Navajo Indian Branded With Swastikas

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — A New Mexico man pleaded not guilty Monday to federal hate-crime charges in the case of a mentally disabled Navajo man who had a swastika branded on his arm with a hot metal clothes hanger.

William Hatch, 29, of Fruitland and two other defendants are the first to be prosecuted by the federal government under a historic 2009 law targeting hate crimes involving disabilities or sexual orientation.

Hatch entered the plea during his initial appearance at the federal courthouse.

Paul Beebe, 26, and Jesse Sanford, 25, both of Farmington, also appeared but had no attorneys and didn't enter pleas. U.S. Magistrate Robert Scott indicated he would have lawyers appointed to represent both men then scheduled their arraignments for Tuesday.

All three defendants wore orange inmate jumpsuits, with their hands and feet shackled.

Along with the branding in April, the three men are accused of shaving a swastika onto the back of the 22-year-old victim's head and using markers to write "KKK" and "White Power" on him.
Image: Swastika burned into man's arm
Farmington Police Dept. / AP
Three men are accused of branding a swastika onto a Navajo man.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Roberto Ortega said the case is the first in the nation to be pursued by the Justice Department under the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act.

The law was named after two men who were murdered in 1998 in Wyoming and Texas. The statute expanded a 1969 federal hate crime law to include crimes motivated by a victim's disability, gender, gender identity or sexual orientation.

Shepard was a gay Wyoming college student who was beaten and found dead tied to a fence post. Byrd was a black man who was chained to a pickup truck by three white men and dragged to his death.

Indictments in the New Mexico case were handed down on Nov. 12.

Hatch, Beebe and Sanford also face state charges of kidnapping, aggravated battery and conspiracy. The federal and state cases will run simultaneously, and federal prosecutors plan to work closely with the district attorney's office in Farmington.

If convicted of the hate crime statute, each defendant could face prison terms of up to 10 years. The possible sentence could increase to life if prosecutors prove kidnapping occurred.

Each also faces a conspiracy charge, which carries a possible five-year prison sentence upon conviction.

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comment:

This is exactly the kind of thing that we DON'T need happening. What did these three accomplish? Nothing constructive. All these turds succeeded in doing was to assault a harmless, disabled Native American, and give the media lots of ammunition to use against true National Socialists such as those in the ANP.

Remember comrades, the Jewish run media just laps this stuff up. It boosts their ratings, plus sets back our movement. If someday, a White revolution does occur, that's one thing, but random violence like this gives all of us a black eye.

I urge all of you to stay legal, and watch the racial slurs while in public. Words like Nigger uttered publicy only serve to show ignorance. The ANP is a respectable organisation. Let's all behave appropriately at all times. Hail Victory!

Navajo Indian Branded With Swastikas

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — A New Mexico man pleaded not guilty Monday to federal hate-crime charges in the case of a mentally disabled Navajo man who had a swastika branded on his arm with a hot metal clothes hanger.

William Hatch, 29, of Fruitland and two other defendants are the first to be prosecuted by the federal government under a historic 2009 law targeting hate crimes involving disabilities or sexual orientation.

Hatch entered the plea during his initial appearance at the federal courthouse.

Paul Beebe, 26, and Jesse Sanford, 25, both of Farmington, also appeared but had no attorneys and didn't enter pleas. U.S. Magistrate Robert Scott indicated he would have lawyers appointed to represent both men then scheduled their arraignments for Tuesday.

All three defendants wore orange inmate jumpsuits, with their hands and feet shackled.

Along with the branding in April, the three men are accused of shaving a swastika onto the back of the 22-year-old victim's head and using markers to write "KKK" and "White Power" on him.
Image: Swastika burned into man's arm
Farmington Police Dept. / AP
Three men are accused of branding a swastika onto a Navajo man.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Roberto Ortega said the case is the first in the nation to be pursued by the Justice Department under the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act.

The law was named after two men who were murdered in 1998 in Wyoming and Texas. The statute expanded a 1969 federal hate crime law to include crimes motivated by a victim's disability, gender, gender identity or sexual orientation.

Shepard was a gay Wyoming college student who was beaten and found dead tied to a fence post. Byrd was a black man who was chained to a pickup truck by three white men and dragged to his death.

Indictments in the New Mexico case were handed down on Nov. 12.

Hatch, Beebe and Sanford also face state charges of kidnapping, aggravated battery and conspiracy. The federal and state cases will run simultaneously, and federal prosecutors plan to work closely with the district attorney's office in Farmington.

If convicted of the hate crime statute, each defendant could face prison terms of up to 10 years. The possible sentence could increase to life if prosecutors prove kidnapping occurred.

Each also faces a conspiracy charge, which carries a possible five-year prison sentence upon conviction.

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comment:

This is exactly the kind of thing that we DON'T need happening. What did these three accomplish? Nothing constructive. All these turds succeeded in doing was to assault a harmless, disabled Native American, and give the media lots of ammunition to use against true National Socialists such as those in the ANP.

Remember comrades, the Jewish run media just laps this stuff up. It boosts their ratings, plus sets back our movement. If someday, a White revolution does occur, that's one thing, but random violence like this gives all of us a black eye.

I urge all of you to stay legal, and watch the racial slurs while in public. Words like Nigger uttered publicy only serve to show ignorance. The ANP is a respectable organisation. Let's all behave appropriately at all times. Hail Victory!

My First ANP Video

My First ANP Video

Smuggling Tunnel Found In San Diego

By ELLIOT SPAGAT, Associated Press Elliot Spagat, Associated Press – Nov. 26, 2010
SAN DIEGO – A sophisticated cross-border tunnel equipped with a rail system, ventilation and fluorescent lighting has been shut down by U.S. and Mexican officials — the second discovery of a major underground drug passage in San Diego this month, authorities said Friday.

The tunnel found Thursday is 2,200 feet long — more than seven football fields — and runs from the kitchen of a home in Tijuana, Mexico, to two warehouses in San Diego's Otay Mesa industrial district, said Mike Unzueta, head of investigations at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in San Diego.

In Mexico, the tunnel's cinderblock-lined entry dropped 80 to 90 feet to a wood-lined floor, Unzueta said. From the U.S. side, there was a stairway leading to a room about 50 feet underground that was full of marijuana.

"It's a lot like how the ancient Egyptians buried the kings and queens," Unzueta said.

Authorities seized more than 20 tons of marijuana.

Unzueta said the tunnel discovered Thursday and another found in early November are believed to be the work of Mexico's Sinaloa cartel, headed by that country's most-wanted drug lord, Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman.

"We think ultimately they are controlled by the same overall cartel but that the tunnels were being managed and run independently by different cells operating within the same organization," Unzueta said.

The passage found Thursday is one of the most advanced to date, with an entry shaft in Mexico lined with cinderblocks and a rail system for drugs to be carried on a small cart, Unzueta said.

Three men were arrested in the United States, and the Mexican military raided a ranch in Mexico and made five arrests in connection with the tunnel, authorities said.

U.S. authorities have discovered more than 125 clandestine tunnels along the Mexican border since the early 1990s, though many were crude and incomplete.

U.S. authorities do not know how long the latest tunnel was operating. Unzueta said investigators began to look into several warehouses in June on a tip that emerged from a large bust of marijuana, cocaine and methamphetamine by the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department.

U.S. authorities followed a trailer from one of the warehouses to a Border Patrol checkpoint in Temecula, where they seized 27,600 pounds of marijuana. The driver, whose name was not released, was arrested, along with two others who went to a residence in suburban El Cajon that had $13,500 cash inside.

"That (trailer) was literally filled top to bottom, front to back," Unzueta said. "There wasn't any room for anything else in that tractor-trailer but air."
Three tons of marijuana were found in a "subterranean room" and elsewhere in the tunnel on the U.S. side, authorities said. Mexican officials seized four tons of pot at a ranch in northern Mexico, bringing the total haul to more than 20 tons.

The discovery of the cross-border tunnel earlier this month marked one of the largest marijuana seizures in the United States, with agents confiscating 20 tons of marijuana they said was smuggled through the underground passage. One of the warehouses involved in the tunnel discovered Thursday is only a half-block away.
Several sophisticated tunnels have ended in San Diego warehouses. ICE began meeting with landowners last month to warn them about leasing space to tunnel builders.

"These owners of warehouses, they need to know their customers, they need to know who's in there leasing these things," Unzueta said.

Comment:

If the U.S. Government would pull our troops out of the Middle East and deploy them along the southern borders with full authority to act, things like this would be far less likely to happen. But no! We have to waste our time, money and resources fighting wars for Israeli interests.

Also, our unsecured borders serve different purposes in addition to that. The government doesn't want the borders too tightly secured. They need to keep the terrorist threat level high enough so they can crack down on us! This is of course, just an excuse to increase their control over the people.

Another reason is they don't want to interfere too much with the flow of illegal aliens across the border. ZOG is of course comprised of mostly wealthy Judeo-Capitalists who use the illegals as a source of cheap, exploitable labour. Employing these invaders while putting American Citizens, primarily White workers in the unemployment line, is one of the ways they increase their profit margins.

