Showing posts with label immigrants. Show all posts
Showing posts with label immigrants. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

New Study Shows That Over 80% Of New Jobs In Texas Went To Immigrants

Thursday, September 22, 2011, 11:06 AM EDT

Gov. Rick Perry

Gov. Rick Perry

Elected Officials Who...

  • Joined the Reclaim America Jobs Caucus
    Updated Friday, June 18, 2010, 10:48 AM EDT
Total 41 Members
  • (AL) Bachus
  • (AL) Griffith
  • (AZ) Franks
  • (AR) Boozman
  • (CA) Bilbray
  • (CA) Calvert
  • (CA) Gallegly
  • (CA) Rohrabacher
  • (CA) Hunter
  • (CA) Issa
  • (CA) McKeon
  • (CA) Miller
  • (CA) Royce
  • (FL) Bilirakis
  • (FL) Young
  • (GA) Gingrey
  • (GA) Kingston
  • (IN) Burton
  • (IA) King
  • (KS) Tiahrt
  • (LA) Alexander
  • (MD) Bartlett
  • (MO) Akin
  • (NC) Jones
  • (NC) McHenry
  • (NC) McIntyre
  • (NC) Myrick
  • (OH) Latta
  • (TN) Blackburn
  • (TN) Roe
  • (TX) Carter
  • (TX) Conaway
  • (TX) Gohmert
  • (TX) Marchant
  • (TX) McCaul
  • (TX) Neugebauer
  • (TX) Sessions
  • (TX) Smith
  • (UT) Bishop
  • (UT) Chaffetz
  • (WV) Capito

New research by Dr. Steve Camarota at the Center for Immigration Studies finds that 81% of the jobs created in Texas between the years 2007 and 2011 went to newly-arrived immigrants. Conclusions were based on an analysis of data from the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey.

The new research also finds that:

  • In terms of numbers, between the second quarter of 2007, right before the recession began, and the second quarter of 2011, total employment in Texas increased by 279,000. Of this, 225,000 jobs went to immigrants (legal and illegal) who arrived in the United States in 2007 or later.
  • Of newly arrived immigrants who took a job in Texas, 93 percent were not U.S. citizens. Thus government data show that more than three-fourths of net job growth in Texas were taken by newly arrived non-citizens (legal and illegal).
  • The large share of job growth that went to immigrants is surprising because the native-born accounted for 69 percent of the growth in Texas’ working-age population (16 to 65). Thus, even though natives made up most of the growth in potential workers, most of the job growth went to immigrants.
  • The share of working-age natives holding a job in Texas declined significantly, from 71 percent in 2007 to 67 percent in 2011. This decline is very similar to the decline for natives in the United States as a whole and is an indication that the situation for native-born workers in Texas is very similar to the overall situation in the country despite the state’s job growth.
  • Of newly arrived immigrants who took jobs in Texas since 2007, we estimate that 50 percent (113,000) were illegal immigrants. Thus, about 40 percent of all the job growth in Texas since 2007 went to newly arrived illegal immigrants and 40 percent went to newly arrived legal immigrants.
  • Immigrants took jobs across the educational distribution. More than one out three (97,000) of newly arrived immigrants who took a job had at least some college.
  • These numbers raise the question of whether it makes sense to continue the current high level of legal immigration and also whether to continue to tolerate illegal immigration.
The full report can be found at the Center for Immigration Studies' website.

Comment:

Comrades, what this proves is we have to stop not only illegal immigration, but ALL immigration.

Now I understand that most immigrants just want a better life, but there aren't enough jobs for those us native born people and the immigrants who are already here. That's not just good old foreigner bashing talk. It's a fact. I, and all of you were born here. Why should we have to compete with immigrants for a job? Since when are their problems our problem? Add to that the fact that they drive wages down. They come from countries where workers make less in a day that the average American makes in an hour.

Here's a hypothetical situation. There's a particular job that pays typically $20 an hour. Someone immigrates here from a poor country legally. In his country, that same job might get him $15 a day. When he applies for the job here, they offer him say $12 an hour. He thinks that's fantastic pay, and gladly accepts it, whereas an American would think that's lousy pay, and would reject it, unless he was desperate. The employer wants to pay as little as possible, and the immigrant is qualified and willing to take 40% less than an American, so he gets the job, and the American is SOL, unless he too is willing to work for 40% less. Is that fair? No, but capitalism isn't supposed to be fair. Capitalism is business is business, and dog eat dog. That's reality in this world today.

