Tuesday, February 1, 2011

A Year Without Spending — One Couple's Real-Life Saving Experiment

David Tsay

If you had peeked into my closet or taken a gander at my credit card statements a couple of years ago, you would have quickly figured out how I spent not only my money but also my time. I was consumed with the latest trendy items and loved to shop online; plastic was my ticket to fulfillment. I liked things, got a high from finding the perfect outfit, and could smell a great sale from miles away. When someone in my family wanted something new, whether we truly needed it or not, we simply bought it. I was happy, my husband, Jon, was happy, and our two daughters, Zoe, 9, and Avi, 6, were happy. Life was good.

Then one day, I woke up to the realization that shopping wasn't as enjoyable for me as it had once been. It was around New Year's Eve when I realized that something felt off. Maybe I was just shopped out after a December filled with consumption. We had spent a great deal of time, money, and energy shopping, and I found myself exhausted and disgusted with all the stuff. How many shoes does a girl need, anyway? In between rushing from after-school activities to the mall and then out to dinner, I began to feel that as a family, we were getting lost in superficial pursuits. I realized our spending habits were shaping our children's attitudes: The girls' conversations constantly revolved around the newest toys, and they assumed they'd get whatever they wanted. We weren't content just being together as a family. We were spending too much time thinking about what to buy, buying whatever it was we thought we needed, and not appreciating what we had just acquired. I found myself wondering, When is enough going to be enough?

My solution: a family shopping fast — so we could get back on track, reaffirm our goals, and make our daily habits reflect our priorities. It wouldn't be easy. I would have to convince my husband (a man who likes the latest gadgets just as much as I do), as well as our kids. I knew we'd need a structured plan to make such a drastic change, so I spent time coming up with specific rules. One night over dinner, I sprang the plan on my family: Avi cried, Zoe said it was a great idea, and Jon didn't really take me seriously. Nevertheless, I held on to my commitment to the operation and went over the rules:

RULE 1: Jon and I wouldn't purchase anything for one year. No clothing, shoes, adorable pocketbooks, or gadgets. Nada.

RULE 2: The girls would be allowed to get clothing only at the beginning of the school year or if they outgrew something they needed. New toys and games were off-limits.

RULE 3: All gifts would be in the form of books, gift cards, or homemade items.

RULE 4: Broken items would not be replaced.

RULE 5: Purchasing makeup was allowed. (A girl can only sacrifice so much!)

RULE 6: Any form of family entertainment was allowed — and encouraged.

Instead of growing our possessions, I wanted to grow my relationships. Instead of collecting things, I wanted to collect memories. And although we would be spending less, I wasn't focused on saving money — I wanted to save my family.

Only a couple of weeks into the project, Jon and I started noticing an increase in the amount of time we were spending together as a family as well as changes in the girls' behavior. They weren't asking for the stuff they saw on TV commercials anymore or coveting friends' new toys. Weekends weren't about going to the mall and scoring the latest "must-have" items. Instead, we enjoyed taking walks and cooking together. And my pick-up-sticks and Go Fish skills were put to the test.

When I found out about a sale going on at my favorite store, instead of dragging the kids there to watch me buy another pair of designer jeans, I stayed home and painted with my daughters. When Zoe outgrew her shoes and we bought her new ones, she thanked us with an appreciation that made me want to cry. Of course the girls still wanted to buy little things for themselves, but they asked for chores so they could earn their own money.

Items broke: the DVD player in my bedroom, the TV in the girls' playroom, the electronic picture frame in the kitchen that distracted me from the drudgery of doing dishes. Jon's suits had holes in the seams, and my running shoes were worn out. Our family motto became, "Use what you have and make it work," and we realized we almost always had everything we needed in some form. Jon even used an old shovel, rake, and flagpole as tomato stakes in our garden so that he didn't have to buy any. In the past we had just gone and bought new items instead of using substitutions, and we realized how wasteful we had been. Perfect timing, since the economy started tanking right in the middle of our shopping fast.

Abstaining from shopping changed more than just our monthly credit card statements. Not being consumed with the latest hip items allowed me time to think about what I really valued in my life, and I started making bigger changes. I realized there were many external distractions besides materialism that took time away from my family life. I reduced the clutter in our house, planned errands in batches to save time and gas, and said no to social engagements I didn't truly want to attend. And a family trip spent camping in the mountains of North Carolina, about two hours from our home, was about making memories, not buying mementoes.

There were trying moments during the year. I often longed to go to the store and buy new clothes. Jon and I argued when he broke the rules a couple of times. Occasionally, one of the kids would have a temper tantrum over something they "had" to have. It was in these moments, when my resolve weakened, that I hung on to my desired outcome. The thought that kept me going was, What would we be teaching our children if we didn't finish what we've started?

