, ethnicity, gender, and personality traits."
This is utter nonsense. There are homosexuals all over the world, composed of every ethnicity, culture, and gender. To say these factors have anything to do with whether a person is more or less likely to be Gay is ridiculous. Of course, anyone who tries to refute these views is immediately accused of suffering from a non-existent mental condition called "homophobia". This is the same tactic as used by the Jews. Anyone who speaks out against the Jews is labelled and Anti-Semite. Anyone who speaks out against Gays is automatically a homophobic. This has the effect of making the general population afraid to speak up out of fear of these rather negative sounding labels. It's been working rather well for the past few decades.
GAY OPPOSITION
In recent years, more and more psychological researchers are beginning to admit that they can find no evidence of the so-called "Gay Gene". The National Association For Research And Therapy Of Homosexuality has published these admissions which state there is absolutely no basis for the belief that people are born Gay or Straight.
One the authors of this report, researcher Dr. Dean Hamer stated, "There is not a single master gene that makes people gay...I don't think we will ever be able to predict who will be Gay."
Simon LeVay, another researcher conducted extensive studies in the differences of the brains of homosexual and heterosexual men. He admitted he found no evidence at all of a genetic cause of homosexuality in men. He said that although you cannot as yet rule out genetics, he didn't find a smidgeon of evidence that is compelling.
At least some researchers have not been intimidated by the Gay lobby into either fabricating results, or suppressing them.
A SURPRISING ALLY
Camille Paglia, a noted Lesbian author and Gay rights activist has
come out on the side of those of us with some common sense. She has stated emphatically, "Homosexuality is not 'normal'...Nature exists whether academics like it or not. And in nature, procreation is the single relentless rule. That is the norm. Our sexual bodies were designed for reproduction...No one is born Gay. The idea is ridiculous...homosexuality is an adaptation, not an inborn trait."
Any sensible, reasonable person can see this. The whole reason for sex is to perpetuate the species. Nature designed sex to be pleasurable, to induce animals to do it. Since animals are unaware that sex is necessary to reproduce, why would they engage in it unless it were pleasurable. Even among humans, if it were not pleasurable, the human race would probably have died out a long time ago. Therefore, nature never planned on homosexuality. It is a mistake, a flaw in its design.
CAN HOMOSEXUALS BE 'CURED'?
The APA's answer to that question of course would be no. They do not consider it to be an illness of any kind. After all, someone cannot be cured of an illness that doesn't exist. Sounds reasonable, doesn't it? Well, it would be, if it were true.
The National Association For Research And Therapy Of Homosexuality (NARTH) vehemently disagrees with the APA. They agree with Camille Paglia's assessment that it is an adaptive behaviour, and any behaviour of this type can be altered if the patient wants to badly enough. The problem is, most either enjoy their deviant lifestyles and don't want to change.
One of the men behind the APA's decision to remove homosexuality from the DSM was Dr. Robert Spitzer. He now works for NARTH and has completely changed his mind on the issue. He is now convinced he was wrong and that homosexual behaviour can be changed through therapy.
Spitzer has reported that after interviewing 100 homosexuals and 100 lesbians, each stated that after five years of therapy, they had moved partially or in some cases completely from Gay to Straight behaviour. The problem with this approach is that it is long, intense, and costly. It can be very hard on the patient, and many people would feel it is easier to live with the condition. Also, a great number of people would find the therapy cost-prohibitive.
LEGAL RAMIFICATIONS
For some time now, activists have used this 'born Gay' nonsense to their advantage. They have gotten the government to enact laws giving them special considerations, and any crimes committed against them labelled as 'hate crimes'. Do these tactics remind you of another group of people? It should. Both groups operate in very similar ways and for good reason. There will be more on that later.
Using their fraudulent claims, activists have even managed to get homosexual recruitment programs in the public schools in an effort to indoctrinate our children in to this degrading, unnatural lifestyle. This is done under the pretense of providing 'a safe environment' for Gay teenagers, and 'education' for the students, and 'sensitivity' training for teachers.
More recently, activists have been pushing for similar treatment for so-called 'transgender' individuals to protect them from societal disapproval. They are using the same tactics for them. Statistically, eight out of ten trangender people are male-to-female. They are claiming that although these individuals were born with the bodies of males, they were also born with the emotions, though processes, and behaviour patterns as females, so they should be treated as women, right down to allowing them to use public women's restrooms, as many of them feel 'uncomfortable' going in the presence of men. It doesn't seem to bother them that many women feel uncomfortable going in the presence of men – even if they do think and feel as females.
IF IT'S NOT GENETIC, AND NOT A CONSCIOUS CHOICE, THEN WHAT COULD BE THE CAUSE?
One of the current terms used is one I really like: Gender Confusion. Many homosexuals are out and out perverts. But many are simply confused about their feelings and desires. They are told that homosexuality is not an illness yet they know something isn't right about it. Many would like help, but don't have any idea what to do. Most psychiatrists won't see them, because as far as they are concerned, there is nothing wrong with these people. Many churches tell them that they are sinners and must resist these urges. Easier said than done. If you wish to quit smoking, there are many products to help you. If you want to quit alcohol or drugs there's AA and NA. Overweight individuals have Overeaters Anonymous. Maybe someone could form a 'Homosexuals Anonymous" group, so that those who want to change have someplace to turn to.
Doctor George Rekers, an expert on gender confusion disorders states, "Gender nonconformity in childhood may be the single common observable factor associated with homosexuality. Some of the typical childhood factors leading to homosexuality are: Feeling of being different from other children; perception of father as being distant, uninvolved and unapproving; perception of mother being too close, too involved; diminished or distorted masculinity or femininity; premature introduction to sexuality; and gender confusion.
Other noted researchers claim that boys who are overly attached to their mothers run a high risk of becoming homosexuals. Also, children who are sexually molested at a young age as seven times as likely as boys who were not molested to become Gay. These studies can be found on the NARTH website.
NOW THAT HOMOSEXUALITY IS PROTECTED BY LAW, WHICH DEVIANT BEHAVIOUR IS NEXT?