There are those who point out that National Socialism has fewer freedoms than the current system. Well, maybe a few less. But most of the freedoms we THINK we have now are an illusion. We have freedom of speech? Hah ! Don't make me laugh. Okay, I can write what I write on this blog and haven't been arrested - yet. However, if I applied for a job and the employer Googled my name to see what came up, he would find this blog. Unless he was a National Socialist, I doubt I'd get the job. I would have lost out on a job because of my speech.

Is that freedom of speech? No it isn't. There are other ways than prison to deal with the politically incorrect. The best way is economic sanctions like being frozen out of employment.
Much better than prison. This way, the politically incorrect suffer and the state doesn't have to support them in prison at about $30,000 a year. Even if they qualify for SSI or welfare, it's way less than $30,000.

There have even been cases of people being evicted from their apartments for being politically incorrect.

Okay, we can say what we please here. But there are other consequences we might have to pay than prison. True freedom of speech means we can say what we please WITHOUT consequences.

What about freedom of the press? Ninety percent of the media, both written and broadcast are controlled by Jews. Most media outlets are incorporated, and the names of the CEOs and board of directors are public information. Check who runs the networks and major papers for yourselves if you don't believe me. BTW, a non-Jewish owner of the "Hickville Gazette", circulation 329 doesn't count. I'm talking about the big ones, not little papers of some one-horse-town.

Reporters are supposed to be impartial. But let's face it. NO ONE is impartial. Everyone has some sort of agenda.

The Jewish owners print or broadcast only that which THEY consider appropriate. If something doesn't fit their agenda, it doesn't get printed or broadcast. Or if it does, it's done in such a way as to MAKE it fit the agenda.

In National Socialist Germany, the people had more rights that our opponents would like you to believe. A few things they didn't have rights to were the right to be irresponsible, and the right to be an asshole. Pardon my language. I just couldn't think of another way to say it.

National Socialism does not tolerate that kind of behaviour. At this time, our society does. Is it any wonder that things are falling apart? Eventually, that sort of thing catches up with you.

National Socialism requires everyone to behave responsibly and sensibly at all times. Those who refuse to have no place in our society. HAIL VICTORY!

Dan 88!

New Study Shows That Over 80% Of New Jobs In Texas Went To Immigrants

Thursday, September 22, 2011, 11:06 AM EDT

Gov. Rick Perry

Gov. Rick Perry

Elected Officials Who...

  • Joined the Reclaim America Jobs Caucus
    Updated Friday, June 18, 2010, 10:48 AM EDT
Total 41 Members
  • (AL) Bachus
  • (AL) Griffith
  • (AZ) Franks
  • (AR) Boozman
  • (CA) Bilbray
  • (CA) Calvert
  • (CA) Gallegly
  • (CA) Rohrabacher
  • (CA) Hunter
  • (CA) Issa
  • (CA) McKeon
  • (CA) Miller
  • (CA) Royce
  • (FL) Bilirakis
  • (FL) Young
  • (GA) Gingrey
  • (GA) Kingston
  • (IN) Burton
  • (IA) King
  • (KS) Tiahrt
  • (LA) Alexander
  • (MD) Bartlett
  • (MO) Akin
  • (NC) Jones
  • (NC) McHenry
  • (NC) McIntyre
  • (NC) Myrick
  • (OH) Latta
  • (TN) Blackburn
  • (TN) Roe
  • (TX) Carter
  • (TX) Conaway
  • (TX) Gohmert
  • (TX) Marchant
  • (TX) McCaul
  • (TX) Neugebauer
  • (TX) Sessions
  • (TX) Smith
  • (UT) Bishop
  • (UT) Chaffetz
  • (WV) Capito

New research by Dr. Steve Camarota at the Center for Immigration Studies finds that 81% of the jobs created in Texas between the years 2007 and 2011 went to newly-arrived immigrants. Conclusions were based on an analysis of data from the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey.

