Black on white crime must be confronted.

• June 27, 2011 10:31 am ET

Kyle Rogers

Recently, editors for the Los Angeles Times, the New York Times, and the Chicago Tribune have all publicly admitted to censoring black crime. They all said they justified it to protect blacks from being stigmatized. In his recent undercover videos, LA Lawyer Ben Shapiro recorded the creator of the TV show COPS stating the same thing.

All have decided that political correctness is more important than public safety. In recent days there has been a major online backlash against these policies. It is playing out on newspaper websites in the comment sections, on craigslist "rants," youtube comments, and facebook.

Many in South Carolina are particularly outraged over the treatment of the near fatal beating of Carter Strange in Columbia, SC. Carter Strange, 18, was jogging late at night near five points. A group of 8 black males aged 13-18 were out looking for a white person to attack.

They pounced on Strange and beat him almost to death. It wasn't until four days later that the story began receiving significant media attention in the Columbia area. The media and the Columbia Police have made no mention of "hate crime" or "lynching.”

The website for The State filled up with angry comments demanding that the newspaper call the attack a "hate crime." The State responded by deleting all the comments and disabling future comments on the story. There is a strong sense, that had the races been reversed, the media would be reporting it much more aggressively and using much stronger terms.

On Sunday, June 27th, the Peoria Chronicle reported a statement from the president of a neighborhood association about a rash of violence and disturbances from large groups of young black males. The incidents had been going on for weeks. He said the mobs target whites. In a recent incident, black teens were screaming, "Kill all whites" in his neighborhood.

The local Peoria FOX & NBC station interviewed residents who confirmed that violent mobs have been terrorizing the neighborhood. However, all mention of race was censored in the report.

After the Drudge Report posted a link to the Peoria Chronicle Sunday, thousands of posts and comments began appearing online. Many slammed the Peoria Journal Star, the city's daily paper, for never mentioning the mobs. Finally, the Peoria Journal Star broke their silence. The wrote an article calling the events "exaggerated" and attempted to smear the president of the Altoona Park neighborhood association.

However, the last two sentences in the Journal Star article seem to confirm that the story is true after all.

Rogers says the crowd was running wildly around yards and porches. It was the largest Rogers, 38, had ever seen in the neighborhood.

"They were doing a show of force," he said, "to show everybody, 'Hey, this is their hood.'"

Peoria, IL and Columbia, SC are not the only places where these events are occurring. Over the weekend, half a dozen whites were viciously assaulted by a mob of young blacks in Philadelphia. Police say the mob ranged from 50-100 people.

One woman had her leg broken. Two other were hospitalized with facial injuries. Yet the Philadelphia Inquire completely censored all mention of race in their article. No mention of “hates crimes” either.

No one has ever claimed that censoring information about crime makes the public safer. So why are major media bosses justifying all of this censorship? It is time to put public safety above political correctness and confront crime as it happens.

If media, police, and politicians do not openly and honestly confront the growing trend of brutal black on white crime things will only get much worse. It will also severely poison race relations in this country. Censorship is never justified when it puts the public in danger.

Continue reading on Examiner.com Black on white crime must be confronted. - Charleston Political Buzz | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-charleston-sc/black-on-white-crime-must-be-confronted#ixzz1QdN3ksvv

Comment:

Can you imagine the headlines if Mr. Strange (what a name!) were Black and his assailants were White! "Black Youth Lynched In South Carolina" "Hate Crimes On The Rise" "White Supremacy Rears Its Ugly Head Again", and so forth.

Because political correctness demands that the White man keep paying for offenses that were committed even before we were born, we're expected to just lie there and take it. WELL TO HELL WITH THAT, COMRADES! It's time we stopped apologising for being White. WE ARE THE VICTIMS NOW.

There are some that would say that this is payback. Payback for what? Payback for what our fathers, grandfathers, and great grandfathers may have done? I have no intention of being held responsible for any sins my ancestors may have committed. We owe a racial debt to no one. I say a debt dies with the man. If someone came to you and told you that your grandfather borrowed a thousand dollars from his grandfather and never paid it back, and as his grandson you owe him the money, your reaction most likely would be "Bite Me!" It's the same the when it comes to racial debts. OK, our ancestors kept Blacks as slaves. They did it, not us. Our fathers and grandfathers kept Blacks as second class citizens. They did it, not us. Besides, the Blacks committing these crimes against Whites were not the victims of this racial oppression and discrimination. They have no right to demand payback from people who did nothing wrong, especially when they themselves were not personally the victims of these "offenses".

Comrades, if you or someone you know becomes or has been a victim of Black on White violence, you must insist - no, DEMAND it be treated as a hate crime. If the authorities say no, don't give up. Keep harping on it. Don't give them a moments peace. Make as big a stink of it as you can. But remember, don't take the law into your own hands or YOU will be the one charged with a hate crime.

I think this is an issue that should be discussed in Laurens next month, and if no one else does, I'LL bring it up. Hopefully, we'll decide on an official ANP policy regarding this. If we do, it will be formally released after July 24th. Hail Victory!

Thanks again to Comrade Raymond Bxxxxxxx for sending this to me.

Dan 88!

Black on white crime must be confronted.

• June 27, 2011 10:31 am ET

Kyle Rogers

Recently, editors for the Los Angeles Times, the New York Times, and the Chicago Tribune have all publicly admitted to censoring black crime. They all said they justified it to protect blacks from being stigmatized. In his recent undercover videos, LA Lawyer Ben Shapiro recorded the creator of the TV show COPS stating the same thing.

All have decided that political correctness is more important than public safety. In recent days there has been a major online backlash against these policies. It is playing out on newspaper websites in the comment sections, on craigslist "rants," youtube comments, and facebook.

Many in South Carolina are particularly outraged over the treatment of the near fatal beating of Carter Strange in Columbia, SC. Carter Strange, 18, was jogging late at night near five points. A group of 8 black males aged 13-18 were out looking for a white person to attack.

They pounced on Strange and beat him almost to death. It wasn't until four days later that the story began receiving significant media attention in the Columbia area. The media and the Columbia Police have made no mention of "hate crime" or "lynching.”

The website for The State filled up with angry comments demanding that the newspaper call the attack a "hate crime." The State responded by deleting all the comments and disabling future comments on the story. There is a strong sense, that had the races been reversed, the media would be reporting it much more aggressively and using much stronger terms.

On Sunday, June 27th, the Peoria Chronicle reported a statement from the president of a neighborhood association about a rash of violence and disturbances from large groups of young black males. The incidents had been going on for weeks. He said the mobs target whites. In a recent incident, black teens were screaming, "Kill all whites" in his neighborhood.

The local Peoria FOX & NBC station interviewed residents who confirmed that violent mobs have been terrorizing the neighborhood. However, all mention of race was censored in the report.

After the Drudge Report posted a link to the Peoria Chronicle Sunday, thousands of posts and comments began appearing online. Many slammed the Peoria Journal Star, the city's daily paper, for never mentioning the mobs. Finally, the Peoria Journal Star broke their silence. The wrote an article calling the events "exaggerated" and attempted to smear the president of the Altoona Park neighborhood association.