There are literally dozens of different kinds of deviant sexual behaviours such as bestiality, sado-masochism, pedophilia, and necrophilia to name just a few. These could all be considered a type of sexual orientation. At the APA convention in 2003, two psychiatrists presented a paper which actually argued that these behaviours – including pedophilia should be removed from the DSM. The names of these two miserable excuses for scientists are Charles Moser and Peggy Kleinplatz. Is anyone surprised at the fact that both of them are Jewish? We, as National Socialists are well aware of Jewish efforts to undermine and destroy Western Culture. If were up to them, not even our children would be safe from sexual predators.
In addition, homosexual lobby groups have even fueled efforts to normalise adult/child sex by lowering the age of legal consent. This would effectively legalise the actions of child predators. If this ever happened, then the Jews, who are known practitioners of child sex themselves, would truly have won a major victory against the Aryan people, and we would literally be one step away from utter destruction. This is something we dare not risk. Homosexuality must be eliminated from our society at all costs.
In 1979, homosexual rights groups lobbied for a congressional bill that stated, in part that in any legislation involving Gay rights, term sexual orientation was to be used, rather than sexual preference. This has given these groups enormous political power. We all have choices. If a criminal carjacks you at gun point and orders you to run down a helpless child or else he'll blow your brains out, you can choose to comply with his demands, or refuse and allow him to kill you. It's the same with sexual preference. You can choose to act on your deviant urges, or suppress them and behave as a heterosexual for the good of society. But claiming homosexuality is inborn or genetic, you can't help yourself, so you're off the hook, so to speak when it comes to choices. Barring illness or accident, we're all going to die of old age, and there is no choice. They claim it is the same with being Gay.
The Gay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender Commission states on its website: "Homosexuality is not a choice, any more than being left-handed or having blues or being heterosexual is a choice. It's an orientation, part of who you are. The choice is in deciding how to live your life."
GAY ALLIES
As was previously stated, the American Psychological Association has confirmed this "born Gay" nonsense. Joining them in the spread of this rubbish is the National Education Association. They sent out a pamphlet to every school superintendent in the country. It was entitled, "Just The Facts", despite that fact that it consisted of nothing but lies, half-truths ans speculations, such as "Sexual orientation is one component of a person's identity, which is made up of other components, such as culture, ethnicity, gender, and personality traits."
This is utter nonsense. There are homosexuals all over the world, composed of every ethnicity, culture, and gender. To say these factors have anything to do with whether a person is more or less likely to be Gay is ridiculous. Of course, anyone who tries to refute these views is immediately accused of suffering from a non-existent mental condition called "homophobia". This is the same tactic as used by the Jews. Anyone who speaks out against the Jews is labelled and Anti-Semite. Anyone who speaks out against Gays is automatically a homophobic. This has the effect of making the general population afraid to speak up out of fear of these rather negative sounding labels. It's been working rather well for the past few decades.
GAY OPPOSITION
In recent years, more and more psychological researchers are beginning to admit that they can find no evidence of the so-called "Gay Gene". The National Association For Research And Therapy Of Homosexuality has published these admissions which state there is absolutely no basis for the belief that people are born Gay or Straight.
One the authors of this report, researcher Dr. Dean Hamer stated, "There is not a single master gene that makes people gay...I don't think we will ever be able to predict who will be Gay."
Simon LeVay, another researcher conducted extensive studies in the differences of the brains of homosexual and heterosexual men. He admitted he found no evidence at all of a genetic cause of homosexuality in men. He said that although you cannot as yet rule out genetics, he didn't find a smidgeon of evidence that is compelling.
At least some researchers have not been intimidated by the Gay lobby into either fabricating results, or suppressing them.
A SURPRISING ALLY
Camille Paglia, a noted Lesbian author and Gay rights activist has
come out on the side of those of us with some common sense. She has stated emphatically, "Homosexuality is not 'normal'...Nature exists whether academics like it or not. And in nature, procreation is the single relentless rule. That is the norm. Our sexual bodies were designed for reproduction...No one is born Gay. The idea is ridiculous...homosexuality is an adaptation, not an inborn trait."
Any sensible, reasonable person can see this. The whole reason for sex is to perpetuate the species. Nature designed sex to be pleasurable, to induce animals to do it. Since animals are unaware that sex is necessary to reproduce, why would they engage in it unless it were pleasurable. Even among humans, if it were not pleasurable, the human race would probably have died out a long time ago. Therefore, nature never planned on homosexuality. It is a mistake, a flaw in its design.
CAN HOMOSEXUALS BE 'CURED'?
The APA's answer to that question of course would be no. They do not consider it to be an illness of any kind. After all, someone cannot be cured of an illness that doesn't exist. Sounds reasonable, doesn't it? Well, it would be, if it were true.
The National Association For Research And Therapy Of Homosexuality (NARTH) vehemently disagrees with the APA. They agree with Camille Paglia's assessment that it is an adaptive behaviour, and any behaviour of this type can be altered if the patient wants to badly enough. The problem is, most either enjoy their deviant lifestyles and don't want to change.
One of the men behind the APA's decision to remove homosexuality from the DSM was Dr. Robert Spitzer. He now works for NARTH and has completely changed his mind on the issue. He is now convinced he was wrong and that homosexual behaviour can be changed through therapy.
Spitzer has reported that after interviewing 100 homosexuals and 100 lesbians, each stated that after five years of therapy, they had moved partially or in some cases completely from Gay to Straight behaviour. The problem with this approach is that it is long, intense, and costly. It can be very hard on the patient, and many people would feel it is easier to live with the condition. Also, a great number of people would find the therapy cost-prohibitive.
LEGAL RAMIFICATIONS
For some time now, activists have used this 'born Gay' nonsense to their advantage. They have gotten the government to enact laws giving them special considerations, and any crimes committed against them labelled as 'hate crimes'. Do these tactics remind you of another group of people? It should. Both groups operate in very similar ways and for good reason. There will be more on that later.
Using their fraudulent claims, activists have even managed to get homosexual recruitment programs in the public schools in an effort to indoctrinate our children in to this degrading, unnatural lifestyle. This is done under the pretense of providing 'a safe environment' for Gay teenagers, and 'education' for the students, and 'sensitivity' training for teachers.