The new research also finds that:

  • In terms of numbers, between the second quarter of 2007, right before the recession began, and the second quarter of 2011, total employment in Texas increased by 279,000. Of this, 225,000 jobs went to immigrants (legal and illegal) who arrived in the United States in 2007 or later.
  • Of newly arrived immigrants who took a job in Texas, 93 percent were not U.S. citizens. Thus government data show that more than three-fourths of net job growth in Texas were taken by newly arrived non-citizens (legal and illegal).
  • The large share of job growth that went to immigrants is surprising because the native-born accounted for 69 percent of the growth in Texas’ working-age population (16 to 65). Thus, even though natives made up most of the growth in potential workers, most of the job growth went to immigrants.
  • The share of working-age natives holding a job in Texas declined significantly, from 71 percent in 2007 to 67 percent in 2011. This decline is very similar to the decline for natives in the United States as a whole and is an indication that the situation for native-born workers in Texas is very similar to the overall situation in the country despite the state’s job growth.
  • Of newly arrived immigrants who took jobs in Texas since 2007, we estimate that 50 percent (113,000) were illegal immigrants. Thus, about 40 percent of all the job growth in Texas since 2007 went to newly arrived illegal immigrants and 40 percent went to newly arrived legal immigrants.
  • Immigrants took jobs across the educational distribution. More than one out three (97,000) of newly arrived immigrants who took a job had at least some college.
  • These numbers raise the question of whether it makes sense to continue the current high level of legal immigration and also whether to continue to tolerate illegal immigration.
The full report can be found at the Center for Immigration Studies' website.

Comment:

Comrades, what this proves is we have to stop not only illegal immigration, but ALL immigration.

Now I understand that most immigrants just want a better life, but there aren't enough jobs for those us native born people and the immigrants who are already here. That's not just good old foreigner bashing talk. It's a fact. I, and all of you were born here. Why should we have to compete with immigrants for a job? Since when are their problems our problem? Add to that the fact that they drive wages down. They come from countries where workers make less in a day that the average American makes in an hour.

Here's a hypothetical situation. There's a particular job that pays typically $20 an hour. Someone immigrates here from a poor country legally. In his country, that same job might get him $15 a day. When he applies for the job here, they offer him say $12 an hour. He thinks that's fantastic pay, and gladly accepts it, whereas an American would think that's lousy pay, and would reject it, unless he was desperate. The employer wants to pay as little as possible, and the immigrant is qualified and willing to take 40% less than an American, so he gets the job, and the American is SOL, unless he too is willing to work for 40% less. Is that fair? No, but capitalism isn't supposed to be fair. Capitalism is business is business, and dog eat dog. That's reality in this world today.

There are those who point out that National Socialism has fewer freedoms than the current system. Well, maybe a few less. But most of the freedoms we THINK we have now are an illusion. We have freedom of speech? Hah ! Don't make me laugh. Okay, I can write what I write on this blog and haven't been arrested - yet. However, if I applied for a job and the employer Googled my name to see what came up, he would find this blog. Unless he was a National Socialist, I doubt I'd get the job. I would have lost out on a job because of my speech.

Is that freedom of speech? No it isn't. There are other ways than prison to deal with the politically incorrect. The best way is economic sanctions like being frozen out of employment.
Much better than prison. This way, the politically incorrect suffer and the state doesn't have to support them in prison at about $30,000 a year. Even if they qualify for SSI or welfare, it's way less than $30,000.

There have even been cases of people being evicted from their apartments for being politically incorrect.

Okay, we can say what we please here. But there are other consequences we might have to pay than prison. True freedom of speech means we can say what we please WITHOUT consequences.

What about freedom of the press? Ninety percent of the media, both written and broadcast are controlled by Jews. Most media outlets are incorporated, and the names of the CEOs and board of directors are public information. Check who runs the networks and major papers for yourselves if you don't believe me. BTW, a non-Jewish owner of the "Hickville Gazette", circulation 329 doesn't count. I'm talking about the big ones, not little papers of some one-horse-town.

Reporters are supposed to be impartial. But let's face it. NO ONE is impartial. Everyone has some sort of agenda.

The Jewish owners print or broadcast only that which THEY consider appropriate. If something doesn't fit their agenda, it doesn't get printed or broadcast. Or if it does, it's done in such a way as to MAKE it fit the agenda.