However, the last two sentences in the Journal Star article seem to confirm that the story is true after all.

Rogers says the crowd was running wildly around yards and porches. It was the largest Rogers, 38, had ever seen in the neighborhood.

"They were doing a show of force," he said, "to show everybody, 'Hey, this is their hood.'"

Peoria, IL and Columbia, SC are not the only places where these events are occurring. Over the weekend, half a dozen whites were viciously assaulted by a mob of young blacks in Philadelphia. Police say the mob ranged from 50-100 people.

One woman had her leg broken. Two other were hospitalized with facial injuries. Yet the Philadelphia Inquire completely censored all mention of race in their article. No mention of “hates crimes” either.

No one has ever claimed that censoring information about crime makes the public safer. So why are major media bosses justifying all of this censorship? It is time to put public safety above political correctness and confront crime as it happens.

If media, police, and politicians do not openly and honestly confront the growing trend of brutal black on white crime things will only get much worse. It will also severely poison race relations in this country. Censorship is never justified when it puts the public in danger.

Continue reading on Examiner.com Black on white crime must be confronted. - Charleston Political Buzz | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-charleston-sc/black-on-white-crime-must-be-confronted#ixzz1QdN3ksvv

Comment:

Can you imagine the headlines if Mr. Strange (what a name!) were Black and his assailants were White! "Black Youth Lynched In South Carolina" "Hate Crimes On The Rise" "White Supremacy Rears Its Ugly Head Again", and so forth.

Because political correctness demands that the White man keep paying for offenses that were committed even before we were born, we're expected to just lie there and take it. WELL TO HELL WITH THAT, COMRADES! It's time we stopped apologising for being White. WE ARE THE VICTIMS NOW.

There are some that would say that this is payback. Payback for what? Payback for what our fathers, grandfathers, and great grandfathers may have done? I have no intention of being held responsible for any sins my ancestors may have committed. We owe a racial debt to no one. I say a debt dies with the man. If someone came to you and told you that your grandfather borrowed a thousand dollars from his grandfather and never paid it back, and as his grandson you owe him the money, your reaction most likely would be "Bite Me!" It's the same the when it comes to racial debts. OK, our ancestors kept Blacks as slaves. They did it, not us. Our fathers and grandfathers kept Blacks as second class citizens. They did it, not us. Besides, the Blacks committing these crimes against Whites were not the victims of this racial oppression and discrimination. They have no right to demand payback from people who did nothing wrong, especially when they themselves were not personally the victims of these "offenses".

Comrades, if you or someone you know becomes or has been a victim of Black on White violence, you must insist - no, DEMAND it be treated as a hate crime. If the authorities say no, don't give up. Keep harping on it. Don't give them a moments peace. Make as big a stink of it as you can. But remember, don't take the law into your own hands or YOU will be the one charged with a hate crime.

I think this is an issue that should be discussed in Laurens next month, and if no one else does, I'LL bring it up. Hopefully, we'll decide on an official ANP policy regarding this. If we do, it will be formally released after July 24th. Hail Victory!

Thanks again to Comrade Raymond Bxxxxxxx for sending this to me.

Dan 88!

Riots Break Out in Greece Over Bailout Funds

Updated: Tuesday, 28 Jun 2011, 9:44 PM CDT
Published : Tuesday, 28 Jun 2011, 11:43 AM CDT

By Darlene Hill, FOX Chicago News (with Associated Press contributing)

Hours of rioting outside Greece's parliament left 46 people injured Tuesday, on the eve of a vote by lawmakers to adopt more painful austerity measures -- a condition for bailout funds needed to prevent a potentially disastrous default.

At least 14 people were arrested, authorities said, as youths clashed with riot police on-and-off for more than 10 hours and into the night, leaving the city center filled with tear gas and strewn with smashed-up marble paving stones. Union had begun a 48-hour strike that shut down services and staged mass rallies through the capital in another day of chaotic protest.

James Alexander is a manager at a popular restaurant in Chicago’s Greektown and he says it's hard to watch video of the protesting and rioting going on in his native country of Greece.

Alexander has relatives in Greece. “We have friends. We have cousins, relatives, and we also have some property,” he said.

He says he's been calling and checking on his family every week since the parliament in Greece started telling residents it's time to buckle down. Taxes are going up and pensions may be gone.

Alexander says summer is the best time to visit Greece, but the rioters may scare tourists away.

He said: “You want to go, but the cabs are on strike, the airports are on strike, the metro’s on strike and the ships. You can't travel to the island, and even though they have a huge economic situation, this is going to bring their tourism down and that's the biggest industry."

Down the street on Halsted at Rodity's, Jim Kalas says his family purchased tickets to go to Greece next week and they're still taking that flight.

He says Greeks are calm and loving people and will work things out before the country or its citizens suffer anymore.

While Kalas is looking for updates on what's happening in Greece, he's frustrated because he has to check out the international news stations, when he says, the problems the Greeks are dealing with there are the same rights Americans are fighting for.

"Greece is the middle of the Balkans--or in Europe. The history and the democracy were founded there---so I think we should care about that country,” Kalas said.

Comment:

Comrades, one picture is worth a thousand words. What you see could happen here, and probably will if things continue to deteriorate - and we have every reason to believe that it will.

Judeo-Capitalism has virtually destroyed Greece. How long will it be before it's our turn? Years? Months? Judeo-Capitalism IS destroying this country. There's no question about it. The only question is exactly how long do we have?

National Socialism is the only chance this country has. If we can't stop the destruction of our country AND our Aryan Folk, then at least we must stand ready to pick up the pieces. If we don't, someone else surely will, and you know what that means. An American Zimbabwe where toilet paper is literally worth more than the dollar. Or worse - a new South Africa where Whites will be open prey. Sure, I know it's already happening in some places right here and now. I'll have a story on that tomorrow.

However, the violence is certainly not over for Greece. There are more controversial measures their Parliament is voting on. We'll have to wait and see what the Greek people's reaction will be to them, but I'm sure it will not be favourable.

BTW, to those of you who say Greeks aren't White, take a good look at those photographs. They sure look White to me.

Dan 88!

Riots Break Out in Greece Over Bailout Funds

Updated: Tuesday, 28 Jun 2011, 9:44 PM CDT
Published : Tuesday, 28 Jun 2011, 11:43 AM CDT

By Darlene Hill, FOX Chicago News (with Associated Press contributing)

Hours of rioting outside Greece's parliament left 46 people injured Tuesday, on the eve of a vote by lawmakers to adopt more painful austerity measures -- a condition for bailout funds needed to prevent a potentially disastrous default.

At least 14 people were arrested, authorities said, as youths clashed with riot police on-and-off for more than 10 hours and into the night, leaving the city center filled with tear gas and strewn with smashed-up marble paving stones. Union had begun a 48-hour strike that shut down services and staged mass rallies through the capital in another day of chaotic protest.

James Alexander is a manager at a popular restaurant in Chicago’s Greektown and he says it's hard to watch video of the protesting and rioting going on in his native country of Greece.

Alexander has relatives in Greece. “We have friends. We have cousins, relatives, and we also have some property,” he said.