More recently, activists have been pushing for similar treatment for so-called 'transgender' individuals to protect them from societal disapproval. They are using the same tactics for them. Statistically, eight out of ten trangender people are male-to-female. They are claiming that although these individuals were born with the bodies of males, they were also born with the emotions, though processes, and behaviour patterns as females, so they should be treated as women, right down to allowing them to use public women's restrooms, as many of them feel 'uncomfortable' going in the presence of men. It doesn't seem to bother them that many women feel uncomfortable going in the presence of men – even if they do think and feel as females.
IF IT'S NOT GENETIC, AND NOT A CONSCIOUS CHOICE, THEN WHAT COULD BE THE CAUSE?
One of the current terms used is one I really like: Gender Confusion. Many homosexuals are out and out perverts. But many are simply confused about their feelings and desires. They are told that homosexuality is not an illness yet they know something isn't right about it. Many would like help, but don't have any idea what to do. Most psychiatrists won't see them, because as far as they are concerned, there is nothing wrong with these people. Many churches tell them that they are sinners and must resist these urges. Easier said than done. If you wish to quit smoking, there are many products to help you. If you want to quit alcohol or drugs there's AA and NA. Overweight individuals have Overeaters Anonymous. Maybe someone could form a 'Homosexuals Anonymous" group, so that those who want to change have someplace to turn to.
Doctor George Rekers, an expert on gender confusion disorders states, "Gender nonconformity in childhood may be the single common observable factor associated with homosexuality. Some of the typical childhood factors leading to homosexuality are: Feeling of being different from other children; perception of father as being distant, uninvolved and unapproving; perception of mother being too close, too involved; diminished or distorted masculinity or femininity; premature introduction to sexuality; and gender confusion.
Other noted researchers claim that boys who are overly attached to their mothers run a high risk of becoming homosexuals. Also, children who are sexually molested at a young age as seven times as likely as boys who were not molested to become Gay. These studies can be found on the NARTH website.
NOW THAT HOMOSEXUALITY IS PROTECTED BY LAW, WHICH DEVIANT BEHAVIOUR IS NEXT?
There are literally dozens of different kinds of deviant sexual behaviours such as bestiality, sado-masochism, pedophilia, and necrophilia to name just a few. These could all be considered a type of sexual orientation. At the APA convention in 2003, two psychiatrists presented a paper which actually argued that these behaviours – including pedophilia should be removed from the DSM. The names of these two miserable excuses for scientists are Charles Moser and Peggy Kleinplatz. Is anyone surprised at the fact that both of them are Jewish? We, as National Socialists are well aware of Jewish efforts to undermine and destroy Western Culture. If were up to them, not even our children would be safe from sexual predators.
In addition, homosexual lobby groups have even fueled efforts to normalise adult/child sex by lowering the age of legal consent. This would effectively legalise the actions of child predators. If this ever happened, then the Jews, who are known practitioners of child sex themselves, would truly have won a major victory against the Aryan people, and we would literally be one step away from utter destruction. This is something we dare not risk. Homosexuality must be eliminated from our society at all costs.
BORN TO BE GAY?
Interestingly enough, at the beginning of the Gay Rights movement the term "sexual preference" was used frequently. For the past few decades however, this has been changed to "sexual orientation." This was done because the former implied a choice in the matter of sexual behaviours, while the latter implied that these urges are inborn or genetic and cannot be changed.
In 1979, homosexual rights groups lobbied for a congressional bill that stated, in part that in any legislation involving Gay rights, term sexual orientation was to be used, rather than sexual preference. This has given these groups enormous political power. We all have choices. If a criminal carjacks you at gun point and orders you to run down a helpless child or else he'll blow your brains out, you can choose to comply with his demands, or refuse and allow him to kill you. It's the same with sexual preference. You can choose to act on your deviant urges, or suppress them and behave as a heterosexual for the good of society. But claiming homosexuality is inborn or genetic, you can't help yourself, so you're off the hook, so to speak when it comes to choices. Barring illness or accident, we're all going to die of old age, and there is no choice. They claim it is the same with being Gay.
The Gay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender Commission states on its website: "Homosexuality is not a choice, any more than being left-handed or having blues or being heterosexual is a choice. It's an orientation, part of who you are. The choice is in deciding how to live your life."
GAY ALLIES
As was previously stated, the American Psychological Association has confirmed this "born Gay" nonsense. Joining them in the spread of this rubbish is the National Education Association. They sent out a pamphlet to every school superintendent in the country. It was entitled, "Just The Facts", despite that fact that it consisted of nothing but lies, half-truths ans speculations, such as "Sexual orientation is one component of a person's identity, which is made up of other components, such as culture, ethnicity, gender, and personality traits."
This is utter nonsense. There are homosexuals all over the world, composed of every ethnicity, culture, and gender. To say these factors have anything to do with whether a person is more or less likely to be Gay is ridiculous. Of course, anyone who tries to refute these views is immediately accused of suffering from a non-existent mental condition called "homophobia". This is the same tactic as used by the Jews. Anyone who speaks out against the Jews is labelled and Anti-Semite. Anyone who speaks out against Gays is automatically a homophobic. This has the effect of making the general population afraid to speak up out of fear of these rather negative sounding labels. It's been working rather well for the past few decades.
GAY OPPOSITION
In recent years, more and more psychological researchers are beginning to admit that they can find no evidence of the so-called "Gay Gene". The National Association For Research And Therapy Of Homosexuality has published these admissions which state there is absolutely no basis for the belief that people are born Gay or Straight.
One the authors of this report, researcher Dr. Dean Hamer stated, "There is not a single master gene that makes people gay...I don't think we will ever be able to predict who will be Gay."
Simon LeVay, another researcher conducted extensive studies in the differences of the brains of homosexual and heterosexual men. He admitted he found no evidence at all of a genetic cause of homosexuality in men. He said that although you cannot as yet rule out genetics, he didn't find a smidgeon of evidence that is compelling.
At least some researchers have not been intimidated by the Gay lobby into either fabricating results, or suppressing them.