We don't need intrusive electronic security equipment at every airport, rail and bus station, and docks to make this country safe. What we need is our borders to be secured. When that's accomplished, then we'll be a lot safer without any loss of privacy, or any sacrifice of our constitutional rights.

Smuggling Tunnel Found In San Diego

By ELLIOT SPAGAT, Associated Press Elliot Spagat, Associated Press – Nov. 26, 2010
SAN DIEGO – A sophisticated cross-border tunnel equipped with a rail system, ventilation and fluorescent lighting has been shut down by U.S. and Mexican officials — the second discovery of a major underground drug passage in San Diego this month, authorities said Friday.

The tunnel found Thursday is 2,200 feet long — more than seven football fields — and runs from the kitchen of a home in Tijuana, Mexico, to two warehouses in San Diego's Otay Mesa industrial district, said Mike Unzueta, head of investigations at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in San Diego.

In Mexico, the tunnel's cinderblock-lined entry dropped 80 to 90 feet to a wood-lined floor, Unzueta said. From the U.S. side, there was a stairway leading to a room about 50 feet underground that was full of marijuana.

"It's a lot like how the ancient Egyptians buried the kings and queens," Unzueta said.

Authorities seized more than 20 tons of marijuana.

Unzueta said the tunnel discovered Thursday and another found in early November are believed to be the work of Mexico's Sinaloa cartel, headed by that country's most-wanted drug lord, Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman.

"We think ultimately they are controlled by the same overall cartel but that the tunnels were being managed and run independently by different cells operating within the same organization," Unzueta said.

The passage found Thursday is one of the most advanced to date, with an entry shaft in Mexico lined with cinderblocks and a rail system for drugs to be carried on a small cart, Unzueta said.

Three men were arrested in the United States, and the Mexican military raided a ranch in Mexico and made five arrests in connection with the tunnel, authorities said.

U.S. authorities have discovered more than 125 clandestine tunnels along the Mexican border since the early 1990s, though many were crude and incomplete.

U.S. authorities do not know how long the latest tunnel was operating. Unzueta said investigators began to look into several warehouses in June on a tip that emerged from a large bust of marijuana, cocaine and methamphetamine by the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department.

U.S. authorities followed a trailer from one of the warehouses to a Border Patrol checkpoint in Temecula, where they seized 27,600 pounds of marijuana. The driver, whose name was not released, was arrested, along with two others who went to a residence in suburban El Cajon that had $13,500 cash inside.

"That (trailer) was literally filled top to bottom, front to back," Unzueta said. "There wasn't any room for anything else in that tractor-trailer but air."
Three tons of marijuana were found in a "subterranean room" and elsewhere in the tunnel on the U.S. side, authorities said. Mexican officials seized four tons of pot at a ranch in northern Mexico, bringing the total haul to more than 20 tons.

The discovery of the cross-border tunnel earlier this month marked one of the largest marijuana seizures in the United States, with agents confiscating 20 tons of marijuana they said was smuggled through the underground passage. One of the warehouses involved in the tunnel discovered Thursday is only a half-block away.
Several sophisticated tunnels have ended in San Diego warehouses. ICE began meeting with landowners last month to warn them about leasing space to tunnel builders.

"These owners of warehouses, they need to know their customers, they need to know who's in there leasing these things," Unzueta said.

Comment:

If the U.S. Government would pull our troops out of the Middle East and deploy them along the southern borders with full authority to act, things like this would be far less likely to happen. But no! We have to waste our time, money and resources fighting wars for Israeli interests.

Also, our unsecured borders serve different purposes in addition to that. The government doesn't want the borders too tightly secured. They need to keep the terrorist threat level high enough so they can crack down on us! This is of course, just an excuse to increase their control over the people.

Another reason is they don't want to interfere too much with the flow of illegal aliens across the border. ZOG is of course comprised of mostly wealthy Judeo-Capitalists who use the illegals as a source of cheap, exploitable labour. Employing these invaders while putting American Citizens, primarily White workers in the unemployment line, is one of the ways they increase their profit margins.

We don't need intrusive electronic security equipment at every airport, rail and bus station, and docks to make this country safe. What we need is our borders to be secured. When that's accomplished, then we'll be a lot safer without any loss of privacy, or any sacrifice of our constitutional rights.

If You Travel, Leave Your Dignity At Home

Body Scanners and Intrusive Pat Downs To Be Implemented in Train Stations, Boats and Public Transportations Systems Nationwide!

Since the TSA ramped up their security measures in late October, American citizens have been subjected to the toxic naked body scanners as well as molestation at the hands of low IQ thugs. Contrary to what Janet Napolitano has publicly stated, the scanners do contain harmful radiation as outlined by numerous scientists. People such as Michael Chertoff have pushed the scanners while at the same time having huge financial holdings in the very companies that stand to make billions off of implementing them worldwide.



http://theintelhub.com/2010/11/24/bo...ms-nationwide/

As if the scanners weren’t bad enough, citizens who refuse the radiation are being subjected to intrusive and sometimes illegal searches. Six year old boys have been undressed and searched as terrorists, women have had their prosthetic breasts removed, urine bags have been broken, passengers have been arrested for opting out, and attractive women have been singled out for full body searches.


To add insult to injury, the TSA is actually running a blog that attempts to debunk the public outcry against their illegal acts. The blogs are written in a sarcastic tune in a way that implies that citizens who fight against their abuse will not only be arrested but will also be made fun of on an official agency blog.

This is happening despite widespread protest. Essentially, DHS officials have stated that the will of the American people matters very little and will not change their policy. Our beloved Constitution has been been deemed irrelevant by the very agents who have sworn to protect it. This is all being done in the name of saving us from the cave dwelling ninjas known as Al Qaeda.
The evidence that most terror attacks are staged and the creation of rogue intelligence agents rather than Islamic extremists has been completely ignored by the corporate media and politicians alike.


As the Thanksgiving travel season continues and thousands of people fall victim to TSA tyranny, DHS officials are contemplating installing body scanners at public places throughout America. Americans will no longer be able to take their family to a baseball game without idiot security agents harassing and searching the whole family.


It is very possible that Americans will be literally FORCED into the scanners if they wish to travel at all. Depopulation advocates worldwide are calling for the banning of all travel that isn’t deemed essential by the government. The only mode of transportation would then be public, where you will be treated like a terrorist until you are strip searched.


IF TSA head John Pistole gets his way, the scanners and security measures will be implemented on subways and trains throughout the U.S.

USA Today
ARLINGTON, Va. — Protecting riders on mass-transit systems from terrorist attacks will be as high a priority as ensuring safe air travel, the new head of the Transportation Security Administration promises.


In his first interview since taking over the TSA, former FBI deputy director John Pistole told USA TODAY that some terrorists consider subway and rail cars an easier target than heavily secured planes. “Given the list of threats on subways and rails over the last six years going on seven years, we know that some terrorist groups see rail and subways as being more vulnerable because there’s not the type of screening that you find in aviation,” he said. “From my perspective, that is an equally important threat area.”


How is it possible that Al Qaeda agents have the ability to attack our mass transit systemx? The CIA, Mossad, and MI6 literally have the ability to intercept/listen to communications worldwide. It is not possible for Al Qaeda to stage a major event without the help of rogue intelligence agents working at the behest of globalists whose aim is to establish a world governing body that would supersede the Constitution.


We are being led to believe that our fundamental rights must be taken away in order to stay safe from terrorists. The federal government is planning to install the body scanners and intrusive security measures at all large scale public areas at a time when the majority of Americans are outraged over the scanners being inside airports let alone multiple other public places. We have been given a clear message: Our feelings mean nothing and public outcry will only lead to more police state measures.


Instead of outlawing the scanners and TSA molestation, DHS head Janet Napolitano is pushing the same line as TSA head John Pistole.

The Hill
The next step in tightened security could be on U.S. public transportation, trains and boats.


Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano says terrorists will continue to look for U.S. vulnerabilities, making tighter security standards necessary.


“[Terrorists] are going to continue to probe the system and try to find a way through,” Napolitano said in an interview that aired Monday night on “Charlie Rose.”


“I think the tighter we get on aviation, we have to also be thinking now about going on to mass transit or to trains or maritime. So, what do we need to be doing to strengthen our protections there?”

One of the only possible measures that we can take is to literally not comply. We must stand up and opt out as a country before our country becomes a third world police state playground.

Comment:

Just posting this article can land me on the TSA's "No Fly" List. TSA has stated that critisizing security measures is circumstancial evidence that you are a terrorist. They reason that if you have nothing to hide, then you shouldn't object. After all, it's for your safety. THAT ISN'T THE POINT! The point is that these overkill tactics are an insult to the dignity of American citizens! They are intrusive, and an invasion of privacy. As a nation, we indeed must stand up against the government and say "NO!"

Those who trade their freedom for safety deserve neither. - Benjamin Franklin.

If You Travel, Leave Your Dignity At Home

Body Scanners and Intrusive Pat Downs To Be Implemented in Train Stations, Boats and Public Transportations Systems Nationwide!