He says he's been calling and checking on his family every week since the parliament in Greece started telling residents it's time to buckle down. Taxes are going up and pensions may be gone.

Alexander says summer is the best time to visit Greece, but the rioters may scare tourists away.

He said: “You want to go, but the cabs are on strike, the airports are on strike, the metro’s on strike and the ships. You can't travel to the island, and even though they have a huge economic situation, this is going to bring their tourism down and that's the biggest industry."

Down the street on Halsted at Rodity's, Jim Kalas says his family purchased tickets to go to Greece next week and they're still taking that flight.

He says Greeks are calm and loving people and will work things out before the country or its citizens suffer anymore.

While Kalas is looking for updates on what's happening in Greece, he's frustrated because he has to check out the international news stations, when he says, the problems the Greeks are dealing with there are the same rights Americans are fighting for.

"Greece is the middle of the Balkans--or in Europe. The history and the democracy were founded there---so I think we should care about that country,” Kalas said.

Comment:

Comrades, one picture is worth a thousand words. What you see could happen here, and probably will if things continue to deteriorate - and we have every reason to believe that it will.

Judeo-Capitalism has virtually destroyed Greece. How long will it be before it's our turn? Years? Months? Judeo-Capitalism IS destroying this country. There's no question about it. The only question is exactly how long do we have?

National Socialism is the only chance this country has. If we can't stop the destruction of our country AND our Aryan Folk, then at least we must stand ready to pick up the pieces. If we don't, someone else surely will, and you know what that means. An American Zimbabwe where toilet paper is literally worth more than the dollar. Or worse - a new South Africa where Whites will be open prey. Sure, I know it's already happening in some places right here and now. I'll have a story on that tomorrow.

However, the violence is certainly not over for Greece. There are more controversial measures their Parliament is voting on. We'll have to wait and see what the Greek people's reaction will be to them, but I'm sure it will not be favourable.

BTW, to those of you who say Greeks aren't White, take a good look at those photographs. They sure look White to me.

Dan 88!

The EU May Crumble Any Day Now

by Graham Summers

On Tuesday, Greece's parliament will vote on whether or not to implement more "austerity" measures, also known as cutting social programs and raising taxes. Greek citizens, enraged that they keep picking up the tab for banks (both domestic and international) that made poor bets on Greece, will be implementing a series of strikes and riots.

However, the facts remain the same. The world is awash in garbage debt. The only reason the banks and others haven't taken the "hit" that they NEED to take is because they've bought out the politicians. Put another way, we are seeing clearly that the two primary principles of the West (capitalism and democracy) have both become jokes: alleged "capitalists" like the banks don't ever actually see losses for mistakes and "democratically elected" leaders are in fact owned outright by the banks via donations/ bribes.

Greece, while ultimately a small player in the global debt game, will set the course of the rest of the financial world this week. If Greece implements more austerity measures, that the "extend and pretend" game will continue a little longer, the Euro, stocks and commodities will rise, and the US Dollar will fall.

However, if Greece doesn't pass more austerity measures, indicating that the bailout/ stimulus nonsense has hit a wall, expect a serious "risk off" move in which stocks, commodities, and the Euro to take a hit, and investors rush into the US Dollar.

However, this will not be a simple one-way street. The EU, and now China are both committed to helping the failed experiment of the Euro continue its death march.

Yes, you read that correctly, China has committed to insuring that Eurozone debt holders don't take a haircut. It's even mentioned possibly buying European sovereign bonds outright.

The reasons for this a multiple... but ultimately they boil down to:

1) China wants to flex its "dump the Dollar" political muscles

2) China wants to support its primary export market.

China's been warning about the US Dollar as an investment for years. They've lowered their Treasury holdings for five months straight and have even hinted they might cut their holdings by 2/3. So China's move to support the Euro can be seen as a continuation of this "anti-Dollar trend."

Regarding exports, the EU accounts for roughly $400 billion of China's exports, making it China's single largest export market. So if Europe collapses, China's economy takes a BIG hit.

Comment

Check the news tomorrow. Internet news is your best bet. There may be massive rioting in Greece Tuesday or Wednesday, depending on when the Greek Parliament releases the news of how they intend to proceed, and the mainstream Jews Media may try and play it down, because it is a glimpse of what may becoming to the United States in a year or two - perhaps even this year.

Europe is crumbling. If it does, it may take China with it. I'm all broken up about that. We may have to do without some of that plastic crap Americans love so much.

I'm going to withhold any further comments until I see what happens. Remember, I'm writing this late Monday evening, so I won't know until tomorrow.

BTW, maybe the ANP should contact Mr. Summers. He sure is starting to talk like one of us. Judeo-Capitalist turned National Socialist. Now that would be good propaganda if he did!

As to the possible EU breakup.... "Ha! Ha!" - Nelson Muntz, The Simpsons.

Dan 88!

The EU May Crumble Any Day Now

by Graham Summers

On Tuesday, Greece's parliament will vote on whether or not to implement more "austerity" measures, also known as cutting social programs and raising taxes. Greek citizens, enraged that they keep picking up the tab for banks (both domestic and international) that made poor bets on Greece, will be implementing a series of strikes and riots.

However, the facts remain the same. The world is awash in garbage debt. The only reason the banks and others haven't taken the "hit" that they NEED to take is because they've bought out the politicians. Put another way, we are seeing clearly that the two primary principles of the West (capitalism and democracy) have both become jokes: alleged "capitalists" like the banks don't ever actually see losses for mistakes and "democratically elected" leaders are in fact owned outright by the banks via donations/ bribes.

Greece, while ultimately a small player in the global debt game, will set the course of the rest of the financial world this week. If Greece implements more austerity measures, that the "extend and pretend" game will continue a little longer, the Euro, stocks and commodities will rise, and the US Dollar will fall.

However, if Greece doesn't pass more austerity measures, indicating that the bailout/ stimulus nonsense has hit a wall, expect a serious "risk off" move in which stocks, commodities, and the Euro to take a hit, and investors rush into the US Dollar.

However, this will not be a simple one-way street. The EU, and now China are both committed to helping the failed experiment of the Euro continue its death march.

Yes, you read that correctly, China has committed to insuring that Eurozone debt holders don't take a haircut. It's even mentioned possibly buying European sovereign bonds outright.

The reasons for this a multiple... but ultimately they boil down to:

1) China wants to flex its "dump the Dollar" political muscles

2) China wants to support its primary export market.

China's been warning about the US Dollar as an investment for years. They've lowered their Treasury holdings for five months straight and have even hinted they might cut their holdings by 2/3. So China's move to support the Euro can be seen as a continuation of this "anti-Dollar trend."

Regarding exports, the EU accounts for roughly $400 billion of China's exports, making it China's single largest export market. So if Europe collapses, China's economy takes a BIG hit.

Comment

Check the news tomorrow. Internet news is your best bet. There may be massive rioting in Greece Tuesday or Wednesday, depending on when the Greek Parliament releases the news of how they intend to proceed, and the mainstream Jews Media may try and play it down, because it is a glimpse of what may becoming to the United States in a year or two - perhaps even this year.