A SURPRISING ALLY
Camille Paglia, a noted Lesbian author and Gay rights activist has
come out on the side of those of us with some common sense. She has stated emphatically, "Homosexuality is not 'normal'...Nature exists whether academics like it or not. And in nature, procreation is the single relentless rule. That is the norm. Our sexual bodies were designed for reproduction...No one is born Gay. The idea is ridiculous...homosexuality is an adaptation, not an inborn trait."
Any sensible, reasonable person can see this. The whole reason for sex is to perpetuate the species. Nature designed sex to be pleasurable, to induce animals to do it. Since animals are unaware that sex is necessary to reproduce, why would they engage in it unless it were pleasurable. Even among humans, if it were not pleasurable, the human race would probably have died out a long time ago. Therefore, nature never planned on homosexuality. It is a mistake, a flaw in its design.
CAN HOMOSEXUALS BE 'CURED'?
The APA's answer to that question of course would be no. They do not consider it to be an illness of any kind. After all, someone cannot be cured of an illness that doesn't exist. Sounds reasonable, doesn't it? Well, it would be, if it were true.
The National Association For Research And Therapy Of Homosexuality (NARTH) vehemently disagrees with the APA. They agree with Camille Paglia's assessment that it is an adaptive behaviour, and any behaviour of this type can be altered if the patient wants to badly enough. The problem is, most either enjoy their deviant lifestyles and don't want to change.
One of the men behind the APA's decision to remove homosexuality from the DSM was Dr. Robert Spitzer. He now works for NARTH and has completely changed his mind on the issue. He is now convinced he was wrong and that homosexual behaviour can be changed through therapy.
Spitzer has reported that after interviewing 100 homosexuals and 100 lesbians, each stated that after five years of therapy, they had moved partially or in some cases completely from Gay to Straight behaviour. The problem with this approach is that it is long, intense, and costly. It can be very hard on the patient, and many people would feel it is easier to live with the condition. Also, a great number of people would find the therapy cost-prohibitive.
LEGAL RAMIFICATIONS
For some time now, activists have used this 'born Gay' nonsense to their advantage. They have gotten the government to enact laws giving them special considerations, and any crimes committed against them labelled as 'hate crimes'. Do these tactics remind you of another group of people? It should. Both groups operate in very similar ways and for good reason. There will be more on that later.
Using their fraudulent claims, activists have even managed to get homosexual recruitment programs in the public schools in an effort to indoctrinate our children in to this degrading, unnatural lifestyle. This is done under the pretense of providing 'a safe environment' for Gay teenagers, and 'education' for the students, and 'sensitivity' training for teachers.
More recently, activists have been pushing for similar treatment for so-called 'transgender' individuals to protect them from societal disapproval. They are using the same tactics for them. Statistically, eight out of ten trangender people are male-to-female. They are claiming that although these individuals were born with the bodies of males, they were also born with the emotions, though processes, and behaviour patterns as females, so they should be treated as women, right down to allowing them to use public women's restrooms, as many of them feel 'uncomfortable' going in the presence of men. It doesn't seem to bother them that many women feel uncomfortable going in the presence of men – even if they do think and feel as females.
IF IT'S NOT GENETIC, AND NOT A CONSCIOUS CHOICE, THEN WHAT COULD BE THE CAUSE?
One of the current terms used is one I really like: Gender Confusion. Many homosexuals are out and out perverts. But many are simply confused about their feelings and desires. They are told that homosexuality is not an illness yet they know something isn't right about it. Many would like help, but don't have any idea what to do. Most psychiatrists won't see them, because as far as they are concerned, there is nothing wrong with these people. Many churches tell them that they are sinners and must resist these urges. Easier said than done. If you wish to quit smoking, there are many products to help you. If you want to quit alcohol or drugs there's AA and NA. Overweight individuals have Overeaters Anonymous. Maybe someone could form a 'Homosexuals Anonymous" group, so that those who want to change have someplace to turn to.
Doctor George Rekers, an expert on gender confusion disorders states, "Gender nonconformity in childhood may be the single common observable factor associated with homosexuality. Some of the typical childhood factors leading to homosexuality are: Feeling of being different from other children; perception of father as being distant, uninvolved and unapproving; perception of mother being too close, too involved; diminished or distorted masculinity or femininity; premature introduction to sexuality; and gender confusion.
Other noted researchers claim that boys who are overly attached to their mothers run a high risk of becoming homosexuals. Also, children who are sexually molested at a young age as seven times as likely as boys who were not molested to become Gay. These studies can be found on the NARTH website.
NOW THAT HOMOSEXUALITY IS PROTECTED BY LAW, WHICH DEVIANT BEHAVIOUR IS NEXT?
There are literally dozens of different kinds of deviant sexual behaviours such as bestiality, sado-masochism, pedophilia, and necrophilia to name just a few. These could all be considered a type of sexual orientation. At the APA convention in 2003, two psychiatrists presented a paper which actually argued that these behaviours – including pedophilia should be removed from the DSM. The names of these two miserable excuses for scientists are Charles Moser and Peggy Kleinplatz. Is anyone surprised at the fact that both of them are Jewish? We, as National Socialists are well aware of Jewish efforts to undermine and destroy Western Culture. If were up to them, not even our children would be safe from sexual predators.
In addition, homosexual lobby groups have even fueled efforts to normalise adult/child sex by lowering the age of legal consent. This would effectively legalise the actions of child predators. If this ever happened, then the Jews, who are known practitioners of child sex themselves, would truly have won a major victory against the Aryan people, and we would literally be one step away from utter destruction. This is something we dare not risk. Homosexuality must be eliminated from our society at all costs.
In 1979, homosexual rights groups lobbied for a congressional bill that stated, in part that in any legislation involving Gay rights, term sexual orientation was to be used, rather than sexual preference. This has given these groups enormous political power. We all have choices. If a criminal carjacks you at gun point and orders you to run down a helpless child or else he'll blow your brains out, you can choose to comply with his demands, or refuse and allow him to kill you. It's the same with sexual preference. You can choose to act on your deviant urges, or suppress them and behave as a heterosexual for the good of society. But claiming homosexuality is inborn or genetic, you can't help yourself, so you're off the hook, so to speak when it comes to choices. Barring illness or accident, we're all going to die of old age, and there is no choice. They claim it is the same with being Gay.
