Mexico, several other countries seek to halt Georgia's new anti-illegal immigration law

By Jeremy Redmon

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

The Anti-Defamation League, Mexico and the governments of several Central and South American countries filed court papers Wednesday in support of efforts to halt Georgia’s tough new immigration enforcement law.

The other countries joining on the side of those seeking a preliminary injunction in the case include Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Peru.

The American Civil Liberties Union, the Southern Poverty Law Center and several other civil and immigrant rights groups filed a federal class-action lawsuit against Georgia's law this month and are now asking a judge to halt the measure pending the outcome of their case. They argue the measure – also known as House Bill 87 – is preempted by federal law and is unconstitutional.

“HB 87 substantially and inappropriately burdens the consistent country to country relations between Mexico and the United States of America,” Mexico says in its brief in support of halting the law, “interfering with the strategic diplomatic interests of the two countries and encouraging an imminent threat of state-sanctioned bias or discrimination.”

State officials filed court papers this week seeking to dismiss the lawsuit. They say the law is constitutional and predict it will survive the court challenge. Proponents say the state needed to act to curb illegal immigration because the federal government has failed to secure the nation's borders. Illegal immigrants, say supporters of Georgia's new law, are burdening the state's taxpayer-funded resources, including public schools, jails and hospitals.

U.S. District Judge Thomas Thrash has set the first hearing in the case for 10 a.m. Monday. He indicated he might rule from the bench that day on the plaintiffs’ request to halt the law.

Similar to a law Arizona enacted last year, Georgia’s measure empowers police to investigate the immigration status of certain suspects. It punishes people who transport or harbor illegal immigrants in Georgia or use fake identification to get a job here. And it requires many businesses to use the federal E-Verify program to ensure their newly hired workers are eligible to work in the United States. Much of the law is scheduled to start taking effect on July 1.

Comment:

WTF?! What I'd like to know, is how is it even legally possible for a foreign country to sue the United States because of our immigration policies?

What I'd like to see happen is an investigation of American companies that have facilities in these countries to find out if they are involved in this in any way - even indirectly. It wouldn't surprise me if the hand of Judeo-Capitalism ISN'T involved. They wouldn't want to stop the flow of their slave labour force.

Unfortunately, such an investigation would never happen. Our government is always in the back pockets of big business, and even if they weren't, the foreign governments involved would never cooperate because they wouldn't want to lose their place in the corporate American gravy train.

Comrades, the illegal alien situation is the greatest threat to the White working class in America today. Not only are these brown invaders taking our jobs, but they are pushing our culture and language aside and replacing them with theirs. I for one do not want to live in a Latin American country.

This latest Judeo-Capitalist effort is another step towards true Communism in this country. If we don't keep working our asses off, if we let up, if we give in, then it's the end for our Folk. The ANP is all that stands between the Swastika, and the Hammer and Sickle. Hail Victory!

Dan 88!

Mexico, several other countries seek to halt Georgia's new anti-illegal immigration law

By Jeremy Redmon

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

The Anti-Defamation League, Mexico and the governments of several Central and South American countries filed court papers Wednesday in support of efforts to halt Georgia’s tough new immigration enforcement law.

The other countries joining on the side of those seeking a preliminary injunction in the case include Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Peru.

The American Civil Liberties Union, the Southern Poverty Law Center and several other civil and immigrant rights groups filed a federal class-action lawsuit against Georgia's law this month and are now asking a judge to halt the measure pending the outcome of their case. They argue the measure – also known as House Bill 87 – is preempted by federal law and is unconstitutional.

“HB 87 substantially and inappropriately burdens the consistent country to country relations between Mexico and the United States of America,” Mexico says in its brief in support of halting the law, “interfering with the strategic diplomatic interests of the two countries and encouraging an imminent threat of state-sanctioned bias or discrimination.”

State officials filed court papers this week seeking to dismiss the lawsuit. They say the law is constitutional and predict it will survive the court challenge. Proponents say the state needed to act to curb illegal immigration because the federal government has failed to secure the nation's borders. Illegal immigrants, say supporters of Georgia's new law, are burdening the state's taxpayer-funded resources, including public schools, jails and hospitals.

U.S. District Judge Thomas Thrash has set the first hearing in the case for 10 a.m. Monday. He indicated he might rule from the bench that day on the plaintiffs’ request to halt the law.