Europe is crumbling. If it does, it may take China with it. I'm all broken up about that. We may have to do without some of that plastic crap Americans love so much.

I'm going to withhold any further comments until I see what happens. Remember, I'm writing this late Monday evening, so I won't know until tomorrow.

BTW, maybe the ANP should contact Mr. Summers. He sure is starting to talk like one of us. Judeo-Capitalist turned National Socialist. Now that would be good propaganda if he did!

As to the possible EU breakup.... "Ha! Ha!" - Nelson Muntz, The Simpsons.

Dan 88!

My Reaction To The Chairman's April 24 ANP Report

I'm sure most of you have read Chairman Suhayda's remarks in the June 24 ANP Report.

First of all, whether you agree with him or not, it took a lot of guts to take such a stand on such a controversial subject. I applaud him for it. I also agree with him.

Now if you've been over to White Reference (www.whitereference.blogspot.com), you'd think that the Chairman's statements herald the beginning of the Apocalypse. I have never heard such whining and bitching as I read from some of the commentors there.

I'm glad to say that Anchorage Activist, the blog's administrator supported the Chairman's position for the most part and gave him good PR. Indeed, many commentors also came out in support of our Chairman, but many did not.

If you haven't read the post yet, jump over there right now and do so before you read any more here. Make certain you read the comments as well.

Not surprisingly, those who did not support the Chairman were primarily the type of people whose debating style is a little, um, shall we say crude. These are the type of people that can only express their disagreement with someone through the use of insults, name-calling, bullshit stories, out and out lies, and general idiocy. They tell BS stories in an attempt to destroy the credibility of those they disagree with, when in reality, they're only demonstrating their own shortcomings in that area.

Anyone who can't make their point without insults and obscenities obviously is a person of limited intelligence.

After reading the Chairman's Report, I cannot find a single word that indicates acceptance, nay even tolerance of homosexuality. What I find is that it's more like he's resigned to the fact that it is impossible to eradicate it, and so we must learn to make the best of it. Homosexuality must be put back in the closet like it was "back in the day." Besides, what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their own homes is their business as long as it does no one any harm. Even if I disagreed with that, what could we do about it? Start a special SS unit and call it the "Bedroom Police"? Ridiculous, impractical, impossible.

Also, let us bear in mind that 21st Century America, is NOT 1930's Germany, nor even the entire continent of Europe, for that matter. Even amongst just the White population of the United States, we are of mixed nationalities. English, German, Irish, Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, French, et al. All have slightly different traditions, cultures, and beliefs, unlike Germany who were basically one people.

Add to the fact that before the failed Wiemar Republic, Germany was an empire. Remember, Kaiser is German for emperor. The German people were used to the idea of being ruled by one man. Most Americans find this prospect to be unacceptable. When devising a National Socialism for 21st Century America, all these factors have to be taken into account. Bearing this in mind, we cannot follow the Fuhrer's teachings to the letter. We must adapt to the time and place where we now exist, and not try and recreate a bygone era that will never come again. We must create a new, American Reich, not recreate the old German one. The ANP looks to the future, and not the past. Hail Victory!

Dan 88!

My Reaction To The Chairman's April 24 ANP Report

I'm sure most of you have read Chairman Suhayda's remarks in the June 24 ANP Report.

First of all, whether you agree with him or not, it took a lot of guts to take such a stand on such a controversial subject. I applaud him for it. I also agree with him.

Now if you've been over to White Reference (www.whitereference.blogspot.com), you'd think that the Chairman's statements herald the beginning of the Apocalypse. I have never heard such whining and bitching as I read from some of the commentors there.

I'm glad to say that Anchorage Activist, the blog's administrator supported the Chairman's position for the most part and gave him good PR. Indeed, many commentors also came out in support of our Chairman, but many did not.

If you haven't read the post yet, jump over there right now and do so before you read any more here. Make certain you read the comments as well.

Not surprisingly, those who did not support the Chairman were primarily the type of people whose debating style is a little, um, shall we say crude. These are the type of people that can only express their disagreement with someone through the use of insults, name-calling, bullshit stories, out and out lies, and general idiocy. They tell BS stories in an attempt to destroy the credibility of those they disagree with, when in reality, they're only demonstrating their own shortcomings in that area.

Anyone who can't make their point without insults and obscenities obviously is a person of limited intelligence.

After reading the Chairman's Report, I cannot find a single word that indicates acceptance, nay even tolerance of homosexuality. What I find is that it's more like he's resigned to the fact that it is impossible to eradicate it, and so we must learn to make the best of it. Homosexuality must be put back in the closet like it was "back in the day." Besides, what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their own homes is their business as long as it does no one any harm. Even if I disagreed with that, what could we do about it? Start a special SS unit and call it the "Bedroom Police"? Ridiculous, impractical, impossible.

Also, let us bear in mind that 21st Century America, is NOT 1930's Germany, nor even the entire continent of Europe, for that matter. Even amongst just the White population of the United States, we are of mixed nationalities. English, German, Irish, Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, French, et al. All have slightly different traditions, cultures, and beliefs, unlike Germany who were basically one people.

Add to the fact that before the failed Wiemar Republic, Germany was an empire. Remember, Kaiser is German for emperor. The German people were used to the idea of being ruled by one man. Most Americans find this prospect to be unacceptable. When devising a National Socialism for 21st Century America, all these factors have to be taken into account. Bearing this in mind, we cannot follow the Fuhrer's teachings to the letter. We must adapt to the time and place where we now exist, and not try and recreate a bygone era that will never come again. We must create a new, American Reich, not recreate the old German one. The ANP looks to the future, and not the past. Hail Victory!

Dan 88!

Why Gas Prices Should Be Lower Soon

Daniel Gross is economics editor at Yahoo! Finance.

Daniel Gross, On Thursday June 23, 2011, 2:21 pm EDT

Oil markets were roiled today when the United States and the International Energy Agency jointly announced that they would release a combined 60 million barrels of oil into international markets over the coming month.

The U.S. said it well sell 30 million barrels from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, while other countries that are members of the International Energy Administration will provide the rest from their reserves.

But didn't President Obama tell you just a couple of weeks ago that he wasn't planning to do this?

Indeed he did. At a meeting with finance journalists on June 8, I specifically asked whether he was considering releasing oil from the SPR. His response:

"I won't make any news on that today. I will say that my general view is that the SPR is to be used where you don't have just short-term fluctuations in the market, but a significant disruption event. Libya has taken 1.25 m barrels per day off the market. We're examining broadly what that means in terms of the oil market."

So what's changed in the past two weeks?

A couple of things. First, the administration has apparently concluded that the situation in Libya isn't going to improve in the short term. As Energy Secretary Steven Chu put it today: "We are taking this action in response to the ongoing loss of crude oil due to supply disruptions in Libya and other countries, and their impact on the global economic recovery," said Energy Secretary Steven Chu. While Libya accounts for only a tiny portion of global oil production, its oil is the most cherished (and easy to process) light, sweet crude.

Second, an OPEC meeting two weeks ago ended in disarray, with members disagreeing about higher production. That suggests that the production we're losing from Libya won't be replaced anytime soon.