The Gay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender Commission states on its website: "Homosexuality is not a choice, any more than being left-handed or having blues or being heterosexual is a choice. It's an orientation, part of who you are. The choice is in deciding how to live your life."
GAY ALLIES
As was previously stated, the American Psychological Association has confirmed this "born Gay" nonsense. Joining them in the spread of this rubbish is the National Education Association. They sent out a pamphlet to every school superintendent in the country. It was entitled, "Just The Facts", despite that fact that it consisted of nothing but lies, half-truths ans speculations, such as "Sexual orientation is one component of a person's identity, which is made up of other components, such as culture, ethnicity, gender, and personality traits."
This is utter nonsense. There are homosexuals all over the world, composed of every ethnicity, culture, and gender. To say these factors have anything to do with whether a person is more or less likely to be Gay is ridiculous. Of course, anyone who tries to refute these views is immediately accused of suffering from a non-existent mental condition called "homophobia". This is the same tactic as used by the Jews. Anyone who speaks out against the Jews is labelled and Anti-Semite. Anyone who speaks out against Gays is automatically a homophobic. This has the effect of making the general population afraid to speak up out of fear of these rather negative sounding labels. It's been working rather well for the past few decades.
GAY OPPOSITION
In recent years, more and more psychological researchers are beginning to admit that they can find no evidence of the so-called "Gay Gene". The National Association For Research And Therapy Of Homosexuality has published these admissions which state there is absolutely no basis for the belief that people are born Gay or Straight.
One the authors of this report, researcher Dr. Dean Hamer stated, "There is not a single master gene that makes people gay...I don't think we will ever be able to predict who will be Gay."
Simon LeVay, another researcher conducted extensive studies in the differences of the brains of homosexual and heterosexual men. He admitted he found no evidence at all of a genetic cause of homosexuality in men. He said that although you cannot as yet rule out genetics, he didn't find a smidgeon of evidence that is compelling.
At least some researchers have not been intimidated by the Gay lobby into either fabricating results, or suppressing them.
A SURPRISING ALLY
Camille Paglia, a noted Lesbian author and Gay rights activist has
come out on the side of those of us with some common sense. She has stated emphatically, "Homosexuality is not 'normal'...Nature exists whether academics like it or not. And in nature, procreation is the single relentless rule. That is the norm. Our sexual bodies were designed for reproduction...No one is born Gay. The idea is ridiculous...homosexuality is an adaptation, not an inborn trait."
Any sensible, reasonable person can see this. The whole reason for sex is to perpetuate the species. Nature designed sex to be pleasurable, to induce animals to do it. Since animals are unaware that sex is necessary to reproduce, why would they engage in it unless it were pleasurable. Even among humans, if it were not pleasurable, the human race would probably have died out a long time ago. Therefore, nature never planned on homosexuality. It is a mistake, a flaw in its design.
CAN HOMOSEXUALS BE 'CURED'?
The APA's answer to that question of course would be no. They do not consider it to be an illness of any kind. After all, someone cannot be cured of an illness that doesn't exist. Sounds reasonable, doesn't it? Well, it would be, if it were true.
The National Association For Research And Therapy Of Homosexuality (NARTH) vehemently disagrees with the APA. They agree with Camille Paglia's assessment that it is an adaptive behaviour, and any behaviour of this type can be altered if the patient wants to badly enough. The problem is, most either enjoy their deviant lifestyles and don't want to change.
One of the men behind the APA's decision to remove homosexuality from the DSM was Dr. Robert Spitzer. He now works for NARTH and has completely changed his mind on the issue. He is now convinced he was wrong and that homosexual behaviour can be changed through therapy.
Spitzer has reported that after interviewing 100 homosexuals and 100 lesbians, each stated that after five years of therapy, they had moved partially or in some cases completely from Gay to Straight behaviour. The problem with this approach is that it is long, intense, and costly. It can be very hard on the patient, and many people would feel it is easier to live with the condition. Also, a great number of people would find the therapy cost-prohibitive.
LEGAL RAMIFICATIONS
For some time now, activists have used this 'born Gay' nonsense to their advantage. They have gotten the government to enact laws giving them special considerations, and any crimes committed against them labelled as 'hate crimes'. Do these tactics remind you of another group of people? It should. Both groups operate in very similar ways and for good reason. There will be more on that later.
Using their fraudulent claims, activists have even managed to get homosexual recruitment programs in the public schools in an effort to indoctrinate our children in to this degrading, unnatural lifestyle. This is done under the pretense of providing 'a safe environment' for Gay teenagers, and 'education' for the students, and 'sensitivity' training for teachers.
More recently, activists have been pushing for similar treatment for so-called 'transgender' individuals to protect them from societal disapproval. They are using the same tactics for them. Statistically, eight out of ten trangender people are male-to-female. They are claiming that although these individuals were born with the bodies of males, they were also born with the emotions, though processes, and behaviour patterns as females, so they should be treated as women, right down to allowing them to use public women's restrooms, as many of them feel 'uncomfortable' going in the presence of men. It doesn't seem to bother them that many women feel uncomfortable going in the presence of men – even if they do think and feel as females.
IF IT'S NOT GENETIC, AND NOT A CONSCIOUS CHOICE, THEN WHAT COULD BE THE CAUSE?
One of the current terms used is one I really like: Gender Confusion. Many homosexuals are out and out perverts. But many are simply confused about their feelings and desires. They are told that homosexuality is not an illness yet they know something isn't right about it. Many would like help, but don't have any idea what to do. Most psychiatrists won't see them, because as far as they are concerned, there is nothing wrong with these people. Many churches tell them that they are sinners and must resist these urges. Easier said than done. If you wish to quit smoking, there are many products to help you. If you want to quit alcohol or drugs there's AA and NA. Overweight individuals have Overeaters Anonymous. Maybe someone could form a 'Homosexuals Anonymous" group, so that those who want to change have someplace to turn to.