In National Socialist Germany, the people had more rights that our opponents would like you to believe. A few things they didn't have rights to were the right to be irresponsible, and the right to be an asshole. Pardon my language. I just couldn't think of another way to say it.

National Socialism does not tolerate that kind of behaviour. At this time, our society does. Is it any wonder that things are falling apart? Eventually, that sort of thing catches up with you.

National Socialism requires everyone to behave responsibly and sensibly at all times. Those who refuse to have no place in our society. HAIL VICTORY!

Dan 88!

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Minority babies almost the majority

White infants are on the verge of being displaced as the majority of newborns now that nearly half of babies in the USA are ethnic and racial minorities.
  • A boy kisses his brother at a newborn care class with his parents in Aurora, Colo. Nearly half of babies in the USA are ethnic and racial minorities.

    2009 photo by John Moore, Getty Images

    A boy kisses his brother at a newborn care class with his parents in Aurora, Colo. Nearly half of babies in the USA are ethnic and racial minorities.

2009 photo by John Moore, Getty Images

A boy kisses his brother at a newborn care class with his parents in Aurora, Colo. Nearly half of babies in the USA are ethnic and racial minorities.

Only 50.2% of babies under age 1 are white and not Hispanic, according to the 2010 Census — a sharp decline from 57.6% just 10 years earlier.

"We are almost at a minority-majority infant population," says Brookings Institution demographer William Frey, who analyzed the latest Census data. "We probably have passed it since the Census was taken" in April 2010.

The number of states where minority babies dominate has doubled to 14 since 2000. The balance has tipped in big states such as New York, Florida, New Jersey and Georgia.

Minorities have been the majority in Texas and California nurseries for more than two decades. In Texas, the majority of people under age 47 are minorities, in California, under 52.

Steady growth in the number of young U.S. Hispanics who have more children than whites is shrinking the ranks of non-Hispanic whites.

The shift is dramatic in states such as Florida and Nevada, where whites are in the minority among those younger than 38. A decade earlier, whites were the majority in all age groups in Florida and in Nevada, among all those above age 3.

In rural areas, the number of white children declined by more than 1 million or almost 10% from 2000 to 2010, says Kenneth Johnson, demographer at the University of New Hampshire's Carsey Institute.

The number of young white women of child-bearing age is declining while there is an increase in minority women of child-bearing age, Johnson says.

In Georgia's Whitfield County, home of Dalton, the "Carpet Capital of the World," more than 59% of infants were minorities in 2010 compared with 38.4% in 2000.

The area's floor-covering industry has attracted so many Hispanics that the North Georgia Health District, based in Dalton, has brought in translators and prints materials in Spanish, says Jennifer King, public information officer.

The nationwide changes are redefining who is a minority and who is not.

"These little babies … by the time they get to be in their 20s and 30s, the current racial and ethnic categories … won't have anything close to the meaning that (they have) today," Frey says. "When they think about white majority, it'll be something in the history books."

Comment:


I know that a lot of our critics read this blog, so I'd simply like to say this: Do you LIKE being in the minority? I don't. When I walk into an establishment and see I'm the only White man there, and people are speaking Spanish, I feel very out of place.

Back in the good old days when Whites were the majority virtually everywhere in this country, I'm sure many, if not most people of colour felt the same way. Simply put, better they feel out of place than me.

Now both comrades and critics, what can we do about it? I'm sure the critics will say, "There's nothing you CAN do. This is the way things are going, so get used to it."

This isn't true. We CAN do something about it. The only thing we can't do to change this trend is to do it with kindness, and brotherly love. In other words, we can't do anything about it and still be nice to everyone.

This is fine with me. I don't consider people of colour my brothers anyway. I consider an Aryan living clear across the country, or even abroad more my brother than the Latino fellow who lives next door to me (I really do have a Latino living next door to me, btw).

I will always work within the law. At this time, the ANP is a PRE-revolutionary organisation. We work within the law. If I have to hurt the feelings of people of colour, or offend them, and make them feel uncomfortable, then that's what I have to do. Tough on them. Anyone who expects to go through life without being offended or being made to feel uncomfortable by someone else must be from planet Bizarro.