Similar to a law Arizona enacted last year, Georgia’s measure empowers police to investigate the immigration status of certain suspects. It punishes people who transport or harbor illegal immigrants in Georgia or use fake identification to get a job here. And it requires many businesses to use the federal E-Verify program to ensure their newly hired workers are eligible to work in the United States. Much of the law is scheduled to start taking effect on July 1.

Comment:

WTF?! What I'd like to know, is how is it even legally possible for a foreign country to sue the United States because of our immigration policies?

What I'd like to see happen is an investigation of American companies that have facilities in these countries to find out if they are involved in this in any way - even indirectly. It wouldn't surprise me if the hand of Judeo-Capitalism ISN'T involved. They wouldn't want to stop the flow of their slave labour force.

Unfortunately, such an investigation would never happen. Our government is always in the back pockets of big business, and even if they weren't, the foreign governments involved would never cooperate because they wouldn't want to lose their place in the corporate American gravy train.

Comrades, the illegal alien situation is the greatest threat to the White working class in America today. Not only are these brown invaders taking our jobs, but they are pushing our culture and language aside and replacing them with theirs. I for one do not want to live in a Latin American country.

This latest Judeo-Capitalist effort is another step towards true Communism in this country. If we don't keep working our asses off, if we let up, if we give in, then it's the end for our Folk. The ANP is all that stands between the Swastika, and the Hammer and Sickle. Hail Victory!

Dan 88!

Deal: Immigration bill signing 'historic moment'

By The Associated Press

Gov. Nathan Deal

ATLANTA - Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal, calling it "a rather historic moment,'' on Friday signed a bill that cracks down on illegal immigration in the state by increasing some enforcement powers and requiring many employers to check the immigration status of new hires.

The new law the subject of heated debate in the Legislature shares some similarities to a controversial law enacted last year in Arizona and another enacted this year in Utah. Part or all of those two laws have been blocked by federal judges, and opponents have said they'll sue to try to block Georgia's law.

It authorizes law enforcement officers to check the immigration status of certain suspects and to detain them if they are in the country illegally. It penalizes people who knowingly transport or harbor illegal immigrants and makes it a felony to present false documents or information when applying for a job.

Most parts of the new law are set to enter into effect July 1. A requirement for private employers to use a federal database called E-Verify to check the immigration status of new hires is set to be phased in, with all employers with more than 10 employees required to comply by July 2013.

Opponents of the measure say it could lead to racial profiling and could harm the state's economy, while supporters say it's necessary because illegal immigrants are a drain on Georgia's resources.

A federal judge blocked some provisions of Arizona's law last year after the federal government sued, and an appeals court upheld that decision last month. Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer said Monday the state plans to appeal directly to the U.S. Supreme Court.

A federal judge on Tuesday blocked a similar law enacted this year in Utah after civil liberties groups sued to keep it from entering into effect. That judge cited similarities to the most controversial parts of Arizona's law. A hearing is set for mid-July to determine whether an injunction will be issued or the law can go into effect.

Comment:

Once again, the people have spoken, and once again ZOG is ignoring them. Another state cracks down on illegals, and ZOG begins another lawsuit. I wonder what the reaction would be if these states ignored ZOG and their courts and began enforcing their new laws anyway? With about half the states in the Union enacting tougher immigration laws, ZOG would have its hands full.

If I were a state governor, I'd discuss the possibility with other governors, and see where it takes us.

We have got to start standing up to ZOG and saying ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! Until we get some backbone, ZOG will continue to flaunt the will of the people. It's a shame that we have so many people who are either brainwashed or suffering from chronic apathy (it's epidemic these days). If enough of us would stand together, we could affect some real change. Unfortunately, there's almost always a game on TV, so no one wants to be bothered. I hate to say it, but people are getting exactly what they deserve. Immigrant invasion, devaluation of the dollar, skyrocketing prices, uncaring leaders, heartless Judeo-Capitalists. Until enough people are willing to put out a little effort, our enemies will continue to win.

Comrades, the ANP can't do it alone. We need everyone to pull together. Put down that beer, turn off that TV and DO SOMETHING. Our May blitz is a good start. I'm up to 200 pieces of literature this month. How about you? If you haven't done yours yet, it's not too late. Don't put it off, get it done now!

Attending our Illinois conference next month and/or Laurens in July is another thing you can do. Don't be afraid to take a couple of days off. Most of you have vacation time. Use some of it. It may cut into your fishing trip in August, but we all have to make sacrifices if we want change. If you don't have any vacation time, call in sick, if they don't require a doctor's note. Sacrifice, comrades, sacrifice.