Doctor George Rekers, an expert on gender confusion disorders states, "Gender nonconformity in childhood may be the single common observable factor associated with homosexuality. Some of the typical childhood factors leading to homosexuality are: Feeling of being different from other children; perception of father as being distant, uninvolved and unapproving; perception of mother being too close, too involved; diminished or distorted masculinity or femininity; premature introduction to sexuality; and gender confusion.
Other noted researchers claim that boys who are overly attached to their mothers run a high risk of becoming homosexuals. Also, children who are sexually molested at a young age as seven times as likely as boys who were not molested to become Gay. These studies can be found on the NARTH website.
NOW THAT HOMOSEXUALITY IS PROTECTED BY LAW, WHICH DEVIANT BEHAVIOUR IS NEXT?
There are literally dozens of different kinds of deviant sexual behaviours such as bestiality, sado-masochism, pedophilia, and necrophilia to name just a few. These could all be considered a type of sexual orientation. At the APA convention in 2003, two psychiatrists presented a paper which actually argued that these behaviours – including pedophilia should be removed from the DSM. The names of these two miserable excuses for scientists are Charles Moser and Peggy Kleinplatz. Is anyone surprised at the fact that both of them are Jewish? We, as National Socialists are well aware of Jewish efforts to undermine and destroy Western Culture. If were up to them, not even our children would be safe from sexual predators.
In addition, homosexual lobby groups have even fueled efforts to normalise adult/child sex by lowering the age of legal consent. This would effectively legalise the actions of child predators. If this ever happened, then the Jews, who are known practitioners of child sex themselves, would truly have won a major victory against the Aryan people, and we would literally be one step away from utter destruction. This is something we dare not risk. Homosexuality must be eliminated from our society at all costs.
Friday, July 16, 2010
HOMOSEXUALITY AS A PSYCHIATRIC DISORDER
The American Psychiatric Association (APA) is responsible for the publication of the "Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders" (DSM). This is updated every few years as new studies are made, and as new theories are put forth. On the whole, this book is an extremely valuable tool for the mental healthcare profession. For
example, in DSM-I, those who suffered from manic-depressive disorder, also known as bi-polar disorder were usually institutionalised. However, it is known today that with the proper medication, people with bi-polar disorder can control their condition and lead normal, productive lives. DSM-VI does NOT recommend institutionalisation unless the patient has demonstrated that they are a danger to themselves or others.
In 1973, the APA removed homosexuality from DSM-II. They claim to have based there decision on new scientific evidence that proves homosexual behaviour is normal and should be accepted in our society. This decision was hailed as a victory by Gay Rights Activists, who continually point to this decision as one of the reasons why their lifestyle should be affirmed. The Catholic Church issued a formal statement condemning this decision as being detrimental to the health and well-being of a decent, Christian society.
The removal of homosexuality from the DSM has given Gay Rights Activists the credibility they need to demand that their unnatural lifestyles should be tolerated, even though there is no hard evidence to suggest that there is an truth to these assertions at all. It is just more liberal lies and half-truths used to infiltrate a destructive influence into every aspect of Western culture. These are nothing but false premises, and must be dragged into the open and exposed to the light of truth.
HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN?
The APA's Diagnostic And Statistical Manual is written and revised by Psychiatrists and Psychologists who work for the organisation. For those of you who are uncertain of the difference, a psychologist holds a PhD in psychology. A psychiatrist holds both a PhD and an MD. Therefore a psychiatrist may prescibe medications to patients, while a psychologist cannot.
Since the APA writes its own rules and regulations, they usually reflect the personal and political views of its authors. Outside forces also play a significant role. Organisations such as the APA have known to be influenced by political groups such as the Gay Liberation Front and B'nai Brith's infamous Anti-Defamation League, not to mention the American Civil Liberties Union.
In 1981, Dr. Ronald Bayer, a pro-homosexual psychiatrist stated that the first attack on the APA by Gay Rights activists occurred in 1970 when the organisation held its National Convention in San Francisco. Under the circumstances, this was an unfortunate choice of locations. These activists decided to disrupt the proceedings by constantly interrupting speakers, and shouting down and ridiculing any psychiatrist who viewed homosexuality as a mental disorder.
The following year in 1971, a Gay activist named Frank Kameny worked with the Gay Liberation Front to demonstrate against the convention. At the conference, Kameny commandeered a microphone and shouted, "Psychiatry is the enemy incarnate! Psychiatry has waged a relentless war of extermination against us. You may take this as a declaration of war against you!"
Activists forged APA credentials to gain access to the members only areas of the conference. They threatened anyone who claimed that homosexuality was a sickness that needed to be cured. No one, however was actually attacked.
Kameny managed to find an ally inside of the APA. This was Dr. Kent Robinson who helped the activist present his demand that homosexuality be removed from the DSM. At the 1972 convention, as incredible as it sounds, Gay activists were permitted to set up a display booth with a sign that read, "Gay, Proud, and Healthy". They may have been Gay and proud, but as we all know, they were far from
being healthy.
Kameny, who was not a psychiatrist or psychologist or even a member of the APA, was then permitted to be a part of the panel of experts who were to discuss the issue of homosexuality. It was at this convention that the decision to remove homosexuality as a mental disorder from the next edition of the Diagnostic And Statistical Manual For Mental Disorders was made. It had absolutely NOTHING to do with scientific discoveries, but was the direct result of politics, threats, and intimidation.
THE OPPOSITION
Prior to the APA's 1973 convention, an attempt was made by several psychiatrists to organise an opposition to the decision to remove homosexuality from the DSM. By the way, in DSM-II, homosexuality was, appropriately enough, the first abnormal behaviour listed under section "302. Sexual Deviations." Dr. Irving Bieber, who was surprisingly a noted Jewish psychiatrist led the effort to oppose the decision, along with Dr. Charles Socarides and formed the Ad Hoc Committee Against The Deletion Of Homosexuality From DSM-II. Their concerns fell largely on deaf ears. The majority of the APA had become so intimidated by the activists, that all that was needed was a final confirmation by the APA's Board Of Trustees.