But why release the oil now? After all, oil prices have been falling since May.

It's true that oil prices have been falling. Since peaking at $114 per barrel in May, oil prices had fallen about 16.7 percent before today's announcement. (For a longer term chart, go here) Meanwhile, gasoline prices have fallen in the last two weeks, from a nationwide average of $3.78 per gallon to $3.65 per gallon. But that's still up 91 cents per gallon from a year ago, and the peak summer driving season is about to begin. Simply put, higher gas prices hurt the economy more in the summer than they do in the spring.

Cynics would say that politics are also coming into play.

As I discuss with my colleagues Aaron Task and Jeff Macke in the accompanying video, you don't have to be cynical to think that. While the economy is slowing, there seems to be little hope of further aid or stimulus. In his press conference yesterday, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke indicated that the central bank was pretty much done with its efforts to boost demand. On Capitol Hill, talks are centering on anti-stimulative spending cuts and tax increases. And so releasing oil from the SPR is one way President Obama can stimulate the economy without action from the Fed or Congress. In theory, greater supplies of oil bring down the price. And cheaper oil functions as a tax cut for businesses and consumers.

Will gas prices come down as a result?

Yes. Crude oil prices have fallen more than 20 percent from their May peak. But don't expect a sharp decline in the price at the pump in the next few weeks. Gasoline station owners buy new supplies every couple of days. So when their costs rise, they feel compelled to pass along the higher prices to consumers instantly — as a matter of survival. The opposite dynamic takes hold when oil prices are falling. As wholesale gas falls in price, profit margins expand, and station owners are in no rush to ratchet down the price at the pump.

Of course, in the scheme of things, 60 million barrels isn't much. In 2010, the U.S. consumed about 19.15 million barrels per day, and the world ran through about 85.3 million barrels per day. Put another way, this 60 million barrels is about what the U.S. consumes in three days, or what the world consumes in 17 hours.

Even though it's a small amount, it seemed to have a big market impact. Why?

Right after the announcement, the price of oil fell about five percent, to below $90 per barrel.That's a pretty dramatic move. And it can be explained by a few factors. This represents new supply and takes away some of the worries about disruptions. In addition, speculation has played a role in keeping oil prices high. And some investors and analysts believe that this may be part of a concerted effort to fight speculators. The 30 million barrels the U.S. is releasing is equal to 4.2 percent of the total in the SPR, so there could be more to come. In addition, other economic news — the Fed ratcheting down its projection for economic growth in the second half of 2011 yesterday, and general concerns about a slowdown in China — point to lower prices.

Is this unprecedented?

No. When there are disruptions — a barge accident, a refinery explosion — the SPR lends out small amounts of oil to refineries, as it did in 2006. After Hurricane Katrina in the fall of 2005, the SPR offered to sell up to 30 million barrels to help keep the industry supplied. Ultimately, 11 million barrels were sold.

Will this move alone bring oil prices back to earth?

All things being equal, additional supply should lead to lower prices. But in the oil market, all things are never equal. The strength of the dollar, the pace of growth in China, politics in Iran, instability in the Middle East, new finds, OPEC decisions and more play into the ultimate price of oil.

Comment:

What it all boils down to comrades is greed. The Judeo-Capitalists care little for the working class, and even less for the White Working Class. All these heartless, money/power hungry pigs care about is feathering their own nests.

But who's actually to blame for high prices? Well yeah, us for one, for tolerating it so long. But not counting ourselves, it's a combination of the oil companies, the oil producing nations, and the oil brokers who are the middle men between them. The brokers are more responsible than anyone else. These are wealthy speculators who buy up entire tankers and sit on them until an oil company agrees to their high price. Naturally, the oil companies pass on the cost to us.

But it is also true that all three are in cahoots with each other to keep the prices high. As a result, all three make OBSCENE amounts of profit. The only ones who make higher profits are credit card banks.

What could a National Socialist state do about this? For one thing, the United States has enough crude oil in places like Texas, California, Alaska, and a few other states to supply ALL our petroleum needs. We don't need one drop of foreign oil. So why do we buy it? Obviously, so the elite can make better profits, but also because Middle Eastern oil is lower sulfur than ours, so there are fewer emissions during the refining process. Also, extracting enough oil on American soil to supply our needs would damage the environment even more.

Under a National Socialist state, we could indeed use our own oil supply, as long as profits were not the number one motivation. Science does have the technology to make the refinement process even more efficient, so there would be fewer emissions during refinement. There's a problem. The newer equipment would cost more money to buy, install and operate, thereby cutting into big oil's profits. As to damaging the environment, again, with greater precautions and superior safety equipment, we could go easier on the environment than we do today. But there's that pesky problem of that eating into corporate profits. Under a National Socialist government, the BP oil disaster in the Gulf NEVER would have happened.

As long as profit is the only motive, as long as people place the value of money over that of people (and the environment), nothing will ever improve.

"Most men achieve their wealth and power by standing on the backs of the poor." - Mark Twain.

Dan 88!

Why Gas Prices Should Be Lower Soon

Daniel Gross is economics editor at Yahoo! Finance.

Daniel Gross, On Thursday June 23, 2011, 2:21 pm EDT

Oil markets were roiled today when the United States and the International Energy Agency jointly announced that they would release a combined 60 million barrels of oil into international markets over the coming month.

The U.S. said it well sell 30 million barrels from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, while other countries that are members of the International Energy Administration will provide the rest from their reserves.

But didn't President Obama tell you just a couple of weeks ago that he wasn't planning to do this?

Indeed he did. At a meeting with finance journalists on June 8, I specifically asked whether he was considering releasing oil from the SPR. His response:

"I won't make any news on that today. I will say that my general view is that the SPR is to be used where you don't have just short-term fluctuations in the market, but a significant disruption event. Libya has taken 1.25 m barrels per day off the market. We're examining broadly what that means in terms of the oil market."

So what's changed in the past two weeks?

A couple of things. First, the administration has apparently concluded that the situation in Libya isn't going to improve in the short term. As Energy Secretary Steven Chu put it today: "We are taking this action in response to the ongoing loss of crude oil due to supply disruptions in Libya and other countries, and their impact on the global economic recovery," said Energy Secretary Steven Chu. While Libya accounts for only a tiny portion of global oil production, its oil is the most cherished (and easy to process) light, sweet crude.

Second, an OPEC meeting two weeks ago ended in disarray, with members disagreeing about higher production. That suggests that the production we're losing from Libya won't be replaced anytime soon.

But why release the oil now? After all, oil prices have been falling since May.

It's true that oil prices have been falling. Since peaking at $114 per barrel in May, oil prices had fallen about 16.7 percent before today's announcement. (For a longer term chart, go here) Meanwhile, gasoline prices have fallen in the last two weeks, from a nationwide average of $3.78 per gallon to $3.65 per gallon. But that's still up 91 cents per gallon from a year ago, and the peak summer driving season is about to begin. Simply put, higher gas prices hurt the economy more in the summer than they do in the spring.

Cynics would say that politics are also coming into play.