I'm proud to say we successfully completed our shopping fast. The one-year mark came and went, and we aren't bound by the rules anymore. But we've internalized the lessons and the benefits: Zoe will question the necessity of a potential purchase, both kids are more appreciative when they receive something, and we all prioritize and value our family time together above all else. I have a clear understanding that the way we lived our life before the shopping fast was excessive — and that the way we lived our life during the shopping fast was extreme. So we've found a healthy balance that works for our family. I still appreciate the joy of finding the perfect outfit, but it's nothing compared with the joy of playing basketball with Zoe, watching Avi learn to swim, and nurturing a true and meaningful connection with my family. And I'm confident we'll remain where we are — content with what we've got. The shopping fast made our family closer and happier. We have more padding in our bank accounts, and we've learned we're just as happy sleeping in a tent as we are in a fancy hotel. Life feels simpler and sweeter, and most important, my life is about the people I love, not the things I have. I hope one day my kids look back on this year and remember it with pride: the year we learned that the best things in life don't come with a price tag.

Comment:

At least when it comes to economics, this family lived a National Socialist lifestyle for a year - even if they didn't realise it - and their lives improved as a result.

Most Americans have become obsessed with filling their homes with basically useless crap made in slave-labour factories overseas. Most are in debt up to their ears because of it. And this is exactly what ZOG and the Judeo-Capitalists want. Why? Two main reasons: One, so they can make obscene profits. Two, so we will be so concerned about earning money to pay our debts, that we won't have time to make any trouble for them. We of the ANP who are struggling to break free of their economic chains are just the sort of "trouble" I'm referring to.

Anyway comrades, when it comes to buying all the newest stuff, my low economic level means I have to watch what I spend. However, with what money I do have, I divide everything into three categories: MUST HAVES (necessities like food, work cloths, legitimate business expenses, etc.), COULD USE (tools for work that I'd like, but don't use often enough to justify the expense, a NEW computer, washing machine, drier, etc. as opposed to good used ones), and WOULD BE NICE (luxuries, plain and simple). The latter I rarely buy, even when I can afford it. Now if someone gives me something like that as a Christmas or birthday gift, naturally I accept. Most of us would, right?

So the next time you go to blow your money, ask yourself this: Is what I'm going to buy a "must have", "could use", or "would be nice". You'll find that most of the time it's a "would be nice" that you can well do without.

6 comments:

  1. Really great article, and a really great experiment. One of the things National Socialism is about is the elimination of excess. Let's face it. Most Americans are greedy pigs. They want as much as they can get. Every useless little piece of crap that comes along they have to get - especially if it's new technology, and all made in China of course.

    That's a good idea about the three categories. Must have, could use, and would be nice. If we all think about it, most of the junk we have fits into the would be nice category. If everyone would just think before buying, the Judeo-Capitalists would make less, and we would save more.

    BTW, I was wondering. What's the purpose of filling in the box with the weird looking letters before we post? I mean, what's it for?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Luxuries are fine every now and again, but most Americans overdo it all the time. I think greed is instinctive. If it is, we all have to overcome it or we'll always be slaves to the Judeo-Capitalists.

    ReplyDelete
  3. -------------------------------------February 1, 2011 at 9:44 PM

    To 12:48 AM: I'm no expert mind you, but I believe that the box with the funny letters is to make certain that a person is commenting, and not an auto responder, also know as a 'Bot'. Bots are unable to read letters and numbers that are warped and out of whack.

    ReplyDelete
  4. If Party Comrades, put aside just one frivolous item that they really didn't NEED, each month, and instead sent those saved monies to the Party as support, they would be doing a great deed! Heck, a stupid and harmfull pack of smokes is over $5! How can we expect our organization to grow, if we don't properly fund it?

    ReplyDelete
  5. You said it 7:15 AM! One pack of ciggies is nearly $5. BTW, I smoke. Smoke just one less pack per month, that's five cigs a week, and you could donate that to the ANP. If you drink three or four beers a day, and you cut back just one a day, imagine how much more you'd have at the end of a month. How about brown bagging your lunch instead of going to McDonalds and eating their fatty poison every day? Skip going to the movies and wait for it to come out on DVD, then the entire family can watch it for the price of one rental fee, rather than several theater tickets. The list just goes on. It's so easy to save if we just think before we spend and realize just how much money we waste.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have a similar philosophy for such things.

    1.) Does this item/etc. magnify me (what I can do, extend my abilities, increase my productivity. etc.)?

    2.) Or does it subtract from me (Is this something that simply duplicates something I already have, drain my resources, etc.)?

    Dr. Johann Hauptmann

    ReplyDelete