THE AXE FALLS
After nearly three years of political pressure, threats and intimidation, in 1973, a committee of highly placed members of the APA met behind closed doors and voted for removal. Opponents were given only 15 minutes to protest this decision, according to Dr. Jeffrey Satinover. Whenever a major decision such as this is made, opponents are given this opportunity to speak, not that opponents have much of a chance with only 15 minutes. Rather than changing the committee's minds, it was instead decided that the issue would be voted on by the entire APA membership. Another Gay rights organisation called "The National Gay Task Force" purchased the APA's mailing list and sent out letters to every APA member urging them to vote to remove homosexuality as a disorder from the DSM. No APA member was informed that this was funded by a Gay Rights group.
While Dr. Satinover was attending a conference in England in 1994, he related a story of a man he met there who told him that he had been in the Gay lifestyle for many years, but then had left. He recounted that he and his "partner", after the 1973 decision, along with a very highly placed member of the APA's Board Of Trustees were celebrating their victory. It seems that Gay Rights activists had managed to place in high positions within the APA itself, people who had maneuvered things to ensure victory. This highly placed member was presented to both the membership and the general public as a disinterested party who was searching solely for the truth to whether homosexuality was a mental disorder or not. Now that's a good one! They actually had their own people on the inside to make certain that the vote went their way irregardless of the actual truth! It was also revealed that some of these people were Jews, which is no surprise, as it is a well known fact that Jews dominate the mental health profession, amongst other things.
THE OPPOSITION SPEAKS OUT
Several prominent psychiatrists spoke out on how Gay Rights activists really accomplished this. Dr. Charles Socarides publicly stated, "This was done without any valid scientific evidence to prove that homosexuality is not a behaviour disorder. To declare a condition a 'non-condition', a group of practitioners had removed it from our list of serious psychosexual disorders. The action was all the more remarkable when one considers that it involved an out-of-hand and peremptory disregard and dismissal not only of hundreds of psychiatric and psychoanalytic research papers and reports, but also a number of other serious studies by groups of psychiatrists, psychologists, and educators over the past seventy years..."
"For the next 18 years, the APA decision served as a Trojan Horse,
opening the gates to widespread psychological and social change in sexual customs and mores. The decision was to be used on numerous occasions for numerous purposes with the goal of normalising homosexuality and elevating it to an esteemed status.
"To some American psychiatrists, this action remains a chilling reminder that if scientific principles are not fought for, they can be lost – a disillusioning warning that unless we make no exceptions to science, we are subject to the snares of political factionalism and the propagation of untruths to an unsuspecting and uninformed public, to the rest of the medical profession, and to the behavioural sciences."
THE RESULTS OF THIS DECISION
By the rationale of the Gay activists, if a disease or a disorder is offensive to those who have it, it should no longer be considered a disease or a disorder. Since many people who have say, Turret's Syndrome, which is characterised by uncontrolled ticks and vocalisations, do indeed feel ostracised from 'normal' people, perhaps the medical profession should remove it from their list of diseases and disorders. If that happened, then they would no longer be ill, because doctors say it is no longer an illness, so that would make them as normal as you or me. We could do this for any affliction which offends its victims. Hey, using this method, we could eliminate all illness from the world simply by declaring the various illnesses as no longer being illnesses. That's brilliant, isn't it?! No, it's absolutely ridiculous. But that's exactly what Gay Rights activists have done with homosexuality. They got it removed from the catalogue of mental disorders, so therefore, they are as normal as you and me.
What has been the result of this absurd decision? A rapid deterioration of American morals and values. At one time in this country, morality and decency were respected virtues. Now they are scorned as being "old-fashioned", or bigoted.
For those who still deny this, think back. When did our values and morals start to go down the toilet? It was the latter part of the 1960's when Gay Rights groups started to appear and make their voices heard. Once this began, the handle was pushed, and morality and decency began to go right down to the sewer.
Comrades, it's not too late. We can return to the time-honoured values this country once held sacred. To do this, the truth must be told. The Jew/Communist lies must be exposed. This is what the Aryan Nations is trying to accomplish. Don't listen to liberal lies. They have their own agenda, and it has nothing to do with decency.
example, in DSM-I, those who suffered from manic-depressive disorder, also known as bi-polar disorder were usually institutionalised. However, it is known today that with the proper medication, people with bi-polar disorder can control their condition and lead normal, productive lives. DSM-VI does NOT recommend institutionalisation unless the patient has demonstrated that they are a danger to themselves or others.
In 1973, the APA removed homosexuality from DSM-II. They claim to have based there decision on new scientific evidence that proves homosexual behaviour is normal and should be accepted in our society. This decision was hailed as a victory by Gay Rights Activists, who continually point to this decision as one of the reasons why their lifestyle should be affirmed. The Catholic Church issued a formal statement condemning this decision as being detrimental to the health and well-being of a decent, Christian society.
The removal of homosexuality from the DSM has given Gay Rights Activists the credibility they need to demand that their unnatural lifestyles should be tolerated, even though there is no hard evidence to suggest that there is an truth to these assertions at all. It is just more liberal lies and half-truths used to infiltrate a destructive influence into every aspect of Western culture. These are nothing but false premises, and must be dragged into the open and exposed to the light of truth.
HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN?
The APA's Diagnostic And Statistical Manual is written and revised by Psychiatrists and Psychologists who work for the organisation. For those of you who are uncertain of the difference, a psychologist holds a PhD in psychology. A psychiatrist holds both a PhD and an MD. Therefore a psychiatrist may prescibe medications to patients, while a psychologist cannot.
Since the APA writes its own rules and regulations, they usually reflect the personal and political views of its authors. Outside forces also play a significant role. Organisations such as the APA have known to be influenced by political groups such as the Gay Liberation Front and B'nai Brith's infamous Anti-Defamation League, not to mention the American Civil Liberties Union.
In 1981, Dr. Ronald Bayer, a pro-homosexual psychiatrist stated that the first attack on the APA by Gay Rights activists occurred in 1970 when the organisation held its National Convention in San Francisco. Under the circumstances, this was an unfortunate choice of locations. These activists decided to disrupt the proceedings by constantly interrupting speakers, and shouting down and ridiculing any psychiatrist who viewed homosexuality as a mental disorder.