Since the TSA ramped up their security measures in late October, American citizens have been subjected to the toxic naked body scanners as well as molestation at the hands of low IQ thugs. Contrary to what Janet Napolitano has publicly stated, the scanners do contain harmful radiation as outlined by numerous scientists. People such as Michael Chertoff have pushed the scanners while at the same time having huge financial holdings in the very companies that stand to make billions off of implementing them worldwide.



http://theintelhub.com/2010/11/24/bo...ms-nationwide/

As if the scanners weren’t bad enough, citizens who refuse the radiation are being subjected to intrusive and sometimes illegal searches. Six year old boys have been undressed and searched as terrorists, women have had their prosthetic breasts removed, urine bags have been broken, passengers have been arrested for opting out, and attractive women have been singled out for full body searches.


To add insult to injury, the TSA is actually running a blog that attempts to debunk the public outcry against their illegal acts. The blogs are written in a sarcastic tune in a way that implies that citizens who fight against their abuse will not only be arrested but will also be made fun of on an official agency blog.

This is happening despite widespread protest. Essentially, DHS officials have stated that the will of the American people matters very little and will not change their policy. Our beloved Constitution has been been deemed irrelevant by the very agents who have sworn to protect it. This is all being done in the name of saving us from the cave dwelling ninjas known as Al Qaeda.
The evidence that most terror attacks are staged and the creation of rogue intelligence agents rather than Islamic extremists has been completely ignored by the corporate media and politicians alike.


As the Thanksgiving travel season continues and thousands of people fall victim to TSA tyranny, DHS officials are contemplating installing body scanners at public places throughout America. Americans will no longer be able to take their family to a baseball game without idiot security agents harassing and searching the whole family.


It is very possible that Americans will be literally FORCED into the scanners if they wish to travel at all. Depopulation advocates worldwide are calling for the banning of all travel that isn’t deemed essential by the government. The only mode of transportation would then be public, where you will be treated like a terrorist until you are strip searched.


IF TSA head John Pistole gets his way, the scanners and security measures will be implemented on subways and trains throughout the U.S.

USA Today
ARLINGTON, Va. — Protecting riders on mass-transit systems from terrorist attacks will be as high a priority as ensuring safe air travel, the new head of the Transportation Security Administration promises.


In his first interview since taking over the TSA, former FBI deputy director John Pistole told USA TODAY that some terrorists consider subway and rail cars an easier target than heavily secured planes. “Given the list of threats on subways and rails over the last six years going on seven years, we know that some terrorist groups see rail and subways as being more vulnerable because there’s not the type of screening that you find in aviation,” he said. “From my perspective, that is an equally important threat area.”


How is it possible that Al Qaeda agents have the ability to attack our mass transit systemx? The CIA, Mossad, and MI6 literally have the ability to intercept/listen to communications worldwide. It is not possible for Al Qaeda to stage a major event without the help of rogue intelligence agents working at the behest of globalists whose aim is to establish a world governing body that would supersede the Constitution.


We are being led to believe that our fundamental rights must be taken away in order to stay safe from terrorists. The federal government is planning to install the body scanners and intrusive security measures at all large scale public areas at a time when the majority of Americans are outraged over the scanners being inside airports let alone multiple other public places. We have been given a clear message: Our feelings mean nothing and public outcry will only lead to more police state measures.


Instead of outlawing the scanners and TSA molestation, DHS head Janet Napolitano is pushing the same line as TSA head John Pistole.

The Hill
The next step in tightened security could be on U.S. public transportation, trains and boats.


Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano says terrorists will continue to look for U.S. vulnerabilities, making tighter security standards necessary.


“[Terrorists] are going to continue to probe the system and try to find a way through,” Napolitano said in an interview that aired Monday night on “Charlie Rose.”


“I think the tighter we get on aviation, we have to also be thinking now about going on to mass transit or to trains or maritime. So, what do we need to be doing to strengthen our protections there?”

One of the only possible measures that we can take is to literally not comply. We must stand up and opt out as a country before our country becomes a third world police state playground.

Comment:

Just posting this article can land me on the TSA's "No Fly" List. TSA has stated that critisizing security measures is circumstancial evidence that you are a terrorist. They reason that if you have nothing to hide, then you shouldn't object. After all, it's for your safety. THAT ISN'T THE POINT! The point is that these overkill tactics are an insult to the dignity of American citizens! They are intrusive, and an invasion of privacy. As a nation, we indeed must stand up against the government and say "NO!"

Those who trade their freedom for safety deserve neither. - Benjamin Franklin.

True Story! - Happy Thanksgiving Comrades!

True Story! - Happy Thanksgiving Comrades!

Some Illegals Will Have A Better Thanksgiving Than Some Of Us!

Illegal Immigrants With Fake Social Securities Get Tax Refunds!

An advocacy group partially funded by the U.S. government is helping illegal immigrants who work with fake Social Security numbers recover unclaimed income tax refunds.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/20...et-tax-refunds

The New York nonprofit, Neighborhood Economic Development Advocacy Project, has so far helped a dozen illegal aliens get back thousands of dollars in state tax refunds, according to a local newspaper report. In some cases the undocumented aliens use bogus Social Security numbers, which is a serious federal offense.

In most instances the illegal immigrants filed taxes using a special identification number that rarely receives scrutiny from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and allows workers to get federal refunds. However, New York’s tax agency flags employees who provide mismatched information like a Social Security that doesn’t correlate with a name and doesn’t mail refunds to those candidates.

Thanks to the Neighborhood Economic Development Advocacy Project, which receives money from city, state and federal government sources, those lawbreakers are getting refunds. After all, the group aims to promote financial justice in New York’s low-income communities and in communities of color. It also strives to eliminate discriminatory economic practices that harm communities and perpetuate inequality and poverty.

What about the injustice in stealing someone’s identity? The group’s associate director claims it’s a harmless crime because most illegal immigrants use Social Security numbers that are made up and not stolen from a real person. Either way, the immigrant advocate reminds that labor laws protect all workers, even the undocumented.

Comment:

I think I'm confused here. Financial justice for illegals? Refunds? Since when do illegals pay income taxes? If some of them are, then that must mean they have filed a W-2 form with the IRS. If so, then a citizenship document must be on file. If it isn't, and they aren't citizens, then there is no proof of citizenship or green card on file, so the IRS must know they are illegals, yet they are still withholding taxes from them, not giving them refunds, but still allowing them to stay in the country. Does this sound likely? I'll bet it is. As long as they are paying, the IRS is not going to do a damn thing, especially if they are paying in, but not getting any refunds. ZOG is getting paid, and they don't have to pay back, so they certainly won't want to deport their gravy train.

Comrades, this kind of corruption must stop now! Our government is supposed to be a government of the people, not against the people. But that is exactly what it has become. They do as they see fit, and we can just like it or lump it. I say we do neither. It's time to stand up to ZOG and DEMAND that the will of the people be enacted.

When the government fails to serve the people, it's time for a new government. - Thomas Jefferson.

The government has failed to serve the people. WWTJD (What Would Thomas Jefferson Do)?

Some Illegals Will Have A Better Thanksgiving Than Some Of Us!

Illegal Immigrants With Fake Social Securities Get Tax Refunds!

An advocacy group partially funded by the U.S. government is helping illegal immigrants who work with fake Social Security numbers recover unclaimed income tax refunds.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/20...et-tax-refunds

The New York nonprofit, Neighborhood Economic Development Advocacy Project, has so far helped a dozen illegal aliens get back thousands of dollars in state tax refunds, according to a local newspaper report. In some cases the undocumented aliens use bogus Social Security numbers, which is a serious federal offense.

In most instances the illegal immigrants filed taxes using a special identification number that rarely receives scrutiny from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and allows workers to get federal refunds. However, New York’s tax agency flags employees who provide mismatched information like a Social Security that doesn’t correlate with a name and doesn’t mail refunds to those candidates.

Thanks to the Neighborhood Economic Development Advocacy Project, which receives money from city, state and federal government sources, those lawbreakers are getting refunds. After all, the group aims to promote financial justice in New York’s low-income communities and in communities of color. It also strives to eliminate discriminatory economic practices that harm communities and perpetuate inequality and poverty.

What about the injustice in stealing someone’s identity? The group’s associate director claims it’s a harmless crime because most illegal immigrants use Social Security numbers that are made up and not stolen from a real person. Either way, the immigrant advocate reminds that labor laws protect all workers, even the undocumented.

Comment:

I think I'm confused here. Financial justice for illegals? Refunds? Since when do illegals pay income taxes? If some of them are, then that must mean they have filed a W-2 form with the IRS. If so, then a citizenship document must be on file. If it isn't, and they aren't citizens, then there is no proof of citizenship or green card on file, so the IRS must know they are illegals, yet they are still withholding taxes from them, not giving them refunds, but still allowing them to stay in the country. Does this sound likely? I'll bet it is. As long as they are paying, the IRS is not going to do a damn thing, especially if they are paying in, but not getting any refunds. ZOG is getting paid, and they don't have to pay back, so they certainly won't want to deport their gravy train.

Comrades, this kind of corruption must stop now! Our government is supposed to be a government of the people, not against the people. But that is exactly what it has become. They do as they see fit, and we can just like it or lump it. I say we do neither. It's time to stand up to ZOG and DEMAND that the will of the people be enacted.