Comrades, there is no doubt about it. Aryan folk, and our Eurocentric culture are being pushed aside by the Mestizos and their Latin culture. I simply don't want to live in a Latin country, nor do I want to be bothered learning Spanish. Honestly put, learning another language is a pain-in-the-ass. The Mestizos are the immigrants, so let them be put to the trouble of learning another language.

Sure, the Southwest used to be Mexico. Not any more. It was taken from them. It's ours by right of conquest, and I'm not about to give it back. Besides, they took it from the Spaniards, who took it from the Indians, so using their line of thinking, it rightfully belongs to the Indians. And btw, the Mexicans are partly descended from the Aztecs, Mayans, and Toltecs. They were not descended from American Indian tribes. I dare some Mexican to go over to an American Indian reservation and tell those Indians that the Mexicans have a birthright to this land. They'd probably break his face for that.

Comrades, the way to stop them from taking back this land is to unite against them. Nation-wide, we're still the majority, and btw, Blacks aren't too crazy about Latin immigrants either. Just ask a Black Panther what he thinks of Latin immigrants.

Unity is the answer, and the best place to start is the ANP. The Mestizos are only a symptom of the problem. The real cause of this is ZOG and their Judeo-Capitalist masters. We have to unite against them, destroy their rotten system that places financial gain above the rights of the White worker, or any worker for that matter. These immigrant workers may think they're getting good pay, which I suppose they are compared to where they came from, but they are being exploited for capital gain, pure and simple.

The real enemies are in Washington D.C., New York City, and Hollywood, Ca. They are of course ZOG, the Judeo-Capitalists whose financial capitol is New York City (primarily), and their publicity agents who run the media with Hollywood as their capitol.

These are the real enemies of the Aryan Folk. If enough of us unite together, we CAN stop them. But only if we can all work together as one. The ANP is the best place to start. If you're not yet a supporter, go to our site, download an application and send it in ASAP.

BTW, for those naysayers who say we haven't got a snowball's chance in hell, let me point out that in 1925, a newspaper in Munich (I forget the name) called Hitler a "pathetic joke that hasn't a chance of succeeding." Kind of reminds me of the headline in the Chicago Tribune(?) in the Truman-Dewey election that read, "DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN". So don't laugh, because it may be we who have the last one. HAIL VICTORY!

Thanks again to Comrade Raymond for the story.

Dan 88!




Minority babies almost the majority

White infants are on the verge of being displaced as the majority of newborns now that nearly half of babies in the USA are ethnic and racial minorities.
  • A boy kisses his brother at a newborn care class with his parents in Aurora, Colo. Nearly half of babies in the USA are ethnic and racial minorities.

    2009 photo by John Moore, Getty Images

    A boy kisses his brother at a newborn care class with his parents in Aurora, Colo. Nearly half of babies in the USA are ethnic and racial minorities.

2009 photo by John Moore, Getty Images

A boy kisses his brother at a newborn care class with his parents in Aurora, Colo. Nearly half of babies in the USA are ethnic and racial minorities.

Only 50.2% of babies under age 1 are white and not Hispanic, according to the 2010 Census — a sharp decline from 57.6% just 10 years earlier.

"We are almost at a minority-majority infant population," says Brookings Institution demographer William Frey, who analyzed the latest Census data. "We probably have passed it since the Census was taken" in April 2010.

The number of states where minority babies dominate has doubled to 14 since 2000. The balance has tipped in big states such as New York, Florida, New Jersey and Georgia.

Minorities have been the majority in Texas and California nurseries for more than two decades. In Texas, the majority of people under age 47 are minorities, in California, under 52.

Steady growth in the number of young U.S. Hispanics who have more children than whites is shrinking the ranks of non-Hispanic whites.

The shift is dramatic in states such as Florida and Nevada, where whites are in the minority among those younger than 38. A decade earlier, whites were the majority in all age groups in Florida and in Nevada, among all those above age 3.

In rural areas, the number of white children declined by more than 1 million or almost 10% from 2000 to 2010, says Kenneth Johnson, demographer at the University of New Hampshire's Carsey Institute.

The number of young white women of child-bearing age is declining while there is an increase in minority women of child-bearing age, Johnson says.

