Government Shutdown - They Don't Do Anything For The People Anyway!

SHERYL GAY STOLBERG and ROBERT PEAR
updated 4/6/2011 1:00:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON — The National Zoo would close, but the lions and tigers would get fed; Yellowstone and other national parks would shut down. The Internal Revenue Service could stop issuing refund checks. Customs and Border Patrol agents training officials in Afghanistan might have to come home. And thousands of government-issued BlackBerrys would go silent.

This is what a government shutdown might look like.

With budget talks between Republicans and Democrats far from resolution, official Washington braced on Tuesday for a replay of the Great Government Shutdowns of 1995 and 1996. For weeks, the Obama administration has been quietly examining the experience of the mid-1990s as a kind of shutdown survival guide. Now those preparations have kicked into high gear.

The White House Office of Management and Budget directed the heads of federal agencies on late Monday to share contingency plans with senior managers. On Capitol Hill, the chairman of the Committee on House Administration warned “nonessential employees” on Tuesday to turn off their BlackBerrys during a shutdown, or risk punishment for working while on furlough.

Prepping at museums

And at the Smithsonian Institution, employees were preparing for a lot of disappointed tourists. The 1995 and 1996 shutdowns occurred in the dead of winter. Now it is spring break; Linda St. Thomas, a spokeswoman, said the Smithsonian has sold 23,000 advance tickets for cafeteria meals and Imax movies in April. Her staff was prepared to print “Closed Due to Government Shutdown” signs to tape to windows in their museums.

“I got a call yesterday from a woman in Cincinnati; she was bringing a big family, two cars, they were going to drive in from Ohio on Friday,” Ms. St. Thomas said. “She wanted to know, what should she do? I said, ‘I don’t know.’ ”

In any shutdown, the government does not completely cease functioning, of course. Activities that are essential to national security, like military operations, can continue. Air traffic control and other public safety functions are exempt from shutdowns. Federal prisons still operate; law enforcement and criminal investigations can continue. Employees deemed essential to the functioning of government can come to work. (In ego-driven Washington, a federal shutdown forces high-powered workers to confront their self-worth. Many federal officials insisted on showing up in previous shutdowns, apparently unable to come to grips with idea they might not be considered vital.)

During the shutdowns of 1995 and 1996, cleanup work on toxic waste sites was halted because contractors could not be paid and Environmental Protection Agency officials could not monitor cleanup work. Work on more than 3,500 bankruptcy cases was suspended, and the government took a break from going after deadbeat dads. Tens of thousands of passport and visa applications went unprocessed.

Yet in preparation for a possible shutdown of 2011, officials have discovered that the lessons of more than a decade ago are not always relevant. An entire federal agency, the Department of Homeland Security, has come into existence since then. Most of its employees would continue working at airports, borders and seaports as usual, but many managers at headquarters would be temporarily out of work, a federal official said.

Economic fallout fears

The government is much more heavily involved in the mortgage lending market today than in the mid-1990s, and officials are deeply concerned about the economic fallout should the Federal Housing Administration stop guaranteeing loans. Yet Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, though government-owned, would continue to operate.

Officials are also concerned about unemployment benefits, paid jointly by the federal government and the states. In 1995, with the jobless rate at 5.6 percent, states were able to draw on their trust funds to pay the federal portion. Today, many state funds are borrowing from the federal government.

And the growth of the Internet is another big change in the bureaucratic landscape, creating entirely new questions for policy makers to contend with.

“We realized that the world was a very different place in 1995 than now,” said one official familiar with the planning, who insisted on anonymity to speak candidly about it. “In 1995, you really didn’t have the question of: Are Web sites essential? Is e-mail essential? What do you do about people’s BlackBerrys? Is a Twitter feed an essential way of communicating? None of that existed. These are all legal questions to figure out.”

Much would depend on how long a shutdown lasts. (The longest previous episode ran three weeks.) At the federal courts, officials said they could continue operations for 10 days to two weeks, using money from fees paid by people who have filed civil suits. “After that, who knows?” said Karen E. Redmond, a spokeswoman for the Administrative Office of the United States Courts.

Blackberries silenced

One key question is whether federal employees — the government work force includes more than 1.9 million civilian workers — would be compensated in the event of a shutdown. Many of those workers are deemed nonessential, but federal officials have not provided an estimate of the number.

John Berry, director of the Office of Personnel Management, posted information on the agency’s Web site on Tuesday night saying that “federal agencies do not have the authority to pay their employees during a shutdown.” Congress, he said, would decide whether to pay employees who are furloughed. In the past, Congress often provided such pay, but the political climate now is different, and lawmakers might be less willing to do so.

Members of Congress and White House officials have broad discretion about whether to declare their employees essential. In previous shutdowns, most worked with skeleton crews.
GOP turns 180 on Medicare

The chairman of the Committee on House Administration, Representative Dan Lungren, Republican of California, sent detailed guidance on Tuesday to all House members and offices on what they could and could not do during a government shutdown.

A sample letter he provided warned: “Working in any way during a period of furlough, even as a volunteer, is grounds for disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment. To avoid violating this prohibition, we strongly recommend that you turn your BlackBerries off for the duration of the furlough.”

Around Washington on Tuesday, there was a sense of nervous anticipation — and some confusion. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner said a shutdown would have a “very material” impact on his department, but he declined to elaborate. Administration officials said the Treasury would continue one indispensable role: holding regular auctions of federal debt, so the government could borrow more money from the public.

The Office of Management and Budget is not making its contingency plans public, a source of irritation to the American Federation of Government Employees, the union that represents more than 600,000 federal workers. Its president, John Gage, said Tuesday that the union has sued the Obama administration under the Freedom of Information Act to compel the plans’ release.

“I think everybody needs to get a better idea of what a shutdown means — who is essential and who is not,” Mr. Gage said.

Reporting was contributed by Eric Lipton, John M. Broder, Binyamin Appelbaum and Matthew L. Wald.

This article, headlined "As shutdown looms, agencies brace for its impact," first appeared in The New York Times.

Copyright © 2010 The New York Times

Comment:

Short comment this time (for a change). If the government shuts down, who'll notice? They don't do jack spit for us anyway!

Seriously, the ones who will really be hurt are everyone on Social Security. I've been told checks will still go out, but I doubt they'd tell us the truth if they weren't. I'm not all that worried about ZOG's little paid minions. If you work for the federal government, you should have thought of that before you took the job.

If things will be as bad as predicted, hopefully, this will really wake people up, or at the very least make them mad as hell so they will want to get off their asses and do something about it, like become Official ANP Supporters.

If the government does shut down, the first thing I'll say is, "I told you so." Maybe I won't publicly gloat. I'll just laugh quietly to myself.