As I discuss with my colleagues Aaron Task and Jeff Macke in the accompanying video, you don't have to be cynical to think that. While the economy is slowing, there seems to be little hope of further aid or stimulus. In his press conference yesterday, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke indicated that the central bank was pretty much done with its efforts to boost demand. On Capitol Hill, talks are centering on anti-stimulative spending cuts and tax increases. And so releasing oil from the SPR is one way President Obama can stimulate the economy without action from the Fed or Congress. In theory, greater supplies of oil bring down the price. And cheaper oil functions as a tax cut for businesses and consumers.

Will gas prices come down as a result?

Yes. Crude oil prices have fallen more than 20 percent from their May peak. But don't expect a sharp decline in the price at the pump in the next few weeks. Gasoline station owners buy new supplies every couple of days. So when their costs rise, they feel compelled to pass along the higher prices to consumers instantly — as a matter of survival. The opposite dynamic takes hold when oil prices are falling. As wholesale gas falls in price, profit margins expand, and station owners are in no rush to ratchet down the price at the pump.

Of course, in the scheme of things, 60 million barrels isn't much. In 2010, the U.S. consumed about 19.15 million barrels per day, and the world ran through about 85.3 million barrels per day. Put another way, this 60 million barrels is about what the U.S. consumes in three days, or what the world consumes in 17 hours.

Even though it's a small amount, it seemed to have a big market impact. Why?

Right after the announcement, the price of oil fell about five percent, to below $90 per barrel.That's a pretty dramatic move. And it can be explained by a few factors. This represents new supply and takes away some of the worries about disruptions. In addition, speculation has played a role in keeping oil prices high. And some investors and analysts believe that this may be part of a concerted effort to fight speculators. The 30 million barrels the U.S. is releasing is equal to 4.2 percent of the total in the SPR, so there could be more to come. In addition, other economic news — the Fed ratcheting down its projection for economic growth in the second half of 2011 yesterday, and general concerns about a slowdown in China — point to lower prices.

Is this unprecedented?

No. When there are disruptions — a barge accident, a refinery explosion — the SPR lends out small amounts of oil to refineries, as it did in 2006. After Hurricane Katrina in the fall of 2005, the SPR offered to sell up to 30 million barrels to help keep the industry supplied. Ultimately, 11 million barrels were sold.

Will this move alone bring oil prices back to earth?

All things being equal, additional supply should lead to lower prices. But in the oil market, all things are never equal. The strength of the dollar, the pace of growth in China, politics in Iran, instability in the Middle East, new finds, OPEC decisions and more play into the ultimate price of oil.

Comment:

What it all boils down to comrades is greed. The Judeo-Capitalists care little for the working class, and even less for the White Working Class. All these heartless, money/power hungry pigs care about is feathering their own nests.

But who's actually to blame for high prices? Well yeah, us for one, for tolerating it so long. But not counting ourselves, it's a combination of the oil companies, the oil producing nations, and the oil brokers who are the middle men between them. The brokers are more responsible than anyone else. These are wealthy speculators who buy up entire tankers and sit on them until an oil company agrees to their high price. Naturally, the oil companies pass on the cost to us.

But it is also true that all three are in cahoots with each other to keep the prices high. As a result, all three make OBSCENE amounts of profit. The only ones who make higher profits are credit card banks.

What could a National Socialist state do about this? For one thing, the United States has enough crude oil in places like Texas, California, Alaska, and a few other states to supply ALL our petroleum needs. We don't need one drop of foreign oil. So why do we buy it? Obviously, so the elite can make better profits, but also because Middle Eastern oil is lower sulfur than ours, so there are fewer emissions during the refining process. Also, extracting enough oil on American soil to supply our needs would damage the environment even more.

Under a National Socialist state, we could indeed use our own oil supply, as long as profits were not the number one motivation. Science does have the technology to make the refinement process even more efficient, so there would be fewer emissions during refinement. There's a problem. The newer equipment would cost more money to buy, install and operate, thereby cutting into big oil's profits. As to damaging the environment, again, with greater precautions and superior safety equipment, we could go easier on the environment than we do today. But there's that pesky problem of that eating into corporate profits. Under a National Socialist government, the BP oil disaster in the Gulf NEVER would have happened.

As long as profit is the only motive, as long as people place the value of money over that of people (and the environment), nothing will ever improve.

"Most men achieve their wealth and power by standing on the backs of the poor." - Mark Twain.

Dan 88!

Has This Ever Happened To You?

Today, I'm making a big departure from the typical National Socialist topics to discuss a big problem on the internet today: Hacking. This is of grave concern to all - including, or perhaps ESPECIALLY National Socialists.

Now bear in mind it's Friday evening as I write this.

Yesterday, I came home from work at the usual time. The first thing I do is turn on my computer and check my email, both personal, and ANP. Usually, I do my personal email first, which is what I did that Thursday. I get online, open my email, and my mouth drops open. I have over 500 emails! Almost all were from Mailer-Daemon, telling me that the email I sent was undeliverable. Here's the thing. I didn't send them. So I open a few, and the addresses they were sent to were unknown to me. They came with attachments which contain the original text. However, since hackers put viruses and worms in attachments, I wouldn't open them, so I have no idea what the message was.

So I deleted them all. That's over with, right? WRONG! Shortly after, about 100 more pour in. Same story. I deleted them again. I'm thinking, "WTF?!"

So I keep an eye on my email. About every hour or so, a new batch of 100 or so of these Mailer-Daemon notices comes in. Then it hit me what's going on. Some turd hacked into my email account, and is using it to spam people. That could get ME in trouble. Plus if he was a con artist and scamming people, I could get the blame.

First, I changed my email password. They still kept flooding in. Next, I email my email provider and report what's happening. I figured at least I can get this on the record that it's happening and I'm not to blame.

About four hours later, I get an email from my provider. They said they have looked into the matter and are satisfied that I'm not to blame. They said they would change the settings or something from their end, and all I had to do was change my password again, and it should stop.
Thank God it did. All was normal again.

What happened was some internet conman hacked my account, and was sending out regularly scheduled emails using a list he had, and an autoresponder. Evidently, some of the addresses he had were no longer any good, but he had no way of knowing that because the failure notices were coming to me, so every time he sent out a batch of spam, I got more failure notices.

I contacted a few ANP comrades and both Chairman Suhayda and Axl Hess said that had happened to them as well.

If this should happen to any of you, here's what you do. DON'T change your password - yet. Chances are it's too late for that if the hacker is any good. Instead, report it immediately to your email provider whether it's Yahoo, Hotmail, Gmail, or a private provider like AOL. When they get back to you, they'll give you instructions what to do. THEN DO IT IMMEDIATELY!

It's not just a matter of stopping nuisance failure notices for email you never sent. You do not want to be blamed for any spamming, which could get your account suspended. Plus, if the hacker is a conman, you certainly don't want to be blamed for any internet bunko scheme. Sure, you can prove your innocence. But that could be quite a lot of bother and give you an enormous series of headaches and aggravations. It's best to report something like this at once, and follow their instructions to the letter.

I had one day of headaches. How many would I have had if I hadn't reported this the same day? I'd hate to have to find out the hard way!

BTW, here's a big headache for you. Only six months more to Christmas! Where does the time go?