When the government fails to serve the people, it's time for a new government. - Thomas Jefferson.

The government has failed to serve the people. WWTJD (What Would Thomas Jefferson Do)?

Cars: New Or Used?

In case some of you are wondering why I've been writing so many financial articles lately, the answer is simple. The real purpose of credit in this corrupt system of theirs, is to separate you from as much money as possible. I'm just trying to inform you and give you some facts you can use if you feel you must use the Judeo-Capitalist credit system.

But anyway, should you buy used or new? Well, that depends on what you can afford, and what your specific needs are. Anyone who buys a new car or motorcycle and finances it, when they don't really need it, they just want it, is a sucker and they deserve to lose their money. That's harsh, but it's true. If you can't afford to pay cash, then you don't need it. I have a truck and a Harley and I own the pink slips (which are now green in California), and I wouldn't have it any other way.

You might say, "But cars are so expensive. Most of us could never afford to pay cash. And when your old car goes out on you, you need another one fast." True enough. But the question is do you need a NEW car, or do you just want one. Needing and wanting are two completely different things.

If you consider interest rates, finance charges, full coverage accident and theft insurance, life insurance that pays off the finance company in case you have a heart attack or something, plus any other fees, by the time you've paid it all off, you've paid double what the car was orginally worth. Also, never forget that once the wheels touch the street after you buy a new car, it is no longer a new car. If you want to sell it for some reason, no dealer will give you full value because it is a used car, even if you've only had it for one day. In other words, you're being ripped off royally.

And for those of you who like SUV's, but never go off roading, you are double suckers. Now I'm not familiar with the laws in all the states, just here in California. What does SUV stand for? SPORT Utility Vehicle. They key word is sport. In California, that makes it a sports car. Vehicle registration fees are higher for all sports vehicles. Also, insurance rates are higher as well. PLUS, SUV's are four wheel drive. In California it's also an extra registration fee for four wheel drives, and the insurance companies are allow to charge you even more for coverage. If you own an SUV in California, you're getting ripped off four different ways as compared to a two wheel drive, non-sport vehicle. Hey, if you like throwing your money away, send it to me. I could always use some extra. I'm serious. Why give it to the bankers? Help out a Party Comrade and give it to me! P.O. Box 2145, Rialto, Ca., 92377.

As to leasing, that's even worse. I remember when Homer Simpson bought an SUV called a Canyonero. Here's the conversation.

Salesman: Now Mr. Simpson, I've broken your lease down for you. Here's your monthly payment, your weekly payment, and your CPB.

Homer: What's a CPB?

Salesman: Crippling balloon payment.

Homer: But that's not for a long time, right?

Salesman: Right!

Homer: Sweet!

There are some advantages with leasing over buying, but in the end, it's really going to cost you. DON'T DO IT! In many cases there is a CPB. Watch for it when leasing.

There's a common belief that when you buy or lease, you have a three day "cooling off" period where you can change your mind and get out of the contract without any penalty. Is this true? Not in California it isn't. There is no cooling off period. However, if you insist on financing or leasing a car, you can negotiate a clause in your contract for a cooling off period. I highly recommend you do. That way if you do change your mind, you're not stuck.

As to buying used, there are two old sayings, "Buy a used car, you buy someone else's troubles." And, "You buys your ticket and takes your chances." However, if you know a little something about cars, or have a friend who does, you can get a decent car and avoid the lemons. In California, you have the right to take a car you're thinking of buying to your mechanic (at your expense) before you pay the owner anything. Also, even if you buy the car "as is", the seller is responsible for replacing any missing emissions control equipment. For example, if you go to get your car smogged, and the technician says, "Sorry, I can't put this on the machine. Your O 2 sensor is missing." The one you bought the car from is obligated by law to buy you a new sensor. Also, if he knew the car was a piece of junk and told you it was a good car, he has committed fraud and must give you your money back, even if you bought it "as is." If he won't, sue his ass.

Another way to go is auto auctions. They are all over the place, and it's easy to do. Right now, I own a 1999 Ford F150 Pick Up. I bought it last year at a police auction for $525, plus tax and registration fees. About $675 out the door. That's right, a 1999 six cylinder truck in good to excellent condition for a total of $675. Did it need any repairs? Yes, a front windshield, cost $100 even. That's a total of $775 for tax, registration, price, and repairs. I sold my old Chevy S10 for $675, meaning this truck cost me only $100 including all fees. You can't beat that! I've never liked cops, but I got something off of them this time, and it was not a fluke. I helped a friend get a Bronco for $575. I saw someone get a 2005 Ford Escort for $250! Call your local police or sheriff and ask where the nearest police auction is. Then call them and ask when the next one will be, and when the viewing will be so you can see the cars before you buy. There are also private auctions, but expect the bidding to start higher, as they are out to make a profit, and all the cops care about is getting the towing and impound fees covered by the sale. Private auctions can be found in the Yellow Pages, or on Google. All police auctions require that you have a valid driver's licence. If you don't, give the money to a friend and have him or her buy it for you. Sh! You didn't hear that!

Now I must warn you that auctions are different from sales. Buying at auctions really is "as is". NO EXCEPTIONS. If you don't know anything about cars, bring a friend who does. That way you can avoid the junk, and have a better chance at a good car. I bought both my old Chevy S10 and my Ford F150 at auction. A winner both times. BTW, I drove my Ford all the way to Pulaski, Tennessee and back to San Bernardino last summer. The only problem I had was one flat tire. But I do know a little something about cars. If you go to an auction, I recommend you don't go alone, unless you too are car savvy.

As you may see, I'm partial to auctions. Not just because I can save a fortune, but because I can keep my hard earned money from the greedy banksters. Never forget that they are out to take as much of your money as they can. No matter how friendly they sound, they want your money, not your friendship. I won't give them either. As a National Socialist, I don't support the credit system, and neither should you. Credit is to be used as a last resort, and only after you've tried everything else. If you can get a nice car, plus keep your money away from the vultures, then you're batting a thousand in my book!

Cars: New Or Used?

In case some of you are wondering why I've been writing so many financial articles lately, the answer is simple. The real purpose of credit in this corrupt system of theirs, is to separate you from as much money as possible. I'm just trying to inform you and give you some facts you can use if you feel you must use the Judeo-Capitalist credit system.

But anyway, should you buy used or new? Well, that depends on what you can afford, and what your specific needs are. Anyone who buys a new car or motorcycle and finances it, when they don't really need it, they just want it, is a sucker and they deserve to lose their money. That's harsh, but it's true. If you can't afford to pay cash, then you don't need it. I have a truck and a Harley and I own the pink slips (which are now green in California), and I wouldn't have it any other way.

You might say, "But cars are so expensive. Most of us could never afford to pay cash. And when your old car goes out on you, you need another one fast." True enough. But the question is do you need a NEW car, or do you just want one. Needing and wanting are two completely different things.

If you consider interest rates, finance charges, full coverage accident and theft insurance, life insurance that pays off the finance company in case you have a heart attack or something, plus any other fees, by the time you've paid it all off, you've paid double what the car was orginally worth. Also, never forget that once the wheels touch the street after you buy a new car, it is no longer a new car. If you want to sell it for some reason, no dealer will give you full value because it is a used car, even if you've only had it for one day. In other words, you're being ripped off royally.

And for those of you who like SUV's, but never go off roading, you are double suckers. Now I'm not familiar with the laws in all the states, just here in California. What does SUV stand for? SPORT Utility Vehicle. They key word is sport. In California, that makes it a sports car. Vehicle registration fees are higher for all sports vehicles. Also, insurance rates are higher as well. PLUS, SUV's are four wheel drive. In California it's also an extra registration fee for four wheel drives, and the insurance companies are allow to charge you even more for coverage. If you own an SUV in California, you're getting ripped off four different ways as compared to a two wheel drive, non-sport vehicle. Hey, if you like throwing your money away, send it to me. I could always use some extra. I'm serious. Why give it to the bankers? Help out a Party Comrade and give it to me! P.O. Box 2145, Rialto, Ca., 92377.

As to leasing, that's even worse. I remember when Homer Simpson bought an SUV called a Canyonero. Here's the conversation.

Salesman: Now Mr. Simpson, I've broken your lease down for you. Here's your monthly payment, your weekly payment, and your CPB.

Homer: What's a CPB?

Salesman: Crippling balloon payment.

Homer: But that's not for a long time, right?

Salesman: Right!

Homer: Sweet!

There are some advantages with leasing over buying, but in the end, it's really going to cost you. DON'T DO IT! In many cases there is a CPB. Watch for it when leasing.

There's a common belief that when you buy or lease, you have a three day "cooling off" period where you can change your mind and get out of the contract without any penalty. Is this true? Not in California it isn't. There is no cooling off period. However, if you insist on financing or leasing a car, you can negotiate a clause in your contract for a cooling off period. I highly recommend you do. That way if you do change your mind, you're not stuck.