BTW, if it's a question of transportation, since most of us are driving all or part of the way, email or write HQ and tell them where you live, that you'd like to attend, but need a ride, and if anyone
happens to be going through their area, you may be able to get a ride. For security reasons, I will NOT give out anyone's travel plans, including my own on this blog. You'll have to go through HQ, and they won't be able to help you unless you are an Official Supporter. I hope to see many of you there.

Deal: Immigration bill signing 'historic moment'

By The Associated Press

Gov. Nathan Deal

ATLANTA - Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal, calling it "a rather historic moment,'' on Friday signed a bill that cracks down on illegal immigration in the state by increasing some enforcement powers and requiring many employers to check the immigration status of new hires.

The new law the subject of heated debate in the Legislature shares some similarities to a controversial law enacted last year in Arizona and another enacted this year in Utah. Part or all of those two laws have been blocked by federal judges, and opponents have said they'll sue to try to block Georgia's law.

It authorizes law enforcement officers to check the immigration status of certain suspects and to detain them if they are in the country illegally. It penalizes people who knowingly transport or harbor illegal immigrants and makes it a felony to present false documents or information when applying for a job.

Most parts of the new law are set to enter into effect July 1. A requirement for private employers to use a federal database called E-Verify to check the immigration status of new hires is set to be phased in, with all employers with more than 10 employees required to comply by July 2013.

Opponents of the measure say it could lead to racial profiling and could harm the state's economy, while supporters say it's necessary because illegal immigrants are a drain on Georgia's resources.

A federal judge blocked some provisions of Arizona's law last year after the federal government sued, and an appeals court upheld that decision last month. Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer said Monday the state plans to appeal directly to the U.S. Supreme Court.

A federal judge on Tuesday blocked a similar law enacted this year in Utah after civil liberties groups sued to keep it from entering into effect. That judge cited similarities to the most controversial parts of Arizona's law. A hearing is set for mid-July to determine whether an injunction will be issued or the law can go into effect.

Comment:

Once again, the people have spoken, and once again ZOG is ignoring them. Another state cracks down on illegals, and ZOG begins another lawsuit. I wonder what the reaction would be if these states ignored ZOG and their courts and began enforcing their new laws anyway? With about half the states in the Union enacting tougher immigration laws, ZOG would have its hands full.

If I were a state governor, I'd discuss the possibility with other governors, and see where it takes us.

We have got to start standing up to ZOG and saying ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! Until we get some backbone, ZOG will continue to flaunt the will of the people. It's a shame that we have so many people who are either brainwashed or suffering from chronic apathy (it's epidemic these days). If enough of us would stand together, we could affect some real change. Unfortunately, there's almost always a game on TV, so no one wants to be bothered. I hate to say it, but people are getting exactly what they deserve. Immigrant invasion, devaluation of the dollar, skyrocketing prices, uncaring leaders, heartless Judeo-Capitalists. Until enough people are willing to put out a little effort, our enemies will continue to win.

Comrades, the ANP can't do it alone. We need everyone to pull together. Put down that beer, turn off that TV and DO SOMETHING. Our May blitz is a good start. I'm up to 200 pieces of literature this month. How about you? If you haven't done yours yet, it's not too late. Don't put it off, get it done now!

Attending our Illinois conference next month and/or Laurens in July is another thing you can do. Don't be afraid to take a couple of days off. Most of you have vacation time. Use some of it. It may cut into your fishing trip in August, but we all have to make sacrifices if we want change. If you don't have any vacation time, call in sick, if they don't require a doctor's note. Sacrifice, comrades, sacrifice.

BTW, if it's a question of transportation, since most of us are driving all or part of the way, email or write HQ and tell them where you live, that you'd like to attend, but need a ride, and if anyone
happens to be going through their area, you may be able to get a ride. For security reasons, I will NOT give out anyone's travel plans, including my own on this blog. You'll have to go through HQ, and they won't be able to help you unless you are an Official Supporter. I hope to see many of you there.