Dan 88!

Has This Ever Happened To You?

Today, I'm making a big departure from the typical National Socialist topics to discuss a big problem on the internet today: Hacking. This is of grave concern to all - including, or perhaps ESPECIALLY National Socialists.

Now bear in mind it's Friday evening as I write this.

Yesterday, I came home from work at the usual time. The first thing I do is turn on my computer and check my email, both personal, and ANP. Usually, I do my personal email first, which is what I did that Thursday. I get online, open my email, and my mouth drops open. I have over 500 emails! Almost all were from Mailer-Daemon, telling me that the email I sent was undeliverable. Here's the thing. I didn't send them. So I open a few, and the addresses they were sent to were unknown to me. They came with attachments which contain the original text. However, since hackers put viruses and worms in attachments, I wouldn't open them, so I have no idea what the message was.

So I deleted them all. That's over with, right? WRONG! Shortly after, about 100 more pour in. Same story. I deleted them again. I'm thinking, "WTF?!"

So I keep an eye on my email. About every hour or so, a new batch of 100 or so of these Mailer-Daemon notices comes in. Then it hit me what's going on. Some turd hacked into my email account, and is using it to spam people. That could get ME in trouble. Plus if he was a con artist and scamming people, I could get the blame.

First, I changed my email password. They still kept flooding in. Next, I email my email provider and report what's happening. I figured at least I can get this on the record that it's happening and I'm not to blame.

About four hours later, I get an email from my provider. They said they have looked into the matter and are satisfied that I'm not to blame. They said they would change the settings or something from their end, and all I had to do was change my password again, and it should stop.
Thank God it did. All was normal again.

What happened was some internet conman hacked my account, and was sending out regularly scheduled emails using a list he had, and an autoresponder. Evidently, some of the addresses he had were no longer any good, but he had no way of knowing that because the failure notices were coming to me, so every time he sent out a batch of spam, I got more failure notices.

I contacted a few ANP comrades and both Chairman Suhayda and Axl Hess said that had happened to them as well.

If this should happen to any of you, here's what you do. DON'T change your password - yet. Chances are it's too late for that if the hacker is any good. Instead, report it immediately to your email provider whether it's Yahoo, Hotmail, Gmail, or a private provider like AOL. When they get back to you, they'll give you instructions what to do. THEN DO IT IMMEDIATELY!

It's not just a matter of stopping nuisance failure notices for email you never sent. You do not want to be blamed for any spamming, which could get your account suspended. Plus, if the hacker is a conman, you certainly don't want to be blamed for any internet bunko scheme. Sure, you can prove your innocence. But that could be quite a lot of bother and give you an enormous series of headaches and aggravations. It's best to report something like this at once, and follow their instructions to the letter.

I had one day of headaches. How many would I have had if I hadn't reported this the same day? I'd hate to have to find out the hard way!

BTW, here's a big headache for you. Only six months more to Christmas! Where does the time go?

Dan 88!

Announcements

I have just one announcement today. I truly regret having to do this, but we have an NSM turd coming on here and making inappropriate comments. I've had to make some changes to the comments feature. Anyone can still comment, and it can be anonymously, but each comment will have to have my approval before it is published.

I was hoping it wouldn't have to come to this. However, many National Socialist blogs, including Comrade JT Bowles's blog do the comments in this fashion, so my changing my policy isn't really out of the ordinary.

Now that isn't the case on White Reference. All comments are immediately published. Now I am not criticizing Anchorage Activist for his policy. It's his blog and he can run it the way he chooses. However, just look at what goes on there. True, WR has a lot more traffic than S & S, but look at the type of people that comment. They argue back and forth, they insult each other, and they take cheap shots at anyone who disagrees with them.

I'm sure Anchorage Activist has his reasons for allowing that sort of behaviour, and it is his business, but I won't allow that sort of thing here. I make the rules here as I see fit, and I don't have to explain my blog policies to anyone.

Whether they are directed at me, or anyone else here, I hate insults, cheap shots, snide remarks, and childish arguing. I like to see a good debate going on a relevant issue, but I hate it when supposedly grown adults argue, name call, and tell unsubstantiated stories about other National Socialists.

But do you know who loves that sort of thing? The Jews Media, and our other adversaries. They just lap that stuff up because it makes us look the way they want us to look to the general public: Like a bunch of childish kooks with absolutely no credibility.

Once again, I apologise for having to tighten up restrictions because of a few immature idiots who seemingly have nothing better to do than tear other people down. I just thought I owed my responsible followers and readers an explanation. Thank you for your understanding.

Dan 88!

Announcements

I have just one announcement today. I truly regret having to do this, but we have an NSM turd coming on here and making inappropriate comments. I've had to make some changes to the comments feature. Anyone can still comment, and it can be anonymously, but each comment will have to have my approval before it is published.

I was hoping it wouldn't have to come to this. However, many National Socialist blogs, including Comrade JT Bowles's blog do the comments in this fashion, so my changing my policy isn't really out of the ordinary.

Now that isn't the case on White Reference. All comments are immediately published. Now I am not criticizing Anchorage Activist for his policy. It's his blog and he can run it the way he chooses. However, just look at what goes on there. True, WR has a lot more traffic than S & S, but look at the type of people that comment. They argue back and forth, they insult each other, and they take cheap shots at anyone who disagrees with them.

I'm sure Anchorage Activist has his reasons for allowing that sort of behaviour, and it is his business, but I won't allow that sort of thing here. I make the rules here as I see fit, and I don't have to explain my blog policies to anyone.

Whether they are directed at me, or anyone else here, I hate insults, cheap shots, snide remarks, and childish arguing. I like to see a good debate going on a relevant issue, but I hate it when supposedly grown adults argue, name call, and tell unsubstantiated stories about other National Socialists.

But do you know who loves that sort of thing? The Jews Media, and our other adversaries. They just lap that stuff up because it makes us look the way they want us to look to the general public: Like a bunch of childish kooks with absolutely no credibility.

Once again, I apologise for having to tighten up restrictions because of a few immature idiots who seemingly have nothing better to do than tear other people down. I just thought I owed my responsible followers and readers an explanation. Thank you for your understanding.

Dan 88!

Are You Ready For 3rd World America?

The US economy is literally on the ledge of a cliff.

Today, the Federal Government accounts for 35% of incomes and salaries in the US. That's over one third of all income in the US coming from the Government's ability to dole out funds.

What supports this largesse?

Money printing and our ongoing debt-orgy. And today, these are one and the same. The US Federal Reserve and Treasury have enacted policies so insane that the US Federal Reserve is now the single largest holder of US Debt with a balance sheet of $2.8 trillion.

Let's give that number some perspective. Germany, the world's FOURTH largest economy is only $3.3 trillion in size. At $2.8 trillion the Fed's balance sheet is larger than the economies of France, the UK, and Brazil.

Why is the Fed's balance sheet so huge? Because US Treasuries are so unattractive to foreign Governments that the Fed has had to pick up the slack and buy our debt (usually within a week or two of it being issued).

Let me rephrase that: the US Fed is now printing money so it can buy US Debt because other investors are no longer interested in buying it.