As to buying used, there are two old sayings, "Buy a used car, you buy someone else's troubles." And, "You buys your ticket and takes your chances." However, if you know a little something about cars, or have a friend who does, you can get a decent car and avoid the lemons. In California, you have the right to take a car you're thinking of buying to your mechanic (at your expense) before you pay the owner anything. Also, even if you buy the car "as is", the seller is responsible for replacing any missing emissions control equipment. For example, if you go to get your car smogged, and the technician says, "Sorry, I can't put this on the machine. Your O 2 sensor is missing." The one you bought the car from is obligated by law to buy you a new sensor. Also, if he knew the car was a piece of junk and told you it was a good car, he has committed fraud and must give you your money back, even if you bought it "as is." If he won't, sue his ass.

Another way to go is auto auctions. They are all over the place, and it's easy to do. Right now, I own a 1999 Ford F150 Pick Up. I bought it last year at a police auction for $525, plus tax and registration fees. About $675 out the door. That's right, a 1999 six cylinder truck in good to excellent condition for a total of $675. Did it need any repairs? Yes, a front windshield, cost $100 even. That's a total of $775 for tax, registration, price, and repairs. I sold my old Chevy S10 for $675, meaning this truck cost me only $100 including all fees. You can't beat that! I've never liked cops, but I got something off of them this time, and it was not a fluke. I helped a friend get a Bronco for $575. I saw someone get a 2005 Ford Escort for $250! Call your local police or sheriff and ask where the nearest police auction is. Then call them and ask when the next one will be, and when the viewing will be so you can see the cars before you buy. There are also private auctions, but expect the bidding to start higher, as they are out to make a profit, and all the cops care about is getting the towing and impound fees covered by the sale. Private auctions can be found in the Yellow Pages, or on Google. All police auctions require that you have a valid driver's licence. If you don't, give the money to a friend and have him or her buy it for you. Sh! You didn't hear that!

Now I must warn you that auctions are different from sales. Buying at auctions really is "as is". NO EXCEPTIONS. If you don't know anything about cars, bring a friend who does. That way you can avoid the junk, and have a better chance at a good car. I bought both my old Chevy S10 and my Ford F150 at auction. A winner both times. BTW, I drove my Ford all the way to Pulaski, Tennessee and back to San Bernardino last summer. The only problem I had was one flat tire. But I do know a little something about cars. If you go to an auction, I recommend you don't go alone, unless you too are car savvy.

As you may see, I'm partial to auctions. Not just because I can save a fortune, but because I can keep my hard earned money from the greedy banksters. Never forget that they are out to take as much of your money as they can. No matter how friendly they sound, they want your money, not your friendship. I won't give them either. As a National Socialist, I don't support the credit system, and neither should you. Credit is to be used as a last resort, and only after you've tried everything else. If you can get a nice car, plus keep your money away from the vultures, then you're batting a thousand in my book!

Thanks!

I just want to take a moment to thank everyone who has signed on as a follower of this blog. I hope to be able to continue to keep you well informed about National Socialism and the ANP for a long while to come.

Thanks!

I just want to take a moment to thank everyone who has signed on as a follower of this blog. I hope to be able to continue to keep you well informed about National Socialism and the ANP for a long while to come.

Real Estate And Lawyers

What do lawyers and catfish have in common? They're both scum-sucking bottom dwellers! LOL

Many people wonder if it is worth the cost to have an attorney look over your mortgage before you sign it. That all depends. Especially for first time home buyers, an attorney is not needed - if you want the banks to take advantage of you, that is. Trust me, they will take every advantage they can. You need to be prepared. That means an attorney. If you have a friend who is a banker or a real estate agent, they will do. If you call around, many attorneys will look over a mortgage and advise you for $50 - $100. Just consider that part of your home buying expenses. It's a small enough price to pay for a little peace of mind.

But why do you need one? Well, do you know the difference between adjustable and fixed interest rates? Do you understand closing costs? How about property insurance (in case the house burns down), or life insurance (in case you die outside of the home so the bank gets paid off)? You go to the bank to close the deal, and they hand you a stack of papers two or three inches thick and tell you to sign and/or initial in a dozen or more places. Of course, first they tell you to read it all. How many of you actually would sit there and read all of that? And even if you would, how many of you would even understand it? "The party of the first part, in consideration of the party of the second part, in conjuction with the party of the third part, do hereby stipulate and affirm, blah, blah, blah..." You may not want to openly admit that you don't understand the majority of that goobledygook, but are you going to sign it anyway to avoid a little embarrassment? Not if you have any brains you won't. Most of us would need help, and the intelligent thing to do is get it now, or be sorry later.

You may think you can get the gist of it, and ask the banker for further clarification. Bad idea. As Comrade Taylor Bowles wrote in the last issue of the White Worker, people have become poor deep readers. They'll read the first line or two thoroughly, then start skimming a few lines, then read another line deeply, then start skimming again. He described it as an "F" pattern, and accurately so. But call it what you may, you won't get a proper understanding of what you're reading that way. Add to it that it is written in legal and banking jargon - forget it. Many people, afraid of being embarrassed, just pretend they're reading, then say they understand, then sign on the dotted line, thereby giving their souls to the devil, so to speak. I wouldn't trust the banker to help you understand. He doesn't want you to. He'll of course say, "Don't worry, it's just a standard contract." Maybe so, but do you really understand how a standard contract works? He may also say something about a particular clause in the mortgage that you are concerned about in this way, "Don't be concerned. It's for your protection." Yeah right. If you believe that one, you are a sucker. The banks aren't going to do anything that will benefit you over them. They are out to take as much of your money as they can, and you can take that to the bank!

Buying a house can be totally overwhelming. Make it easier on yourself. Pay that very reasonable fee and have an attorney look over all the paperwork for you. You'll sleep better at night.

Attorneys do indeed work for a corrupt, Judeo-Capitalist system, but if you're smart, you can use that to your advantage. In a true National Socialist state, the only use we'd have for attorneys would be in primarily criminal and political matters. Buying a house would be simple and straightforward. Until that day comes, you must use every resource at your disposal to keep the leeches from draining you dry.

Real Estate And Lawyers

What do lawyers and catfish have in common? They're both scum-sucking bottom dwellers! LOL

Many people wonder if it is worth the cost to have an attorney look over your mortgage before you sign it. That all depends. Especially for first time home buyers, an attorney is not needed - if you want the banks to take advantage of you, that is. Trust me, they will take every advantage they can. You need to be prepared. That means an attorney. If you have a friend who is a banker or a real estate agent, they will do. If you call around, many attorneys will look over a mortgage and advise you for $50 - $100. Just consider that part of your home buying expenses. It's a small enough price to pay for a little peace of mind.

But why do you need one? Well, do you know the difference between adjustable and fixed interest rates? Do you understand closing costs? How about property insurance (in case the house burns down), or life insurance (in case you die outside of the home so the bank gets paid off)? You go to the bank to close the deal, and they hand you a stack of papers two or three inches thick and tell you to sign and/or initial in a dozen or more places. Of course, first they tell you to read it all. How many of you actually would sit there and read all of that? And even if you would, how many of you would even understand it? "The party of the first part, in consideration of the party of the second part, in conjuction with the party of the third part, do hereby stipulate and affirm, blah, blah, blah..." You may not want to openly admit that you don't understand the majority of that goobledygook, but are you going to sign it anyway to avoid a little embarrassment? Not if you have any brains you won't. Most of us would need help, and the intelligent thing to do is get it now, or be sorry later.

You may think you can get the gist of it, and ask the banker for further clarification. Bad idea. As Comrade Taylor Bowles wrote in the last issue of the White Worker, people have become poor deep readers. They'll read the first line or two thoroughly, then start skimming a few lines, then read another line deeply, then start skimming again. He described it as an "F" pattern, and accurately so. But call it what you may, you won't get a proper understanding of what you're reading that way. Add to it that it is written in legal and banking jargon - forget it. Many people, afraid of being embarrassed, just pretend they're reading, then say they understand, then sign on the dotted line, thereby giving their souls to the devil, so to speak. I wouldn't trust the banker to help you understand. He doesn't want you to. He'll of course say, "Don't worry, it's just a standard contract." Maybe so, but do you really understand how a standard contract works? He may also say something about a particular clause in the mortgage that you are concerned about in this way, "Don't be concerned. It's for your protection." Yeah right. If you believe that one, you are a sucker. The banks aren't going to do anything that will benefit you over them. They are out to take as much of your money as they can, and you can take that to the bank!

Buying a house can be totally overwhelming. Make it easier on yourself. Pay that very reasonable fee and have an attorney look over all the paperwork for you. You'll sleep better at night.

Attorneys do indeed work for a corrupt, Judeo-Capitalist system, but if you're smart, you can use that to your advantage. In a true National Socialist state, the only use we'd have for attorneys would be in primarily criminal and political matters. Buying a house would be simple and straightforward. Until that day comes, you must use every resource at your disposal to keep the leeches from draining you dry.

The American Dream

The American Dream has always been to own your own home. However, thanks to the Judeo-Capitalist banking system, that dream has become a nightmare. However, with the proper knowledge, you can reduce that nightmare to a minimum.

First of all, do the banks want you to default on your mortgage? Well, yes and no. Yes they want you to default so they can foreclose and take your house, but they don't want to do it for several years. When they foreclose, you lose all your equity (the amount you have paid-off). Most people have a 30 year mortgage. If you paid ten years worth, that's one third, and then fall on hard times due to say a layoff, they have all your money, plus a house they can resell at full value. You must pay a minimum amount before it pays them to foreclose. How long do you suppose that is? At least five years.