Black Caucus Seeks To Dissolve All White Communities

The Georgia Legislative Black Caucus filed a lawsuit Monday against the state of Georgia seeking to dissolve the city charters of Dunwoody, Sandy Springs, Johns Creek, Milton and Chattahoochee Hills. Further, the lawmakers, joined by civil rights leader the Rev. Joseph Lowery, aim to dash any hopes of a Milton County.

http://patriotupdate.com/4965/black-lawm...-too-white



The lawsuit, filed in a North Georgia U.S. District Court Monday, claims that the state circumvented the normal legislative process and set aside its own criteria when creating the “super-majority white ” cities within Fulton and DeKalb counties. The result, it argues, is to dilute minority votes in those areas, violating the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution.

Rep. Lynne Riley, R-Johns Creek, called the lawsuit “frivolous” and “disrespectful to the citizens of these cities who are most satisfied with their government.”

Riley was active in creating Sandy Springs and the subsequent cities while serving as a Fulton County commissioner.

“These jurisdictions were based on geography and nothing else,” she said. “We haven’t seen any evidence of any disadvantage based on the creation of new cities. We’ve watched the Fulton County budget continue to grow … to say there was damage done by this creation, there are no facts to support that, and I would reject it.”

Comment:

Obama and the Black Lawmakers simply don't want any all White communities - even if there was no violation of the law. It just sticks in their craws.

Let me ask this: Why aren't their any minorities in these communities? It's not because they're being deliberately kept out. They either can't afford to live there, or simply no minority person has had the desire to live in those particular communities.

It also serves to help them curtail "White Flight". We won't be able to flee, if there's nowhere to flee to. They know as soon as we're gone, these communities turn into ghettos, because they simply are incapable of properly running their own towns. Without us, everything just goes to hell in a hand basket. They just won't admit it because the few intelligent ones are embarrassed by the average member of their race being incapable of properly maintaining their "hoods" without Whitey's help.

I think it's time the Blacks got off that "trying to deny us our voting rights" crap. Firstly, Blacks practically run the state. When was the last time Atlanta had a White mayor? We have a Black president. There are Black congressmen, senators, cabinet members, supreme court justices, generals, admirals, etc. You name it. No one these days, except extremists would even try and deny them proper voting rights.

C'mon guys (Blacks). You have your rights. No one is trying to take them away. Let's get on to something else.

Black Caucus Seeks To Dissolve All White Communities

The Georgia Legislative Black Caucus filed a lawsuit Monday against the state of Georgia seeking to dissolve the city charters of Dunwoody, Sandy Springs, Johns Creek, Milton and Chattahoochee Hills. Further, the lawmakers, joined by civil rights leader the Rev. Joseph Lowery, aim to dash any hopes of a Milton County.

http://patriotupdate.com/4965/black-lawm...-too-white



The lawsuit, filed in a North Georgia U.S. District Court Monday, claims that the state circumvented the normal legislative process and set aside its own criteria when creating the “super-majority white ” cities within Fulton and DeKalb counties. The result, it argues, is to dilute minority votes in those areas, violating the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution.

Rep. Lynne Riley, R-Johns Creek, called the lawsuit “frivolous” and “disrespectful to the citizens of these cities who are most satisfied with their government.”

Riley was active in creating Sandy Springs and the subsequent cities while serving as a Fulton County commissioner.

“These jurisdictions were based on geography and nothing else,” she said. “We haven’t seen any evidence of any disadvantage based on the creation of new cities. We’ve watched the Fulton County budget continue to grow … to say there was damage done by this creation, there are no facts to support that, and I would reject it.”

Comment:

Obama and the Black Lawmakers simply don't want any all White communities - even if there was no violation of the law. It just sticks in their craws.

Let me ask this: Why aren't their any minorities in these communities? It's not because they're being deliberately kept out. They either can't afford to live there, or simply no minority person has had the desire to live in those particular communities.

It also serves to help them curtail "White Flight". We won't be able to flee, if there's nowhere to flee to. They know as soon as we're gone, these communities turn into ghettos, because they simply are incapable of properly running their own towns. Without us, everything just goes to hell in a hand basket. They just won't admit it because the few intelligent ones are embarrassed by the average member of their race being incapable of properly maintaining their "hoods" without Whitey's help.

I think it's time the Blacks got off that "trying to deny us our voting rights" crap. Firstly, Blacks practically run the state. When was the last time Atlanta had a White mayor? We have a Black president. There are Black congressmen, senators, cabinet members, supreme court justices, generals, admirals, etc. You name it. No one these days, except extremists would even try and deny them proper voting rights.

C'mon guys (Blacks). You have your rights. No one is trying to take them away. Let's get on to something else.