A Chance To Put A Stop To Anchor Babies

Rep. Steve King Introduces Birthright Citizenship Bill

Updated Thursday, January 6, 2011, 6:11 PM EST - posted on NumbersUSA.org
Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), a member of the House Immigration Subcommittee, has introduced legislation that would eliminate the granting of automatic citizenship to babies born in the United States. In the past, the bill has been offered by former Congressman, and now current Governor of Georgia, Nathan Deal.

The Birthright Citizenship Act of 2011, H.R.140, would require that at least one parent be a U.S. citizen or legal permanent resident for the newborn to receive automatic citizenship.

“The current practice of extending U.S. citizenship to hundreds of thousands of ‘Anchor Babies’ every year arises from the misapplication of the Constitution’s citizenship clause and creates an incentive for illegal aliens to cross our border," Rep. King said. "The ‘Birthright Citizenship Act of 2011’ ends this practice by making it clear that a child born in the United States to illegal alien parents does not meet the standard for birthright citizenship already established by the Constitution. Passage of this bill will ensure that immigration law breakers are not rewarded, will close the door to future waves of extended family chain migration, and will help to bring an end to the global ‘birth tourism’ industry.”

Several other Congressmen issued statements in reaction to Rep. King's bill, including Rep. Gary Miller (R-Calif.) who took over sponsorship of the bill after Deal's retirement last Congress.

“It is unfair to grant birthright citizenship to children of illegal immigrants because it undermines the intention of the Fourteenth Amendment, rewards those that have recklessly broken our nation’s immigration laws, and costs American taxpayers billions annually," Rep. Miller said. "By simply closing this loophole, we will save taxpayers billions and reduce the appeal of entering the United States illegally. This bill simply makes sense.”

“Throughout my time in Congress, combating illegal immigration has always been a high priority of mine," Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-Ga.), who is also expected to offer a bill that would eliminate chain migration, said. "Addressing the birthright citizenship issue needs to be at the forefront of this effort, and I am pleased to advance this initiative with my colleagues. I will continue working on this - and several other measures - to stem the overwhelming tide of illegal immigration in this country.”

“Representative King is absolutely right with the introduction of this birthright citizenship legislation, and I am very proud to join him as an original co-sponsor on this bill," Rep. Rob Woodall (R-Ga.) said. "This Congress must take bold steps to solve our illegal immigration crisis. An important part of immigration reform must be removing the incentives that are in place encouraging illegal immigration. Representative King’s bill is a good step in that direction.”

Comment:

This bill will have a tougher time passing the Senate, but the DREAM ACT was killed, despite the liberal's belief that it would pass because of the Democratic majority. The Senate has fewer Democrats this year, but they are still the majority. They bowed to the will of the people with the DREAM ACT, so hopefully, they'll do the same again.

Remember, the Fourteenth Amendment was never, never intended as a backdoor to immigration amnesty. Its purpose was to give the children of newly freed slaves automatic citizenship. I should also remind you, that Native Americans were not considered citizens until the 1920s. American Indians had to apply and qualify for citizenship just like any other immigrant. The Fourteenth amendment also gave the children of Indians who became citizens automatic citizenship. It was not designed to reward criminals who illegally run our borders with citizenship for their children, which they believe entitles them to stay because they are the parents of these anchor babies (oops, the libertards say we're not allowed to say anchor babies).

What I'm wondering about is what will Obama do if HR 140 makes it to his desk? He could very well veto it, and it surely would not have enough congressional support to override a presidential veto. On the other hand, if he does veto it, he'll have to explain why. I don't see how he can come up with any logical reason other than sympathy for illegals, and a desire to grant them some kind of amnesty. If he were to say that, he can definitely kiss a second term goodbye. The people have spoken: NO AMNESTY!

Despite what's going on with immigration reform, I still have little faith in our politicians. They're only doing what they have to do to stay in office. On the one side, you have the liberals who want amnesty for illegals because of their bleeding hearts. On the other, you have the Judeo-Capitalists who want amnesty so they can continue to exploit illegals for their profit. Immigration reform is something that's long over due. Personally, I don't care what the politicians motives for getting it done are, just as long as they do it.