One of the things that caused the bottom to drop out of the real estate market back in 2008 was the "adjustable rate mortgage." The banks would offer consumers a mortgage rate with lower interest and monthly payments - for a certain period of time, which was five years. Its sort of like how the cable TV companies offer low rates to new customers for one year on a two year contract. After the first year, your rates go way up and you have to pay, because you have a contract. Same with these mortgages, except that it goes up after five years, rather than one.

If you think about it, it may sound like a good deal, but only if you know you can make the payments when the rates readjust in five years. The problem with this is mainly the consumers. They buy a house with a rate they can afford now, but not in five years. They figure that in five years they'll be making a lot more money than today. They count on raises, promotions, or getting a better job. They basically gamble that they'll be doing better in five years than today. What are the stakes for you? Your house. If you guess wrong about your future earnings, you lose everything. The banks NEVER lose. If you can make your payments when the rates readjust, the banks get their money. If you can't, they get your house and keep the fives years of payments you paid them.

Let me ask you all this. Would you make a large wager with money you don't have and can't get? I have a friend who will bet on anything. He'll bet on the weather, how you're feeling, just about anything. Now this may shock you, but when a crazy guy like that bets, sometimes he bets more than he has. Now when he wins, that's OK. But when he loses - well, you get my meaning. If you buy a house and can pay now, but not in five years, you are gambling with money you don't have. Can any of us be certain we'll be doing better in five years than today? In these uncertain times, definitely not. But even when times were financially good, you still can't be certain. You are still gambling that you'll be making more money in five years than today, and that is a tragic mistake. Companies lay off, downsize, and outsource jobs. You never know. When getting such a mortgage, if you can make the payments now, but not when the rates readjust, then you cannot afford this house. Don't gamble with your family's future. For you, it is a break even/lose situation. But for the banks, it is a break even/win situation.

A National Socialist government would provide the people with affordable, decent homes, with interest free mortgages. The consumer would only pay for the paperwork costs, and no hidden or junk fees. How could it do this? Easy. Unlike the banks, whose sole purpose is to take as much of your money as it can, the government would only charge for the cost of the loan. NO PROFITS! National Socialism works for the benefit of its people. IT NEVER EXPLOITS THEM.

The American Nazi Party is the best chance to achieve such a government. We have a plan, and good people. We have even had people running for office. Truthfully, they didn't win. But it was only the first election. Remember, when Hitler ran for president, he lost to Hindenburg. The first step towards success is running. We've taken that step. We'll keep going, and eventually, we'll succeed. Be apart of this. If you are not already an ANP Supporter, become one now!

The American Dream

The American Dream has always been to own your own home. However, thanks to the Judeo-Capitalist banking system, that dream has become a nightmare. However, with the proper knowledge, you can reduce that nightmare to a minimum.

First of all, do the banks want you to default on your mortgage? Well, yes and no. Yes they want you to default so they can foreclose and take your house, but they don't want to do it for several years. When they foreclose, you lose all your equity (the amount you have paid-off). Most people have a 30 year mortgage. If you paid ten years worth, that's one third, and then fall on hard times due to say a layoff, they have all your money, plus a house they can resell at full value. You must pay a minimum amount before it pays them to foreclose. How long do you suppose that is? At least five years.

One of the things that caused the bottom to drop out of the real estate market back in 2008 was the "adjustable rate mortgage." The banks would offer consumers a mortgage rate with lower interest and monthly payments - for a certain period of time, which was five years. Its sort of like how the cable TV companies offer low rates to new customers for one year on a two year contract. After the first year, your rates go way up and you have to pay, because you have a contract. Same with these mortgages, except that it goes up after five years, rather than one.

If you think about it, it may sound like a good deal, but only if you know you can make the payments when the rates readjust in five years. The problem with this is mainly the consumers. They buy a house with a rate they can afford now, but not in five years. They figure that in five years they'll be making a lot more money than today. They count on raises, promotions, or getting a better job. They basically gamble that they'll be doing better in five years than today. What are the stakes for you? Your house. If you guess wrong about your future earnings, you lose everything. The banks NEVER lose. If you can make your payments when the rates readjust, the banks get their money. If you can't, they get your house and keep the fives years of payments you paid them.

Let me ask you all this. Would you make a large wager with money you don't have and can't get? I have a friend who will bet on anything. He'll bet on the weather, how you're feeling, just about anything. Now this may shock you, but when a crazy guy like that bets, sometimes he bets more than he has. Now when he wins, that's OK. But when he loses - well, you get my meaning. If you buy a house and can pay now, but not in five years, you are gambling with money you don't have. Can any of us be certain we'll be doing better in five years than today? In these uncertain times, definitely not. But even when times were financially good, you still can't be certain. You are still gambling that you'll be making more money in five years than today, and that is a tragic mistake. Companies lay off, downsize, and outsource jobs. You never know. When getting such a mortgage, if you can make the payments now, but not when the rates readjust, then you cannot afford this house. Don't gamble with your family's future. For you, it is a break even/lose situation. But for the banks, it is a break even/win situation.

A National Socialist government would provide the people with affordable, decent homes, with interest free mortgages. The consumer would only pay for the paperwork costs, and no hidden or junk fees. How could it do this? Easy. Unlike the banks, whose sole purpose is to take as much of your money as it can, the government would only charge for the cost of the loan. NO PROFITS! National Socialism works for the benefit of its people. IT NEVER EXPLOITS THEM.

The American Nazi Party is the best chance to achieve such a government. We have a plan, and good people. We have even had people running for office. Truthfully, they didn't win. But it was only the first election. Remember, when Hitler ran for president, he lost to Hindenburg. The first step towards success is running. We've taken that step. We'll keep going, and eventually, we'll succeed. Be apart of this. If you are not already an ANP Supporter, become one now!

And The Libertards Say Illegals Don't Cost That Much!

U.S. Spending At Least $18.6 Million Per Day to Incarcerate Illegal Aliens
More Than 195,000 Illegal Aliens Deported in Fiscal 2010 Had Committed Crimes Here

CNSNews.com) – U.S. taxpayers are spending at least $18.6 million per day to house an estimated 300,000 to 450,000 illegal immigrants who are incarcerated and eligible for deportation from the United States, according to data from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ).

The cost per day for these prisoners is based on Justice Department incarceration cost estimates from 2001 and on the lower-end figure of 300,000 incarcerated deportable aliens, which means the actual expense today could be substantially higher than $18.6 million per day.

The prisons involved here are foreign national who have come into the United States, committed a crime, been captured, and imprisoned.

Half of the undocumented aliens who were removed from the United States in fiscal 2010 (which ended on Sept. 30) had been convicted of a crime in the United States.

On Wednesday, the office of the DHS Inspector General (IG) released its annual performance plan report for fiscal year 2011, which states that there are “approximately 300,000 to 450,000 criminal aliens incarcerated in federal, state, county, and local correctional facilities [who] are eligible for removal from the United States.”

In its March 2010 report, "Immigration Enforcement Actions: 2009," the DHS defines removal as "the compulsory and confirmed movement of an inadmissible or deportable alien out of the United States based on an order of removal. An alien who is removed has administrative or criminal consequences placed on subsequent reentry owing to the fact of the removal."

Kara McCarthy, a spokeswoman at the DOJ, told CNSNews.com that the latest data available show that “average annual operating costs per state inmate for Fiscal Year 2001 was $22,650; in the Federal Bureau of Prisons it was $22,632.”

These annual operation costs exclude “capital expenditures, juvenile corrections, probation, parole, and most central office functions of corrections spending,” McCarthy told CNSNews.com

The cost of $22,650 per year to house just one inmate at the state level equals about $62 a day ($22,650 divided by 365 days). In the Federal Bureau of Prisons, it also averages out to $62 per day ($22,632 divided by 365 days).

Given this daily average expense (based on fiscal year 2001 costs), it can be estimated that the cost of housing 300,000 incarcerated illegal aliens in U.S. prisons would equal $18.6 million per day; the cost for housing 450,000 incarcerated illegal aliens would equal $27.9 million per day. If inflation in prison costs since 2001 were factored in, the expense would be even greater.

When CNSNews.com asked why incarcerated aliens who are eligible for removal have not been deported, a DHS spokesperson said, “It is because they are still serving their criminal sentence. ICE does not receive criminal aliens from state criminal justice systems until after they have completed their sentences.” (ICE is the acronym for Immigration and Customs Enforcement.)

On the same day the IG’s office released its performance plan report, DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano and ICE Director John Morton announced that half of the undocumented aliens who were removed from the United States in fiscal year 2010, which ended on Sept. 30, were convicted criminals.

“In fiscal year 2010, ICE set a record for overall removals of illegal aliens, with more than 392,000 removals nationwide,” says an Oct. 6 press release from the DHS. “Half of those removed--more than 195,000--were convicted criminals.”

“The fiscal year 2010 statistics represent increases of more than 23,000 removals overall and 81,000 criminal removals compared to fiscal year 2008--a more than 70 percent increase in removal of criminal aliens from the previous administration,” added the release.

