Thursday, January 27, 2011

Where I Stand On Elections

As we all know comrades, voting is mostly a farce in this country. Two hundred years ago - even 150 years ago it may have been important, but now it's all a charade. For the most part, I don't bother, but there are a few exceptions.

When it comes to Federal elections like president, congressmen, and senators, I have nothing but utter contempt. In keeping with the farcical nature of elections, and to amuse myself, if I have time on election day, I'll go and cast my vote for a joke candidate like Homer Simpson or Peter Griffin.

I do the same for governor, state senators, and assemblymen. Under certain circumstances, with local offices, I might vote for an actual candidate. It just all depends on the issues at hand, and the office in question, and who's running. But for the most part, it's a waste of time in my book.

Naturally if the candidate is National Socialist, that changes everything, unless the candidate is NSM. Under the circumstances, considering their leadership and affiliation with the "Joy Of Satan" cult, I could never in good conscience vote for an NSM candidate. But if there is a true National Socialist candidate on the ballot, we must do everything we can to support him or her.

I do pay attention to elections. In the last election, although I didn't vote for either governor, senator, or congressman, I was hoping that Senator Boxer would lose. What does it matter, you say? They're all alike! Absolutely. But Boxer has been in office over 20 years. Time for her to go and let some other crooked politician get their chance at making their fortune by standing on the backs of the workers. Even though they are all the same, no one individual should be allowed to make a life's career out of one office. I publicly said that about one of my opponents in the school board election. Kazalunas (yes, Mexican) was Board Chair and a member for 20 years. TOO LONG - PERIOD! My first choice naturally was to win. My second choice was for him to lose. I got my second choice. He lost. However, I would have loved for us both to have won. He hates my guts and I would have loved to have seen his face when he found out he was going to have to serve on the board with me. That would have been just priceless.

Now as to propositions, that's a little different. Propositions give the people a more direct say in what does or does not become law. If ZOG wants to stick us with a new tax or fee in the form of a Proposition, you better bloody well believe I'll be at the polls voting a most definite NO! Some of you may say if ZOG can't get money from us that way, they'll find another. I'm sure they will. But the point is, if ZOG is going to take my money, they're going to have to fight me for it. I'm not going to freely open my wallet and hand over my hard earned money to a government that is incapable of managing the money it already has.

Because of propositions, California still does not have Gay marriage. Our politicians must bring in the budget on time or their pay and benefits will be suspended. Our motor vehicle registration will not be raised to pay for state parks. The money will now come from increased entry fees. Sure, ZOG still gets their money, but only those who use the parks will pay. Those of us who don't will not have to. I don't use the parks. I shouldn't have to pay. If you use them and don't like the increased fees, I'm sorry but it's TS. You use, you pay. I don't use, so I don't pay. Fair is fair. Speaking of fair, another smoker's tax was defeated because of a proposition back in 2008. This tax would have gone for childhood programs. Smokers only make up 25% of California's adult population. Why should 25% pay for programs that will benefit 75%, who pay nothing? Again, fair is fair.

Well, that's basically my stand on elections. It's all a ridiculous game that ZOG plays to make us think we have a say in who our leaders will be. There may be exceptions in local elections, but I take that on a case-by-case basis. The propositions are different. They give the people a direct say. Sure, if ZOG doesn't get their way through a proposition, they'll find another way. But if ZOG proposes a new tax or fee, are you going to not vote and open up your wallets if it does pass? ZOG will get their money one way or another, and sooner or later (better later than sooner). However, I work hard for my money. I'm not giving it up to ZOG or anyone else without a fight.

Alright comrades, let's make some comments on this one. Do you basically agree with me, or disagree?

BTW, I voted Marge Simpson for senator, Barney Gumble (the drunk on The Simpsons) for congress, and Peter Griffin for governor. Why not? At least Peter is a family guy! LOL

4 comments:

  1. Comrades, if we are not in a position to do the armed takeover route, then we have to go the election one. There is no other alternative than whining and complaining. I suggest that we treat NS election campaigns as we would a 'war', and go all-out for victory! Heil!

    ReplyDelete
  2. You make some sense, as does Dan when he talks of the propositions. But when all or most of the politicians are corrupt, what's the point?

    If there is an organization with 99 corrupt persons, and one honest one, how much can the honest person accomplish? Not much.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree that voting for candidates is a waste of time. I never really considered propositions. It's something to think about. If ZOG wants more tax money from us, I like the thought of making it as hard as possible for them to get it. If ZOG is going to take my money, at least we can make them work for it.

    Voting Homer Simpson for governor - that's funny!

    Dan, did you vote for a joke candidate for president in '08? If so, who?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sometimes its an effective strategy to vote for the WORSE possible candidate, in one of us isn't running, so as to put a totally non-Aryan face on the beast. So many stupid whites think that as long as a 'white man' is in charge, we're 'ok'. What a crock, these pale-faced traitors have done more than anything to put us in the present day position that we find ourselves in!

    ReplyDelete