In Georgia's Whitfield County, home of Dalton, the "Carpet Capital of the World," more than 59% of infants were minorities in 2010 compared with 38.4% in 2000.

The area's floor-covering industry has attracted so many Hispanics that the North Georgia Health District, based in Dalton, has brought in translators and prints materials in Spanish, says Jennifer King, public information officer.

The nationwide changes are redefining who is a minority and who is not.

"These little babies … by the time they get to be in their 20s and 30s, the current racial and ethnic categories … won't have anything close to the meaning that (they have) today," Frey says. "When they think about white majority, it'll be something in the history books."

Comment:


I know that a lot of our critics read this blog, so I'd simply like to say this: Do you LIKE being in the minority? I don't. When I walk into an establishment and see I'm the only White man there, and people are speaking Spanish, I feel very out of place.

Back in the good old days when Whites were the majority virtually everywhere in this country, I'm sure many, if not most people of colour felt the same way. Simply put, better they feel out of place than me.

Now both comrades and critics, what can we do about it? I'm sure the critics will say, "There's nothing you CAN do. This is the way things are going, so get used to it."

This isn't true. We CAN do something about it. The only thing we can't do to change this trend is to do it with kindness, and brotherly love. In other words, we can't do anything about it and still be nice to everyone.

This is fine with me. I don't consider people of colour my brothers anyway. I consider an Aryan living clear across the country, or even abroad more my brother than the Latino fellow who lives next door to me (I really do have a Latino living next door to me, btw).

I will always work within the law. At this time, the ANP is a PRE-revolutionary organisation. We work within the law. If I have to hurt the feelings of people of colour, or offend them, and make them feel uncomfortable, then that's what I have to do. Tough on them. Anyone who expects to go through life without being offended or being made to feel uncomfortable by someone else must be from planet Bizarro.

Comrades, there is no doubt about it. Aryan folk, and our Eurocentric culture are being pushed aside by the Mestizos and their Latin culture. I simply don't want to live in a Latin country, nor do I want to be bothered learning Spanish. Honestly put, learning another language is a pain-in-the-ass. The Mestizos are the immigrants, so let them be put to the trouble of learning another language.

Sure, the Southwest used to be Mexico. Not any more. It was taken from them. It's ours by right of conquest, and I'm not about to give it back. Besides, they took it from the Spaniards, who took it from the Indians, so using their line of thinking, it rightfully belongs to the Indians. And btw, the Mexicans are partly descended from the Aztecs, Mayans, and Toltecs. They were not descended from American Indian tribes. I dare some Mexican to go over to an American Indian reservation and tell those Indians that the Mexicans have a birthright to this land. They'd probably break his face for that.

Comrades, the way to stop them from taking back this land is to unite against them. Nation-wide, we're still the majority, and btw, Blacks aren't too crazy about Latin immigrants either. Just ask a Black Panther what he thinks of Latin immigrants.

Unity is the answer, and the best place to start is the ANP. The Mestizos are only a symptom of the problem. The real cause of this is ZOG and their Judeo-Capitalist masters. We have to unite against them, destroy their rotten system that places financial gain above the rights of the White worker, or any worker for that matter. These immigrant workers may think they're getting good pay, which I suppose they are compared to where they came from, but they are being exploited for capital gain, pure and simple.

The real enemies are in Washington D.C., New York City, and Hollywood, Ca. They are of course ZOG, the Judeo-Capitalists whose financial capitol is New York City (primarily), and their publicity agents who run the media with Hollywood as their capitol.

These are the real enemies of the Aryan Folk. If enough of us unite together, we CAN stop them. But only if we can all work together as one. The ANP is the best place to start. If you're not yet a supporter, go to our site, download an application and send it in ASAP.

BTW, for those naysayers who say we haven't got a snowball's chance in hell, let me point out that in 1925, a newspaper in Munich (I forget the name) called Hitler a "pathetic joke that hasn't a chance of succeeding." Kind of reminds me of the headline in the Chicago Tribune(?) in the Truman-Dewey election that read, "DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN". So don't laugh, because it may be we who have the last one. HAIL VICTORY!

Thanks again to Comrade Raymond for the story.

Dan 88!