It is uncertain whether the IG office’s estimate of 300,000 to 450,000 incarcerated criminal aliens who are eligible for removal takes into account the 195,000 criminal aliens removed in fiscal 2010. The IG office did not respond to CNSNews.com for a clarification on this point before this story was posted.

Nevertheless, the DHS did not deport all of the criminal illegal aliens who are eligible for removal and are currently sitting in U.S. correctional facilities.

The DOJ spokeswoman told CNSNews.com that, according to its latest figures, “In 2008 there were 785,556 inmates in the nation's [local and county] jails and 1,518,559 inmates in state and federal prisons.” That equals 2,304,115 inmates in total in the United States.

Given those numbers, 300,000 incarcerated criminal aliens would equal 13 percent of the entire inmate population of the United States, while 450,000 incarcerated criminal aliens would equal 19.5 percent of the entire inmate population.

According to the IG report from DHS, “The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 requires ICE to initiate deportation proceedings for incarcerated criminal aliens as expeditiously as possible after the date of conviction. Criminal aliens who are eligible for deportation include illegal aliens in the United States who are convicted of any crime and lawful permanent residents who are convicted of a removable offense as defined in the Immigration and Nationality Act.”

Comment:

How much more do I need to say? If you add the above mentioned costs to the drain on our healthcare system, education system, and social programs, the costs become literally staggering!

These leaches are draining us dry. Enough is enough! The gravy train must end here and now!

And The Libertards Say Illegals Don't Cost That Much!

U.S. Spending At Least $18.6 Million Per Day to Incarcerate Illegal Aliens
More Than 195,000 Illegal Aliens Deported in Fiscal 2010 Had Committed Crimes Here

CNSNews.com) – U.S. taxpayers are spending at least $18.6 million per day to house an estimated 300,000 to 450,000 illegal immigrants who are incarcerated and eligible for deportation from the United States, according to data from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ).

The cost per day for these prisoners is based on Justice Department incarceration cost estimates from 2001 and on the lower-end figure of 300,000 incarcerated deportable aliens, which means the actual expense today could be substantially higher than $18.6 million per day.

The prisons involved here are foreign national who have come into the United States, committed a crime, been captured, and imprisoned.

Half of the undocumented aliens who were removed from the United States in fiscal 2010 (which ended on Sept. 30) had been convicted of a crime in the United States.

On Wednesday, the office of the DHS Inspector General (IG) released its annual performance plan report for fiscal year 2011, which states that there are “approximately 300,000 to 450,000 criminal aliens incarcerated in federal, state, county, and local correctional facilities [who] are eligible for removal from the United States.”

In its March 2010 report, "Immigration Enforcement Actions: 2009," the DHS defines removal as "the compulsory and confirmed movement of an inadmissible or deportable alien out of the United States based on an order of removal. An alien who is removed has administrative or criminal consequences placed on subsequent reentry owing to the fact of the removal."

Kara McCarthy, a spokeswoman at the DOJ, told CNSNews.com that the latest data available show that “average annual operating costs per state inmate for Fiscal Year 2001 was $22,650; in the Federal Bureau of Prisons it was $22,632.”

These annual operation costs exclude “capital expenditures, juvenile corrections, probation, parole, and most central office functions of corrections spending,” McCarthy told CNSNews.com

The cost of $22,650 per year to house just one inmate at the state level equals about $62 a day ($22,650 divided by 365 days). In the Federal Bureau of Prisons, it also averages out to $62 per day ($22,632 divided by 365 days).

Given this daily average expense (based on fiscal year 2001 costs), it can be estimated that the cost of housing 300,000 incarcerated illegal aliens in U.S. prisons would equal $18.6 million per day; the cost for housing 450,000 incarcerated illegal aliens would equal $27.9 million per day. If inflation in prison costs since 2001 were factored in, the expense would be even greater.

When CNSNews.com asked why incarcerated aliens who are eligible for removal have not been deported, a DHS spokesperson said, “It is because they are still serving their criminal sentence. ICE does not receive criminal aliens from state criminal justice systems until after they have completed their sentences.” (ICE is the acronym for Immigration and Customs Enforcement.)

On the same day the IG’s office released its performance plan report, DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano and ICE Director John Morton announced that half of the undocumented aliens who were removed from the United States in fiscal year 2010, which ended on Sept. 30, were convicted criminals.

“In fiscal year 2010, ICE set a record for overall removals of illegal aliens, with more than 392,000 removals nationwide,” says an Oct. 6 press release from the DHS. “Half of those removed--more than 195,000--were convicted criminals.”

“The fiscal year 2010 statistics represent increases of more than 23,000 removals overall and 81,000 criminal removals compared to fiscal year 2008--a more than 70 percent increase in removal of criminal aliens from the previous administration,” added the release.

It is uncertain whether the IG office’s estimate of 300,000 to 450,000 incarcerated criminal aliens who are eligible for removal takes into account the 195,000 criminal aliens removed in fiscal 2010. The IG office did not respond to CNSNews.com for a clarification on this point before this story was posted.

Nevertheless, the DHS did not deport all of the criminal illegal aliens who are eligible for removal and are currently sitting in U.S. correctional facilities.

The DOJ spokeswoman told CNSNews.com that, according to its latest figures, “In 2008 there were 785,556 inmates in the nation's [local and county] jails and 1,518,559 inmates in state and federal prisons.” That equals 2,304,115 inmates in total in the United States.

Given those numbers, 300,000 incarcerated criminal aliens would equal 13 percent of the entire inmate population of the United States, while 450,000 incarcerated criminal aliens would equal 19.5 percent of the entire inmate population.

According to the IG report from DHS, “The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 requires ICE to initiate deportation proceedings for incarcerated criminal aliens as expeditiously as possible after the date of conviction. Criminal aliens who are eligible for deportation include illegal aliens in the United States who are convicted of any crime and lawful permanent residents who are convicted of a removable offense as defined in the Immigration and Nationality Act.”

Comment:

How much more do I need to say? If you add the above mentioned costs to the drain on our healthcare system, education system, and social programs, the costs become literally staggering!

These leaches are draining us dry. Enough is enough! The gravy train must end here and now!

AZ boycott over immigration law sees mixed results

By BOB CHRISTIE, Associated Press Bob Christie, Associated Press – Thu Nov 18, 5:48 pm ET

PHOENIX – A boycott brought on by Arizona's controversial immigration crackdown raised the specter of vacant convention centers, desolate sports arenas and struggling businesses throughout the state.

Seven months later, the boycott's effects are coming into focus, showing it has been a disruptive force but nowhere near as crippling as originally feared.
Businesses have lost lucrative contracts and conventions have relocated, performers called off concerts, and cities and counties in about a dozen states passed resolutions to avoid doing business with Arizona. A report released Thursday says the boycott has cost the state $141 million in lost meeting and convention business since Republican Gov. Jan Brewer signed the law in April.

But the state's economy hasn't come to a screeching halt — as some who organized the boycott hoped. In fact, more people went to the Grand Canyon this summer than last year, and more stayed in Arizona's hotels and resorts, according to a review by The Associated Press.

"My occupancy has been pretty strong," said Flagstaff bed and breakfast owner Gordon Watkins. He got a few calls from confused international customers wondering if they would be asked for their papers, but no one canceled their reservations, he said, and business has been brisk.

Many conventions decided not to move, despite questions from their members. At the Phoenix Convention Center on Thursday, about 1,300 exhibitors, distributors and buyers were attending an annual show put on by the National School Supply & Equipment Association.

"We just kind of kept our eye on our members, and at least in our industry, they were coming whether that law was there or not," said Bill Duffy, the group's vice president of operations and meetings.

The most controversial parts of the law are on hold, including a section that would require police officers who are enforcing other laws to question the immigration status of those they suspect are in the country illegally. The federal government has won an injunction blocking the provisions and Arizona is awaiting a decision from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco on its appeal.
Civil rights groups organized the boycott to slow the state's economy in much the same way that a boycott punished Arizona 20 years ago over its refusal to honor the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. with a holiday. After voters approved that law, the NFL pulled the 1993 Super Bowl from Phoenix, and the NBA told the Phoenix Suns not to bother putting in a bid for the All-Star game. By the time voters finally passed a holiday bill two years later, estimates of lost convention business in the Phoenix area alone topped $190 million.

This time around, groups called on people not to fly Tempe-based US Airways or rent trucks from Phoenix-based U-Haul. There was talk of fighting Major League Baseball's plans for holding the All Star Game in Phoenix next year.

Most of those protests haven't come to fruition. The midsummer classic is still on, a spokeswoman for US Airways said the company saw no effect from the boycott call, and a U-Haul International executive said the same thing.

"In fact, year over year, we're up," said Jim Pena, the rental firm's president for Arizona.