The following year in 1971, a Gay activist named Frank Kameny worked with the Gay Liberation Front to demonstrate against the convention. At the conference, Kameny commandeered a microphone and shouted, "Psychiatry is the enemy incarnate! Psychiatry has waged a relentless war of extermination against us. You may take this as a declaration of war against you!"
Activists forged APA credentials to gain access to the members only areas of the conference. They threatened anyone who claimed that homosexuality was a sickness that needed to be cured. No one, however was actually attacked.
Kameny managed to find an ally inside of the APA. This was Dr. Kent Robinson who helped the activist present his demand that homosexuality be removed from the DSM. At the 1972 convention, as incredible as it sounds, Gay activists were permitted to set up a display booth with a sign that read, "Gay, Proud, and Healthy". They may have been Gay and proud, but as we all know, they were far from
being healthy.
Kameny, who was not a psychiatrist or psychologist or even a member of the APA, was then permitted to be a part of the panel of experts who were to discuss the issue of homosexuality. It was at this convention that the decision to remove homosexuality as a mental disorder from the next edition of the Diagnostic And Statistical Manual For Mental Disorders was made. It had absolutely NOTHING to do with scientific discoveries, but was the direct result of politics, threats, and intimidation.
THE OPPOSITION
Prior to the APA's 1973 convention, an attempt was made by several psychiatrists to organise an opposition to the decision to remove homosexuality from the DSM. By the way, in DSM-II, homosexuality was, appropriately enough, the first abnormal behaviour listed under section "302. Sexual Deviations." Dr. Irving Bieber, who was surprisingly a noted Jewish psychiatrist led the effort to oppose the decision, along with Dr. Charles Socarides and formed the Ad Hoc Committee Against The Deletion Of Homosexuality From DSM-II. Their concerns fell largely on deaf ears. The majority of the APA had become so intimidated by the activists, that all that was needed was a final confirmation by the APA's Board Of Trustees.
THE AXE FALLS
After nearly three years of political pressure, threats and intimidation, in 1973, a committee of highly placed members of the APA met behind closed doors and voted for removal. Opponents were given only 15 minutes to protest this decision, according to Dr. Jeffrey Satinover. Whenever a major decision such as this is made, opponents are given this opportunity to speak, not that opponents have much of a chance with only 15 minutes. Rather than changing the committee's minds, it was instead decided that the issue would be voted on by the entire APA membership. Another Gay rights organisation called "The National Gay Task Force" purchased the APA's mailing list and sent out letters to every APA member urging them to vote to remove homosexuality as a disorder from the DSM. No APA member was informed that this was funded by a Gay Rights group.
While Dr. Satinover was attending a conference in England in 1994, he related a story of a man he met there who told him that he had been in the Gay lifestyle for many years, but then had left. He recounted that he and his "partner", after the 1973 decision, along with a very highly placed member of the APA's Board Of Trustees were celebrating their victory. It seems that Gay Rights activists had managed to place in high positions within the APA itself, people who had maneuvered things to ensure victory. This highly placed member was presented to both the membership and the general public as a disinterested party who was searching solely for the truth to whether homosexuality was a mental disorder or not. Now that's a good one! They actually had their own people on the inside to make certain that the vote went their way irregardless of the actual truth! It was also revealed that some of these people were Jews, which is no surprise, as it is a well known fact that Jews dominate the mental health profession, amongst other things.
THE OPPOSITION SPEAKS OUT
Several prominent psychiatrists spoke out on how Gay Rights activists really accomplished this. Dr. Charles Socarides publicly stated, "This was done without any valid scientific evidence to prove that homosexuality is not a behaviour disorder. To declare a condition a 'non-condition', a group of practitioners had removed it from our list of serious psychosexual disorders. The action was all the more remarkable when one considers that it involved an out-of-hand and peremptory disregard and dismissal not only of hundreds of psychiatric and psychoanalytic research papers and reports, but also a number of other serious studies by groups of psychiatrists, psychologists, and educators over the past seventy years..."
"For the next 18 years, the APA decision served as a Trojan Horse,
opening the gates to widespread psychological and social change in sexual customs and mores. The decision was to be used on numerous occasions for numerous purposes with the goal of normalising homosexuality and elevating it to an esteemed status.
"To some American psychiatrists, this action remains a chilling reminder that if scientific principles are not fought for, they can be lost – a disillusioning warning that unless we make no exceptions to science, we are subject to the snares of political factionalism and the propagation of untruths to an unsuspecting and uninformed public, to the rest of the medical profession, and to the behavioural sciences."
THE RESULTS OF THIS DECISION
By the rationale of the Gay activists, if a disease or a disorder is offensive to those who have it, it should no longer be considered a disease or a disorder. Since many people who have say, Turret's Syndrome, which is characterised by uncontrolled ticks and vocalisations, do indeed feel ostracised from 'normal' people, perhaps the medical profession should remove it from their list of diseases and disorders. If that happened, then they would no longer be ill, because doctors say it is no longer an illness, so that would make them as normal as you or me. We could do this for any affliction which offends its victims. Hey, using this method, we could eliminate all illness from the world simply by declaring the various illnesses as no longer being illnesses. That's brilliant, isn't it?! No, it's absolutely ridiculous. But that's exactly what Gay Rights activists have done with homosexuality. They got it removed from the catalogue of mental disorders, so therefore, they are as normal as you and me.
What has been the result of this absurd decision? A rapid deterioration of American morals and values. At one time in this country, morality and decency were respected virtues. Now they are scorned as being "old-fashioned", or bigoted.
For those who still deny this, think back. When did our values and morals start to go down the toilet? It was the latter part of the 1960's when Gay Rights groups started to appear and make their voices heard. Once this began, the handle was pushed, and morality and decency began to go right down to the sewer.
Comrades, it's not too late. We can return to the time-honoured values this country once held sacred. To do this, the truth must be told. The Jew/Communist lies must be exposed. This is what the Aryan Nations is trying to accomplish. Don't listen to liberal lies. They have their own agenda, and it has nothing to do with decency.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)