This is just one of the various schemes Washington is employing to maintain its fiscal insanity. Another is the active raiding of pension funds to buy new US Debt (YES, the Treasury is doing this).

So... the US Government is now paying over 1/3rd of US incomes... and it's financing this by having the Fed buy new debt from the Treasury.

Do you think this entire system might end up collapsing in a horrific manner?

And this is just ONE ASPECT of the nightmare that is the US Financial system. I'm not even detailing the $600 TRILLION in derivatives, the clear insolvency of the big banks (you know who I'm talking about), the FDIC running a deficit (are our deposits REALLY insured?), erupting inflation in food and energy prices, (Fed data CLAIMS prices FELL in the last four months) and the hundred other issues all of which will end very, VERY badly.

Regardless of how we look at the US's current situation, it is clear that 2008 will NOT go down in history as THE Financial Crisis for the US. No, 2008 will be considered the "warm-up."

The reason for this is simple. 2008 was primarily the collapse of the private banking system in the US. The Fed's response to this was to transfer the garbage debts that nearly took down the banks ONTO the US's balance sheet.

Put another way, the Fed allowed the systemic risk to spread from private bank balance sheets ONTO the US's public balance sheet... which means the next Crisis will involve not only Wall Street and the banks but the US as a whole.

I'm talking about a sovereign debt Crisis. The kind of collapse we're now seeing in Greece... only for the single largest economy in the world as well as its reserve currency.

So what happens when this Crisis hits and a partial if not complete Government shutdown occurs? What happens when that 35% of incomes and salaries stops being paid? What happens when prisons and other Government paid services run out of money? What happens when the next major banking run reveals that there is no WAY on earth the FDIC can truly insure all the deposits in the US (other than more money printing from the Fed)? What happens when the US defaults on its debts?

I know the mainstream media isn't talking about this... but these are the same folks that didn't see 2008 coming.

Consider the following:

The US Federal Reserve which has been the primary buyer of US debt since 2008 is about to stop buying...

At the same time, the US Treasury is now raiding pension funds to meet new debt issuance (China and other foreign governments are no longer buying enough to meet supply)...

With the US Government now accounting for 35% of incomes in the US. If we default on the debt and can't keep funding the economy, we'll see about more than one third of the money Americans take home disappearing overnight.

And that's just the start...

Across the pond, Greece is imploding with riots. Germany doesn't want to dole out more bailout funds. Italy is thinking of opting out of the Euro completely. Spain's banks are insolvent and teetering on the brink of collapse.

Small wonder then that interbank liquidity is drying up. European banks are no longer willing to lend to each other bringing interbank liquidity close to 2008 levels.

The Euro continues to rally despite the clear fact that the Eurozone is a disaster. It's strange than grown adults can actually be discussing another Greek bailout when the first one was just one year ago and accomplished nothing. Of course, if the world traded based on fundamentals or common sense, the Euro wouldn't even exist at this point.

At the heart of this entire situation is the key relationship that determines all economic policy: the relationship between banks and politicians. Most voters in developed countries continue to believe that their vote has some kind of influence in politicians' decisions. They believe that they somehow can effect change at the ballot box.

The reality is that elections are largely for show these days. Politicians openly sell out their constituents to corporate donors, particularly banks, whether it be by directly taking large donations/ bribes or by appointing ex-bankers and other financial stooges to key decision making positions.

After all, when was the last time some politician picked an engineer or doctor or someone who might actually know anything about... well anything to a position of power? Try never.

No, instead politicians surround themselves with run of the mill financial stooges. Take the US where we allow guys who have rendered entire institutions (and endowments) bankrupt to be key economic decision makers. Heck, we even allow these types to "regulate" their former employers.

The situation is no better in Europe. German Chancellor Angela Merkel tries to maintain the illusion that she somehow will do the right thing (tell Greek bond holders to shove it) but in the end she always buckles. Why? Because German banks are on the hook for $65 billion worth of Greece's debt. And whenever she comes close to telling them to take a hit, someone calls her up and tells her that if she does this the bank will implode.

It's a perfect circle of influence: banks back politicians who once in office dish out the goodies/ handouts. And if the banks screw up, they threaten to take down the financial system, thereby destroying the politician's chance at re-election.

All in all the banks have done leverage buyouts of Government. The leverage is political in nature ("screw us and we'll take you down"). The buyout is in the form of donations/ bribes.

However, the primary problem with this system (aside from the fact it's completely immoral) is that there are no consequences for bad decisions for the banks. Thus, they keep making bigger and bigger bets using more and more leverage thereby increasing systemic risk.

Consider the derivatives market which now stands north of $600 TRILLION in size. How do you think this was allowed to happen? The banks pushed the politicians into rolling back regulation, the banks then went nuts, and now the entire financial system is in jeopardy.

We've already had a taste of this in 2008 when the Credit Default Swap (CDS) market, which was $50-60 trillion in size, blew up. We're now rapidly heading towards an interest rate Crisis and the interest rate-based derivative market is four times as large roughly $200 TRILLION.

And underneath ALL of these disasters lurks the $600 TRILLION global derivatives market... which continues to be the #1 threat to taking down the financial system (why do you think Bernanke's terrified despite spending $ TRILLIONS?)

Then end may be closer than you think.

Comment:

Comrades, the above article was NOT written by a National Socialist, despite the fact that he is saying the same things that we have been saying for years. The author, Graham Summers is a well known stock analyst in Charlottesville, Virginia.

Now I have to ask our detractors who believe we are being nothing but alarmists a question. When a long time tool of Judeo-Capitalism like Mr. Summers has lost faith in the system, isn't it time we all became alarmed?

There are riots in Greece and Spain over the economic crisis. Now I admit these countries have never been leaders in European economics, but the fact is, they are falling apart, and according to Mr. Summers and other experts, the rest of Europe is not far behind. Then will come OUR turn.

Taking all this into consideration, I hope you are aware that yesterday, President Obama went before Congress to get funding extended for his wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and anywhere else he deems necessary until at least the year 2014.

That's three more years! Billions, perhaps Trillions of dollars more! Where is the money coming from? The United States has more or less maxed out its credit cards. The only thing left to do is get the Federal Reserve Banksters to print more money. More pieces of paper that are becoming more worthless with each new bill that is printed.

This means inflation, and probably hyper-inflation for the people of this country. Comrades, THIS MADNESS MUST END! Under National Socialism, we could bring our troops home, and deploy them along the borders. We could repatriate (deport) all illegals, and stop legal immigration for a time, to allow the ratio of immigrants to native borns to return to a proper balance. We could put an end to criminal government waste. We could create a stable economy, and through the rebuilding of this broken nation and the manufacture of our own goods on American soil provide jobs for virtually everyone.

Our detractors say it couldn't work. But it can. It worked in Hitler's Germany, and it works today in the tiny island nation of Mauritius in the Indian Ocean. They will not call their system National Socialism, but it is patterned after it. They don't live in luxury, but they don't live in poverty either. I posted a story on Mauritius a few months ago. If you missed it, look it up. It's still among the older posts. If a tiny country that is smaller than Rhode Island can do it, so can we. Hail Victory!

Dan 88!