Cities that called for boycotts, including Los Angeles and San Francisco, largely found themselves with few contracts to cancel and little Arizona travel to avoid.
"Ultimately only a few city employees' travel was changed and the few contracts we had with Arizona companies were allowed to go forward for economic reasons," said Tony Winnicker, a spokesman for San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom. A city of Los Angeles spokeswoman said only a few contracts were not continued, none large.
Still, some Arizona businesses have taken a big hit. In August, officials in Santa Monica, Calif., recommended that Phoenix-based Cavco Industries be awarded a $3 million contract to replace 20 aging mobile homes in a city-owned park. But the city council refused to give the contract to Cavco — the low bidder — because the company is Arizona-based, and Santa Monica had passed a resolution imposing sanctions.
"I don't think that what they did serves any real useful purpose," said company CEO Joe Stegmayer. The homes would have been built at a plant near Phoenix, he said, which would have led to more work for the primarily Hispanic work force there. "I don't think it really meets their objectives of trying to help people in the Hispanic community, for example, or the average working person."

The pain also has been felt by the convention industry. An estimated 15 million visitors come to Arizona each year for vacations, conventions and sporting events such as the Fiesta Bowl, pro golf tournaments and baseball spring training. The state tourism office estimates that conventions and other tourism-related activity brought in $16.6 billion in 2009 and that 157,200 people were employed in the industry.

An analysis commissioned by the Center for American Progress put hotel industry losses during the first four months after the signing of the law at about $45 million. Visitors would have spent an additional $96 million during their stays, said Angela Kelley, the group's vice president for immigration policy and advocacy.
"This is as much I think to serve as a warning to other states, particularly those who rely on tourism and conferences and conventions, that there is an economic impact to it," Kelley said. "We feel like this is a very modest slice, just a piece of what the economic impact is, and we don't think that we're overstating it or overselling it."

The study was paid for by the group, a liberal-leaning think tank, but conducted by the respected Scottsdale-based economic firm Elliott D. Pollack & Co. It also found that canceled meetings and conferences could cost the state nearly 2,800 jobs, $87 million in lost wages and more than $250 million in lost economic output over the next two to three years.

The jump in hotel occupancy cheers tourism officials. Visitation at the Grand Canyon went up by nearly 3 percent in June, July and August, compared with the same period in 2009. Arizona hotel occupancy rose by 8.3 percent in June, 2.6 percent in July and 3.4 percent in August, according to Smith Travel Research.

But conventions and the business they spark bring in much more revenue than the leisure market, said Debbie Johnson, president and CEO of the Arizona Hotel & Lodging Association, and the increase in visitation is compared with dismal 2009 occupancy levels that were below national rates.

Comment:

This is really good news. It seems the boycott is basically a fizzle. STAND TOUGH ARIZONA! YOU ARE LEADING THE WAY!

Also it is ironic that what little effect the boycotts are having hurts the Latino community worst of all, as the lost jobs were held primarily by them. It makes one wonder if these other cities are standing up for Latinos in general, or specifically illegals and to hell with the legal Latino immigrants.

The libertards will have to accept that the American people, many of whom are Latino themselves, have had enough of illegal immigration.

Also, it is the libertards who are making this a racial issue. Illegal immigration is just that - ILLEGAL. Race or skin colour has nothing to do with it. White, Black, Brown, Yellow, Purple with Pink Polkadots - it doesn't matter. The United States has immigration laws, and these Mestizos are the ones flaunting them. This is a legal issue, not racial.

AZ boycott over immigration law sees mixed results

By BOB CHRISTIE, Associated Press Bob Christie, Associated Press – Thu Nov 18, 5:48 pm ET

PHOENIX – A boycott brought on by Arizona's controversial immigration crackdown raised the specter of vacant convention centers, desolate sports arenas and struggling businesses throughout the state.

Seven months later, the boycott's effects are coming into focus, showing it has been a disruptive force but nowhere near as crippling as originally feared.
Businesses have lost lucrative contracts and conventions have relocated, performers called off concerts, and cities and counties in about a dozen states passed resolutions to avoid doing business with Arizona. A report released Thursday says the boycott has cost the state $141 million in lost meeting and convention business since Republican Gov. Jan Brewer signed the law in April.

But the state's economy hasn't come to a screeching halt — as some who organized the boycott hoped. In fact, more people went to the Grand Canyon this summer than last year, and more stayed in Arizona's hotels and resorts, according to a review by The Associated Press.

"My occupancy has been pretty strong," said Flagstaff bed and breakfast owner Gordon Watkins. He got a few calls from confused international customers wondering if they would be asked for their papers, but no one canceled their reservations, he said, and business has been brisk.

Many conventions decided not to move, despite questions from their members. At the Phoenix Convention Center on Thursday, about 1,300 exhibitors, distributors and buyers were attending an annual show put on by the National School Supply & Equipment Association.

"We just kind of kept our eye on our members, and at least in our industry, they were coming whether that law was there or not," said Bill Duffy, the group's vice president of operations and meetings.

The most controversial parts of the law are on hold, including a section that would require police officers who are enforcing other laws to question the immigration status of those they suspect are in the country illegally. The federal government has won an injunction blocking the provisions and Arizona is awaiting a decision from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco on its appeal.
Civil rights groups organized the boycott to slow the state's economy in much the same way that a boycott punished Arizona 20 years ago over its refusal to honor the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. with a holiday. After voters approved that law, the NFL pulled the 1993 Super Bowl from Phoenix, and the NBA told the Phoenix Suns not to bother putting in a bid for the All-Star game. By the time voters finally passed a holiday bill two years later, estimates of lost convention business in the Phoenix area alone topped $190 million.

This time around, groups called on people not to fly Tempe-based US Airways or rent trucks from Phoenix-based U-Haul. There was talk of fighting Major League Baseball's plans for holding the All Star Game in Phoenix next year.

Most of those protests haven't come to fruition. The midsummer classic is still on, a spokeswoman for US Airways said the company saw no effect from the boycott call, and a U-Haul International executive said the same thing.

"In fact, year over year, we're up," said Jim Pena, the rental firm's president for Arizona.

Cities that called for boycotts, including Los Angeles and San Francisco, largely found themselves with few contracts to cancel and little Arizona travel to avoid.
"Ultimately only a few city employees' travel was changed and the few contracts we had with Arizona companies were allowed to go forward for economic reasons," said Tony Winnicker, a spokesman for San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom. A city of Los Angeles spokeswoman said only a few contracts were not continued, none large.
Still, some Arizona businesses have taken a big hit. In August, officials in Santa Monica, Calif., recommended that Phoenix-based Cavco Industries be awarded a $3 million contract to replace 20 aging mobile homes in a city-owned park. But the city council refused to give the contract to Cavco — the low bidder — because the company is Arizona-based, and Santa Monica had passed a resolution imposing sanctions.
"I don't think that what they did serves any real useful purpose," said company CEO Joe Stegmayer. The homes would have been built at a plant near Phoenix, he said, which would have led to more work for the primarily Hispanic work force there. "I don't think it really meets their objectives of trying to help people in the Hispanic community, for example, or the average working person."

The pain also has been felt by the convention industry. An estimated 15 million visitors come to Arizona each year for vacations, conventions and sporting events such as the Fiesta Bowl, pro golf tournaments and baseball spring training. The state tourism office estimates that conventions and other tourism-related activity brought in $16.6 billion in 2009 and that 157,200 people were employed in the industry.

An analysis commissioned by the Center for American Progress put hotel industry losses during the first four months after the signing of the law at about $45 million. Visitors would have spent an additional $96 million during their stays, said Angela Kelley, the group's vice president for immigration policy and advocacy.
"This is as much I think to serve as a warning to other states, particularly those who rely on tourism and conferences and conventions, that there is an economic impact to it," Kelley said. "We feel like this is a very modest slice, just a piece of what the economic impact is, and we don't think that we're overstating it or overselling it."

The study was paid for by the group, a liberal-leaning think tank, but conducted by the respected Scottsdale-based economic firm Elliott D. Pollack & Co. It also found that canceled meetings and conferences could cost the state nearly 2,800 jobs, $87 million in lost wages and more than $250 million in lost economic output over the next two to three years.

The jump in hotel occupancy cheers tourism officials. Visitation at the Grand Canyon went up by nearly 3 percent in June, July and August, compared with the same period in 2009. Arizona hotel occupancy rose by 8.3 percent in June, 2.6 percent in July and 3.4 percent in August, according to Smith Travel Research.

But conventions and the business they spark bring in much more revenue than the leisure market, said Debbie Johnson, president and CEO of the Arizona Hotel & Lodging Association, and the increase in visitation is compared with dismal 2009 occupancy levels that were below national rates.

Comment:

This is really good news. It seems the boycott is basically a fizzle. STAND TOUGH ARIZONA! YOU ARE LEADING THE WAY!

Also it is ironic that what little effect the boycotts are having hurts the Latino community worst of all, as the lost jobs were held primarily by them. It makes one wonder if these other cities are standing up for Latinos in general, or specifically illegals and to hell with the legal Latino immigrants.

The libertards will have to accept that the American people, many of whom are Latino themselves, have had enough of illegal immigration.

Also, it is the libertards who are making this a racial issue. Illegal immigration is just that - ILLEGAL. Race or skin colour has nothing to do with it. White, Black, Brown, Yellow, Purple with Pink Polkadots - it doesn't matter. The United States has immigration laws, and these Mestizos are the ones flaunting them. This is a legal issue, not racial.